Oh wow, so many new posts while i was typing my last one, imma read them ASAP.
For now all that I'm doing, I'm doing to get more information about players. Nothing more.Sakura wrote:
@tiper: Why did you jump on my b/w when Irreversible's vote was obviously an OMGUS vote?
Because ofLincolm wrote:
Why you think she is on the town side?
Just dont edit your post, put that in your next post...Irreversible wrote:
I'm sorry for my weird argumentations so far, i thought there are 3 teams, omg XD
i'm going to read the other posts soon, and ask some more questions.
so far: unvote: sakura because i messed the things up
EBWOP: I have to make Unvote: Sakura bold
If you keep count farto voted him first, he provided his reason and I provided mine.Irreversible wrote:
Why is everybody behind konei now? o.o'' don't really get that, only because sakura voted him first ? (as far as i remember)
If he doesn't cancel his vote at the end of the day and Konei turns scum then he's probably town.Sakura wrote:
@farto: thoughts on tiper's vote for Konei? do you think he's busing? do you think he's town?
...I thought I did?fartownik wrote:
I voted Konei first. Just read through our previous posts, the explanations are there.
Maybe cuz Sakura caught the guy "Oh, I don't know if it's you, but I'll leave my vote on you for now so if you get lynched it will be like an innocent kill" with p/2305512Irreversible wrote:
Why is everybody behind konei now?
Oh, you're right. That no votecount.Nyquill wrote:
...I thought I did?fartownik wrote:
I voted Konei first. Just read through our previous posts, the explanations are there.
You can always no-lynch if you're not sure, analyze the ISOs to get more information, random vote or just sheep to someone.Irreversible wrote:
@fartownik: Dunno what I should think about, maybe they want to get sure that they are a townie, who knows.
This is pretty messed up right now, dunno who deserved my vote right now
I don't think Hika and those are scum together, but there's a posibility of that being true, maybe it was a true misunderstanding from my part, dunno. But I'm a bit curious how you say Hika is most probably town, what made you think that? I can remember Hika said he(she) wanted to make D1 a little more interesting, why?Lincolm wrote:
Okay, why you keep think Hika and Those are scum together? What do you think about Me and BRBP's interaction? And Irreversible and Sakura's interaction?DakeDekaane wrote:
Yeah, that made me retract of Hika being with those almost at all, I think we can't get any solid base before the day ends.
To help you a bit in this thread you can find the ISO archives where you can look at everyone's posts on an specific game on ISO (Isolation)Irreversible wrote:
lol.. that's more than enough :c
Dake: Null atm, don't see much from him in the terms of scumhunting tho I do see him at least reading the thread, Tho after reading his ISO i got another question for him.Irreversible wrote:
@Sakura: What do you think about Dake and Konei right now? Because it seems like you're not trusting them.
It is quite possible that the only reason that some people voted those in general could be because he was clearly scum in Mafia Restoration Project, but others need to realize that even if it's possible to be scum once again, it's possibly unlikely but we will see how the game progresses. I think if we accelerate day by hammering in, it'll get better than this but you all have managed to make this game interesting with the analyzation of misunderstandings, as I've seen after reading the last few pages.DakeDekaane wrote:
Was Tsukasa trying to lead the wagon on those? Why.
NEVER!Sakura wrote:
@Mr Color & Raging Bull: Are you guys ever gonna post some content?
RVSIrreversible wrote:
@Raging Bull: Is there a reason why you voted for Tsukasa? Did you vote for him because he voted those? Tell us *O*
Because you can act pro-town as scum so people won't suspect you.Irreversible wrote:
@Mr Color: I hope you don't do this, only to avoid some discussions and stuff, otherwise this would be very predictable now.
Another question to Sakura: Why do you try to be that agressive? I mean yeah, you want to get away the scum.. but this is so confusing to me, I'm still behind my theorie that you want to camouflage that you're scum yourself. @~@ My FoS is still on you. And no, this is not only because you voted me once.
