thanks for star RB :p
13:49 P A N: hi xinely :3
13:49 P A N: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2600027
13:50 Xinely: aa thanks ><
13:52 P A N: D:
13:52 Xinely: pan
13:52 Xinely: let's irc
13:52 P A N: hi :3
13:52 P A N: ok
13:53 Xinely: 00:06:049 - well try to map this until 00:06:553 - ? well prefer follow vocal too haha
13:54 P A N: lol noo XD
13:54 Xinely: DX
13:55 Xinely: 00:08:066 (6) - try use spacing 0,3x too for consistency with 00:07:688 - ?
13:55 P A N: ><
13:56 Xinely: =w=
13:57 P A N: ok
13:57 P A N: fix a bit different
13:57 Xinely: 00:13:865 (5,6,7,8,9) - just see flow here, try to make similar like http://puu.sh/4DUZV.jpg?
14:00 Xinely: 00:14:873 (1) - i can't tell why but imo this slider head need finish as in 00:06:806 -
14:01 P A N: ok
14:02 Xinely: 00:36:049 - add note? vocal here
14:04 P A N: hmm I think the vocal is on blue tick
14:04 Xinely: blue and white
14:04 Xinely: 00:39:075 (5) - place in 132,124 for better flow?
14:05 P A N: I want to make it blanket with (1) again ><
14:05 Xinely: omg q
14:05 Xinely: *k
14:06 Xinely: 00:50:928 (2) - even this is insane, i feel weird if (2) stacked while (3) is not stacked
14:06 Xinely: consider to make stacked them or not
14:06 P A N: ok
14:06 P A N: make 2 stack with 3
14:07 Xinely: 00:51:397 - aaa, add note since have drum here?
14:08 P A N: hmm I think its volume are low so i want to break there
14:09 Xinely: eh, as i heard 00:51:866 - this drum lower than 00:51:397 -
14:11 Xinely: 01:19:639 (6) - nazi, flow better if you put this slider more down
14:11 P A N: yeah but I think add on 00:51:397 - it will be stream 6 and yes, I hate it DX
14:12 Xinely: lol
14:12 Xinely: 01:28:721 - make volume lower, maybe 60-70% , almost can't heard vocal
14:13 Xinely: oh not kiai time, so make that time 60% and 01:43:721 - volume 70%
14:13 P A N: ok
14:14 P A N: ok
14:14 Xinely: asdf one <3
14:14 P A N: eh and what is asdf? XD
14:15 Xinely: hmm asdf <3
14:15 Xinely: 02:18:662 (7) - make sure NC are consistency here, from here, i always see NC'ed every 2 stanza but the previous is every one stanza
14:16 Xinely: because NC must consistency, it's mean 02:26:163 (8) - must NC , 02:27:526 (1) - no need NC here
14:17 P A N: k k
14:17 Xinely: 02:34:116 - so sad here, actually you can make stream
14:18 P A N: well I like this more XD
14:18 Xinely: 02:51:399 (1) - so nazi, maybe you can make better blanket here, well try 292|216?
14:19 Xinely: 02:58:237 - volume 25-30%
14:19 Xinely: well i surprised that drum after this volume asdf ><
14:20 Xinely: 03:04:855 (1) - no need NC
14:20 Xinely: i believe ;---;
14:20 Xinely: asdf
14:21 P A N: kk
14:22 Xinely: 03:16:202 (2,3,4,5,6) - flow is bad here imo, try make similar like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1010557 ?
14:23 P A N: kk
14:24 Xinely: 03:40:498 (1,2,3) - actually can make stream again lol
14:24 Xinely: KOTOKO <3
14:24 Xinely: 03:53:702 (2) - 356,164, flow better imo
14:25 P A N: O:
14:25 P A N: ok
14:25 Xinely: 04:14:089 (2) - idk why, i prefer ctrl+G here lol
14:26 P A N: lol you are sadist XDD
14:28 Xinely: 04:41:934 (1,2,3,4,5) - nice pattern here but try this pattern to have jumps for better flow
14:28 Xinely: http://puu.sh/4DVHw.jpg
14:29 Xinely: btw nice editing mp3 ><
14:29 P A N: my friend XD
14:30 Xinely: yap nice due nonstop mp3 ><
14:30 Xinely: 05:02:982 - add note here, place in 348,312. believe me it's nice lol
14:31 Xinely: flow better imo if u ctrl+G 05:08:696 (2) -
14:31 Xinely: 05:11:017 (1,2) - aaa anti jump, try swap NC than
14:32 Xinely: 05:22:803 (3) - anti jump =w=. stacked in (2)'s tail if you not want to NC this
14:32 Xinely: 05:27:446 (1,2) - same as i mean in 05_08_696
14:33 Xinely: 05:08:696 D:
14:33 P A N: .- -.
