Let's try that again.
Vote: Haneii
Hopefully it takes this time.
Vote: Haneii
Hopefully it takes this time.
Do you really think Mafia would just go over Rantai if they knew I'm currently watching him? That'd be a direct expose of scum, you know. If they know I'm going to Watch Rantai they will probably just change the target to avoid getting caught (unless I'm missing something?). If this is done then me or pieguy would most likely be nightkilled as we are the remaining PRs without any protection.CalignoBot wrote:
fartownik watches one confirmed town (mason), while pieguy1372 jails the vigilante. Most likely, the watched target is going to die.
Well, it'd be nice if you elaborated on this. Why would scum risk getting caught (or more like, conciously going into a trap) by killing a target aimed by Watcher?CalignoBot wrote:
I might not have explained well enough why that is the most likely result. I think I explained my whole thought process behind that, albeit in a somewhat messy way, but I can explain that part of it in another post if it's still confusing.
fartownik wrote:
Well, it'd be nice if you elaborated on this. Why would scum risk getting caught (or more like, conciously going into a trap) by killing a target aimed by Watcher?CalignoBot wrote:
I might not have explained well enough why that is the most likely result. I think I explained my whole thought process behind that, albeit in a somewhat messy way, but I can explain that part of it in another post if it's still confusing.
I assume it's because if they shoot you or pieguy (or a VT if they're retarded) instead, then we'll still have 2 alive confirmed-towns which significantly pushes the odds into our favour.Rantai wrote:
The scum will almost definitely hit RB or I because we're confirmed. If they don't then they're shooting themselves in the foot (which is fine by me).
Where exactly? At the very least I don't remember using that as an argument for or against.CalignoBot wrote:
Okay, from what I can tell, DakeDekaane is getting fire on page 20 for saying that BRBP shouldn't claim his role.
Why?CalignoBot wrote:
Jinxy is starting to ping to me as well.
Until when? Might work if he was still hidden, but mafia will prob just kill him when we need to use him (Mafia's shots occur first, right?).CalignoBot wrote:
I fully recommend we keep the vigilante alive as long as possible instead of the mason.
You guys asked to elaborate so I did. My main suspects atm are Haneii and Jinxy.fartownik wrote:
@Dake: concentrate more on the potential targets for the lynch today instead of writing up the possible scenarios of tommorrow. We must focus on minimalizing the possibility of lynching scum today and what you're doing is not helpful at the moment. What are your main scumspects? Also, what do you think about Irre and JInxy?
What if scum recruited the traitor? The two remaining would be like: "Hey, I'm going to be jailed" "Ok, I'll make the kill". It's not a nice course of action.Haneii wrote:
[In preparation for if we hit sucm today] We should probably decide on who we all think is the next most suspicious (right after the person we lynch today) and that person should be targeted by Jailkeeper.
DakeDekaane wrote:
What if scum recruited the traitor?
What if they didn't?DakeDekaane wrote:
And why did you say things get better by accidentally lynching town?
But there's only one mafia to do the kill.CalignoBot wrote:
Telling the Jailkeeper who to target offensively is not a good idea either; all scum has to do is select someone else to make the kill. If we're doing it at all, the jailing will be secret.
Oh, and right there when I said scum I was referring to Mafia. Won't work if we lynch traitor today.Haneii wrote:
[In preparation for if we hit sucm today] We should probably decide on who we all think is the next most suspicious (right after the person we lynch today) and that person should be targeted by Jailkeeper.
Just give me your thoughts from the top of your head. My behaviour and actions were "meh" to you. What did you get from Jinxy?CalignoBot wrote:
I'll explain Jinxy scumread when I skim through a second time.
Wait, which parts are? The things I can remember agreeing with are the massclaim and the reads on Dake.Rantai wrote:
His ISO is rife with parroting and/or jumping in behind another accusation. As much as I don't like DD's play so far, Jinxy is even more uncomfortable. That and he was still one of the non voters and first for the plan so I'm more or less satisfied with that for now (explanation can merely be a cover, considering the insight provided).
What if they didn't?/quote]Haneii wrote:
DakeDekaane wrote:
What if scum recruited the traitor?
Why do we have to keep it in account? At the very least it'll help us confirm that the traitor was recruited (In that case I'm going to guess their other power is Day chat, so we won't have to worry about a ninja anymore).CalignoBot wrote:
We can't assume that the traitor wasn't recruited for planning night actions, though. We have no knowledge of that, so it always has to be taken into account.