Also I found it funny how you just vote for Konei after farto mention how you guys probably have day chat but forgot to talk to each other in the thread and now you vote to keep suspicion away from yourself. I don't think his unvote was protecting himself, but just from a bad choice by voting Sakura.tiper wrote:
@fartownik: I just have nothing to ask Konei.
Finally:
Unvote: Sakura
Vote: Konei
Because his unvote looks like he's protecting himself from being FoSing by others.
I'm going to sleep, see you tommorow.
I already said my opinion about Irre, it's a bit hard to tell about Konei and tiper, because both voted with no reason at all, but Konei changed and gave a cheap reason of the why and then changed again as there was no basis on that vote, very suspicious for me if you ask, that and somehow starting the bandwagon against you. And about tiper dunno what to say, he just voted and answered some questions, nothing outstanding in my opinion.Sakura wrote:
@DakeDekane: What are your opinions on the 3 people that wagoned me outta nowhere?
Why am I keeping my vote on those, you're curious, aren't you? I could change my vote for Konei, as he already is suspicious enough, but I really want to gather more info from our missing people (it looks like two of them appeared finally) here before making my final decision, don't want that sudden 3 votes following bandwagon for Konei . those is still suspicious though, giving away Konei based on his last post? Who knows. But he's already in a lower level, but unvoting no lynch means nothing if he still can join the leading bandwagon, that's why I keep my vote on those.Sakura wrote:
@Dake: What makes you still keep your vote on those? he already removed his No-Lynch vote, and other than him not having much content I don't see much of a reason to keep the vote on him. If you still see him as scum would you care to try to sell us your case or reasonings?. Not gonna lie tho, I do have my FoS on him, but it's not stronger than my other FoSs and due to his lack of content he's null with a slight scum lean at best for me.
I don't have that feeling at all.Irreversible wrote:
@Konei: What do you say to the comment from those: 'Oh no I got caught'?
I pretty much wanted to see if anyone but me jumps on Sakura if I did and well,Raging Bull wrote:
@Konei who did you want to post and what answers do you want?
I meant they could come up with this in R1 as newbies. An experienced team would try to persuade others not to vote a potential scum in the first day.BRBP wrote:
They don't even have to be newbies to come up with this. Even though it's not really a good idea, it's sometimes better to just let go and accept that someone got caught. Trying too hard to save that one guy could lead to the other two being caught and lynched aswell.
I know what you meant I just wanted to add that an experienced team would probably find someone else (or make someone else) more suspicious instead of taking the chance of getting caught themselves while protecting the suspected scum.fandwerik wrote:
I meant they could come up with this in R1 as newbies. An experienced team would try to persuade others not to vote a potential scum.BRBP wrote:
They don't even have to be newbies to come up with this. Even though it's not really a good idea, it's sometimes better to just let go and accept that someone got caught. Trying too hard to save that one guy could lead to the other two being caught and lynched aswell.
Simply, if i don't post ,i won't evoke suspicions against me,don't you think so?Also i'm still not so talkative person , but i think BRBP talks way too much,haha.Sakura wrote:
@ReVeNg3r: So you say you're an "outsider" when you're a player of the game? What makes you say that? Why aren't you providing any content?
those wrote:
I would love to believe roles are randomized amongst players to avoid any bias.
I just don't know how exactly he does it.mod wrote:
I'll randomly assign you one
What. You are going to vote someone who you think is town? Not exactly helpfulReVeNg3r wrote:
Simply, if i don't post ,i won't evoke suspicions against me,don't you think so?Also i'm still not so talkative person , but i think BRBP talks way too much,haha.
So i think i know who is next who will get my vote after D1,even though i think he is townie. Now you can guess why i do this .