14:33 Xinely: 05:30:124 (6,1) - should be swap NC here due change pattern
14:34 Xinely: 05:52:486 (8) - 104, 340
14:34 P A N: kk
14:35 Xinely: 06:25:907 (4) - i'm cruel so i prefer ctrl+G here lol
14:37 P A N: lol if ctrl+g that
14:37 P A N: i will do on 5,6 too
14:37 P A N: its nice XDD
14:37 Xinely: xD
14:38 Xinely: 07:18:532 (1) - finish in head?
14:38 Xinely: 07:28:210 (1) - how nazi, no need NC
14:39 P A N: i think thats smart end lol
14:39 P A N: single NC on the end
14:40 Xinely: 08:03:309 (5,7) - Need NC for readable
14:40 P A N: kk :3
14:40 Xinely: okay that all
thanks so much GG :3 updated!Gloria Guard wrote:
Hi.[General]all fixed
This is map different part offset a little slow or fast, You check this map all part offset.
You change source Shakugan_No_Shana -> Shakugan No Shana (remove _ <-)
This is map offset issue, You'll change this part offset.Offset change list00:06:806 change -> 6780 or 6790
01:28:721 change -> 88750
02:06:162 change -> 126150 and I'm sure 02:13:434 this point is different bpm offset here.
02:42:355 change -> 162370 or 162380
03:12:189 change -> 192200
04:24:705 change -> 264710
06:35:740 change -> 395710
07:03:049 change -> 423060 or 423070
07:33:720 change -> 453720[Shana]
01:42:080 (2) This is slider direction a little up is better flow imo. hmm, i think its ok
04:11:107 (6) Umm, This is note stack by (4) note?, I think more clean pattern imo. like this is better flow imo.
04:57:982 (7) Why this note spacing is small?, it's a little confuse, well I suggestion different pattern ok
06:54:653 (3) I'm understand this pattern intended but i don't like this pattern flow If you change Ctrl+G is better flowok
07:13:855 Why you don't add this point, You know this point hear drum sound also you don't add this point I think players really confuse.ok
07:15:145 (5,7) This is (5) slider end add clap and (7) slider add clap is good sound here. ok
07:21:113 (3,4,5,6) I don't understand this rhythm, because a little awkward, I suggestion you put the lyrcis rhythm is better rhythm. I think the current one is more fit.
07:27:210 (6) Here, there is no reason to put New combo. Remove NC ok
oh yes, you're right.GitahMuttan wrote:
I think it should be "Various Artists" on the title, right?
Anyway, epic map.
Offset: 6,784ms BPM: 119.00
Offset: 46,823ms BPM: 128.00
Offset: 88,746ms BPM: 128.00
Offset: 126,148ms BPM: 132.00
Offset: 162,380ms BPM: 136.00
Offset: 192,196ms BPM: 142.00
Offset: 227,681ms BPM: 142.00
Offset: 264,710ms BPM: 148.00
Offset: 296,730ms BPM: 168.00
Offset: 336,693ms BPM: 169.00
Offset: 367,584ms BPM: 180.00
Offset: 395,716ms BPM: 184.00
Offset: 423,082ms BPM: 186.00
Offset: 453,716ms BPM: 212.00
captin1 wrote:
owo
[Timing]
Checkin all timings, cause that's what I do :3SPOILEROffset: 6,784ms BPM: 119.00
Offset: 46,823ms BPM: 128.00
Offset: 88,746ms BPM: 128.00
Offset: 126,148ms BPM: 132.00
Offset: 162,380ms BPM: 136.00
Offset: 192,196ms BPM: 142.00
Offset: 227,681ms BPM: 142.00
Offset: 264,710ms BPM: 148.00
Offset: 296,730ms BPM: 168.00
Offset: 336,693ms BPM: 169.00
Offset: 367,584ms BPM: 180.00
Offset: 395,716ms BPM: 184.00
Offset: 423,082ms BPM: 186.00
Offset: 453,716ms BPM: 212.00
^ all fixed
[Shana]
you saw me play it heh, it's quite nice, just gonna be picky with flow/rhythm
00:11:075 (2) - I think this feels better raised up above (1), instead of below it, since this feels more natural into the next notes ok
01:32:031 (5,6,7,8) - I think you should unstack these just a bit and have them lead to the next part, so the player can keep at least a little motion going through these doubles, like as if they were a 1/4 slider ok
01:50:429 (4,5) - I think these two are a bit too close together, since the player will move a bit quicker coming off of this slider. I would suggest moving 4 to the right and up some, so the distance between it and 3 is about the same but between 4 and 5 is larger I think the current one is fine
01:52:421 (5,6) - this seems a bit odd, since the vocal is 1/2 before the circle here, I would remove this repeat and have at least some sort of click on this vocal note 01:52:890 - here ok
01:56:171 (4) - along the same lines as ^, would change this to two circles so there are clicks on the strong notes nah, not for this. I think the current one is more flow.