Jinxy wrote:
This is a negative proof fallacy, if mafia did recruit the traitor, then your plan falls completely flat and we've wasted the JK for the night. We have no way of telling right now so this sounds like an attempt to waste the JK.
And how is it a waste? What is the JK going to be doing tonight?Haneii wrote:
At the very least it'll help us confirm that the traitor was recruited
Day 2 ends in little over a day. I work all day and only have the evenings to posts...so yeah. Why I waited to vote? I wanted to hear more for others (including you) before making my vote.Jinxy wrote:
The fact that Haneii also voted on me right after Rantai while claiming the reason was in her previous post, is really raising my suspicions because she could have voted any time instead of waiting for another person.
Free kill? How do you know who to protect?Jinxy wrote:
To add on: If you're wrong and the traitor was recruited, you also just gave him a free kill for the conf town since checking/protecting them needs both JK and Watcher
Why and then what?DakeDekaane wrote:
I'd make the JK protect somebody with no telling who
If they didn't recruit the traitor there won't be a kill and we have an opportunity to catch our first mafia...DakeDekaane wrote:
Even if they didn't recruit Traitor, they could mislead us to lynch a townie in case we jail the wrong person.
Sorry, I don't agree that not killing a confirmed town pushes the odds in town favour that much in this point of time - they can just kill of the least suspicious after conf. town. They can afford to kill someone else tonight and we'd still be in as much as in dark as we are now.Jinxy wrote:
The confirmed town, Rantai and RB, in Caligno's post. The plan was to force scum to either sacrifice 1 guy to kill a conf, or don't kill a conf and push the odds into town favour.
Haneii wrote:
If they didn't recruit the traitor therewon'tmight not be a kill and we have an opportunity to catch our first mafia...
CalignoBot wrote:
Here's the thing; we have to have the watcher secretly choose between the two confirmed town and the jailkeeper. The glaring issue with this is that there is a case where we have literally no information -> if the watch and jail both miss (which is a pretty decent probability, actually; 49.5% by my calculations), then we gain nothing. We don't know anything about what the scum have chosen, nothing. That's a really hefty percentage to base this on.
Naturally, killing the Watcher is very suboptimal. All that really achieves is confirming the jailkeeper as town.
Because obviously they'll be compelled to target either RB or Rantai, especially after CalignoBot repeatedly said they would? Hey, I guess it could happen.Tanzklaue wrote:
RB should be jailkept, Rantai should be watched. as long as fartownik isn't scum, the things that happen from that can't be too bad I think.
Because obviously watchers and jailkeepers only target people they already know are 100% scum? Of course there's a chance they could miss >.> There's also a chance that mafia won't go after any of the PR or conf. town. Chances chances chance~CalignoBot wrote:
we have to have the watcher secretly choose between the two confirmed town and the jailkeeper. The glaring issue with this is that there is a case where we have literally no information -> if the watch and jail both miss (which is a pretty decent probability, actually; 49.5% by my calculations), then we gain nothing.
Plan 2 if we lynch mafia.pieguy1372 wrote:
so we've got two options:thoughts?
- 1. Keep Rantai alive to give us a better chance on D3
If we assume both me and fartownik are confirmed, option 1 gives us a 3/5 chance of hitting mafia D3 (Rantai + one confirmed alive D3).- 2. JK and watch two people and hope we find out something or prevent a NK
This gives a bit more room to cover all possibilities (e.g. fartownik watches one of RB, Rantai, or me, and I JK one out of the remaining 4). There's also the chance I roleblock a mafia and stop the NK from happening. Mafia can't WIFOM us because either way they decide, there's a chance they fail. Hell, I could even JK fartownik with a low probability in order to ensure they don't just kill fartownik.
Swap me for RB and I'm fine with either or just because I have no utility at all while RB can save us as a last ditch chance.pieguy1372 wrote:
what is this I don't even
Trying to predict scum's target is just a bunch of WIFOM. IMO we should play the safest possible path and avoid taking any unnecessary risks. there's no need to keep RB alive "just cause he's the vigilante" because I'm pretty sure at this point it's most advantageous for him not to shoot anyone else anyway.
Rantai is confirmed town, so we've got two options:thoughts?