If all members would be newbie,then what this game would be about...Just believe me,i bet at least one of those "rednamed" is mafiaBRBP wrote:
I don't believe your threory about assigning more experienced players to mafia to balance the game.
lol,thxfartownik wrote:
I SAID VOTE REVENGER, BUT YOU WERE LIKE "NO, NO, NO"
NOW EAT THIS
True.BRBP wrote:
Okay. My guess is that you have no clue what you're doing here.
BRBP wrote:
Are you saying that all BATs are automatically pro?
ReVeNg3r wrote:
at least one of those "rednamed" is mafia.
Maybe he's Karthus or Kog'Maw. Or Zyra.BRBP wrote:
Even if your role is to get lynched, that's not how you do it.
Nice guess.those wrote:
Maybe he's Karthus or Kog'Maw. Or Zyra.BRBP wrote:
Even if your role is to get lynched, that's not how you do it.
Raging Bull wrote:
What. You are going to vote someone who you think is town? Not exactly helpfulReVeNg3r wrote:
Simply, if i don't post ,i won't evoke suspicions against me,don't you think so?Also i'm still not so talkative person , but i think BRBP talks way too much,haha.
So i think i know who is next who will get my vote after D1,even though i think he is townie. Now you can guess why i do this .
Dunno.Raging Bull wrote:
Also can you pleeeassee answer why the hell would you vote someone you think is townie.
What do you mean?fartownik wrote:
@ReVeNg3r: ARE YOU SCUM?!
Now i could give you the same question ,but already know the answer.So i give another,do you think i am scum?Raging Bull wrote:
Vote:ReVeNg3r
I don't know about jester role, but he really doesn't seem helpful at all. Gave him a question and he says dunno. Apparently now he will go back to where he came from, probably means not going to look at thread anymore.
Unvote.Konei wrote:
Well, in this case.
Unvote.
Vote: ReVeNg3r
just lol'dBRBP wrote:
The OMGUS is strong with this one.
I have positive opinion to you but unforunately given to situation where we are its either me or you .Konei wrote:
I wouldn't have expected that he would just vote me because I vote him to get attention on him.
Well, I guess I'll wait if some guys change their opinion of me.
Because at least he contributes something. Revenge is fishy too ,but he doesn't even do anything to help or defend himself.fartownik wrote:
A question to Raging Bull.
Why don't you vote Konei? You said he looks fishy for you as well in the previous posts, again why to vote an unhelpful person instead of a suspicious one?
Same question? I wouldn't vote anyone I think is town unless they started playing suspiciously or doing something scummy. And it's not just because of the answer that I voted for you, it's because you don't even try to answer my question besides a "dunno"ReVeNg3r wrote:
Happens exactly what i wrote.Now i could give you the same question ,but already know the answer.So i give another,do you think i am scum?Raging Bull wrote:
Vote:ReVeNg3r
I don't know about jester role, but he really doesn't seem helpful at all. Gave him a question and he says dunno. Apparently now he will go back to where he came from, probably means not going to look at thread anymore.
and i said "i think i know who will be next for me" ,not final decesion yet..even because of this you want lynch me?its just stupid
I think, it is easy to get that we couldn't take her down. Why? Because of the following actions which you can see below my "Vote: Sakura".Konei wrote:
@tiper: why did you decide to vote Sakura after me and Irreversible did? Having you just writing "just wanted to see her reaction" ( t/132424/start=135 ) is a bit strange. Could you possibly explain this more, since now I'm guessing you just wanted to take Sakura out because 2 of us were on her.
because I am trying to get ReVeNg3r since I expect more support here and I think if you really aretiper wrote:
I think, it is easy to get that we couldn't take her down. Why? Because of the following actions which you can see below my "Vote: Sakura".Konei wrote:
@tiper: why did you decide to vote Sakura after me and Irreversible did? Having you just writing "just wanted to see her reaction" ( t/132424/start=135 ) is a bit strange. Could you possibly explain this more, since now I'm guessing you just wanted to take Sakura out because 2 of us were on her.
@Konei: why did you unvote me if I'm looking so strange for you ?