03:04:438 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - move this stream to the right a bit? more slider leniency/moving faster off of it yada yada stuff, it just feels better :3 ok
03:14:523 (2,3,4) - I think making this triple unstacked, but in a line with the slider would be cool, and a bit smoother ok
03:20:016 (2,3,4) - ^ ok
04:08:807 (3) - I think this should have a ctrl+ g on it, for nicer flow (moving the notes right after, of course :3). The triple 04:09:441 (6,7,1) - here may become an issue because of this, so unstacking it I think would help with that yes you're right but I still don't have other idea (flow note) for this now so i will keep it in mind.
04:36:264 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - For these, I think you should reverse 2 and 3, so the triangle goes counter clockwise instead of clockwise. Reason for this is how it moves into the next part, it feels odd going into 04:37:480 (4,5,1) - after as it is. Having the 3 far to the right sets up this stream much more easily the 3 (second triangle)'s distance will far form 1 too much imo so don't change.
05:13:517 (6) - (nazi) This slider would look better a bit higher up, so it keeps with the visual flow of the sliders around it owo ok
06:55:764 (3,4) - ctrl + g on these perhaps? the square jump pattern would feel cool here ok
07:07:263 (7) - this note feels a bit too out of place among all the cool flow things you do, maybe you can grab both 07:07:263 (7,8) - and move them towards the top left corner? change a bit different.
07:45:889 (3,4) - this is similar to ^, but perhaps to a lesser degree, due to the difference in bpm it feels a bit better, but feel free to change in a similar way if you agreed with the one before no for this
officially a big fan of your style, it looks quite nice and plays great, so props to you (which comes in the form of stars ) thanks so much captin ><
P A N next elite mapper :3
good luck!
thanks :3 some fixed and most of all will considerUnsfamiliar wrote:
Hii Pan :3
m4m (If you think this is ok)
Starto~
Shana
- 00:31:742 (4) - Try new combo. I wouldn't say it was hard to read before, but with new combo it is easier to read the double 00:31:742 (4,5) because of the overlap.
- 00:37:288 (2) - Move this to x:152 y:244. The angle created with 00:37:540 (3) previously felt strange for me. I think you should either move (2) like I said or rotate (3) a bit to create more circular flow.
- 01:07:682 (9) - New combo to break out of the previous pattern; easier to read and looks neater.
- 01:32:144 (6,7) - I think it works better if you add a slider from 01:32:144 to 01:32:378 instead of the two doubles. A slider is justified by the lyric and is more comfortable to play.
- 02:19:670 (4,5) - ^ Actually you could do the same as above. It maintains the same rhythm you have but also makes use of the lyric
- 02:58:482 (1,2,3,4) - This part seems a bit strange to me. I think you should match the lyrics better by trying something like:
- 05:30:569 (4) - I think this 1/8 slider should actually start at 05:30:480. You can then extend it to 05:30:658. This matches the song and is also easier to hit since it is not on the blue tick.
- 06:35:716 - Seems like the volume got really loud form here. Or is it just me?
- 07:03:082 - Ok, this song is definitely louder. Is this intentional?
- 08:14:329 - Not sure if this is how the song actually ends, but I'm not a fan of the sudden cut off. It feels kind of anticlimactic in my opinion
Ok sorry for poor mod, this map is too good! Love the hit sounds; thanks for sharing some Shana with us
Star and good luck!
<3Giralda wrote:
omg Shana <3333