- 1. Keep Rantai alive to give us a better chance on D3
If we assume both me and fartownik are confirmed, option 1 gives us a 3/5 chance of hitting mafia D3 (Rantai + one confirmed alive D3).- 2. JK and watch two people and hope we find out something or prevent a NK
This gives a bit more room to cover all possibilities (e.g. fartownik watches one of RB, Rantai, or me, and I JK one out of the remaining 4). There's also the chance I roleblock a mafia and stop the NK from happening. Mafia can't WIFOM us because either way they decide, there's a chance they fail. Hell, I could even JK fartownik with a low probability in order to ensure they don't just kill fartownik.
NoHitter and Jinxy were the ones doing that; the post itself that said this wasn't on page 20, the ones making this point were. The post I was referring to was this on page 19:Rantai wrote:
Where exactly? At the very least I don't remember using that as an argument for or against.CalignoBot wrote:
Okay, from what I can tell, DakeDekaane is getting fire on page 20 for saying that BRBP shouldn't claim his role.
Note that the first two paragraphs of this post were removed for having no relevance to this point.DakeDekaane wrote:
Guessing BRBP's role won't lead to anything good for town, he should stay as that, when he gets/does something important, then he just have to spit it out. Also I'm curious how you read NH as his plan is clearly anti-town, not saying scum as there's nothing confirmed, in exchange of getting confirmed towns and possible scum, we served some tasty PRs for them in a silver plate.
Raging Bull wrote:
Haneii...Somehow just gut feeling. sorry pieguy.
saying that you flipped a coin and acted on that is finePretty much this. I didn't want to bother with all the WIFOM, so I tried this instead and it ended up being Rantai. I'm quite sure it won't have much of an effect on anything since it's LyLo anyway, but oh well.
I did ask for examples, but regardless, any form of "parroting" you say I did is because I agree the plan would work/the accusation is valid. For NH's plan, the insight provided when I ran the numbers was that town stood to gain more when all the information added up, even if the only thing maf gained could be considered to have a bit more weightage.Rantai wrote:
His ISO is rife with parroting and/or jumping in behind another accusation. As much as I don't like DD's play so far, Jinxy is even more uncomfortable. That and he was still one of the non voters and first for the plan so I'm more or less satisfied with that for now (explanation can merely be a cover, considering the insight provided).
I don't know how you came to the wagoning conclusion, considering I voted eons after Irre/Caligno. Ironically enough, the reason I voted Haneii was precisely because she was wagoning on me right after Rantai.pieguy1372 wrote:
I bet it's probably DakeDekaane still, but now I'm even more suspicious of JInxy, cause he bandwagoned on Haneii, plus IIRC he didn't contribute anything new really on D2. Also, he hasn't posted much which is the same as I remember him always doing as scum.
Erm, because I thought he's going to get lynched?DakeDekaane wrote:
fart, why you watched Rantai?
CalignoBot wrote:
Rantai, are you absolutely sure about this? I'm getting a very bad feeling about this wagon with the DakeDekaane vote.
For the first one, I didn't think NH answered that question at all so I added in.Rantai wrote:
@Jinxy - p/2387466/ - pointless reiteration, the point was made
p/2396642/ - jumping onto NH's pressure
For the second one, I was replying to Dake's post above and pointing out where exactly the flip-flop was for other people.NoHitter wrote:
That's why we only lynch suspicious PRs. After we lynch them, we lynch the non-PRs based on how scummy they are.Haneii wrote:
That isn't the only lie [scum] can make. They can say they don't have a power role when they do.
How so? Distance voting is always popular.DakeDekaane wrote:
And it'd be pretty stupid for scum voting each other in LyLo.
This situation is a lot different than Day 2. There's an inherent risk of scum piling on in a lynch for an instant win, so I want to make sure that we come to a clear consensus before making any possibly game-ending decisions.pieguy1372 wrote:
now I wonder about Caligno. someone made a point D1 of how Irre was acting even more ridiculous than in previous games, and currently it seems to me like Caligno is hesitating way too much. and it seems he's kind of misleading a bit, not only with Haneii, but I got confused just reading some of his huge posts.
I was asleep, sorry.Rantai wrote:
Also considering that everyone except Tanz has posted and no ninja hammer has occurred I'm going to say it's a fairly safe bet (I am going to say Tanz stands more town than scum, but that isn't much to go by unfortunately).