Hey! From my queue~
sorry for delay, shit exams are shit
EasyReplayNot much to say from a play I guess hehe, just some nazi patterning things
00:02:424 (3) - should be the same slider as (1), you can just copy+paste and rotate 180 and it'll be in basically the right place
00:20:024 (1,2,3) - This could be a little more interesting, try this maybe?
00:24:024 (4) - node 1 to x320 y84, node 2 to x256 y112, node 3 to x180 y80, little better symmetry (adjust notes around for spacing
)
00:33:224 (1,3) - symmetry on these two is off too, I'd recommend using ^this slider to improve them
01:03:624 (2) - move up to y324, looks a bit better compared to (3,4,1)
01:15:224 (3,1,2) - x412 y92, x428 y228, x344 y316 in that order for symmetry over x axis
01:21:224 (3) - one grid right
NormalReplayoh noes, a couple 100's. I'm so bad ;_;
00:03:624 (4) - oh why not, grid right, pattern/spacing
00:08:424 (3) - x164 y144 for the triangle
00:09:824 (5) - second point to x480 y48, so that it's on the same angle as (1) after
00:16:024 (3) - grid space left for blanket
00:52:824 (2,3,4) - x212 y264, x304 y208, x376 y124 in that order. This puts 5 along a similar upwards curve as (1,2,3,4) which I think makes more sense
01:04:824 (4) - clap on tick here is considerably softer than the claps around it
01:07:224 (2,3,4) - clean up the blanket pattern here, it's off and not symmetrical
01:25:024 (4,1) - I would recommend ending (4) on 01:25:424 (silenced if you want) and starting (1) on the downbeat for consistency
AsprikaQ's HardReplayVery nice, some of the early stacking beats are just a
little uncomfortable to play, specifically 00:08:624 (1,2,3,4,5), but overall great
00:00:224 (1) - I think you could start this on the blue tick where the actual drum starts, there's no tempo beforehand so it shouldn't make that big of a difference
00:08:624 (1,2,3,4,5) - I recommend this rhythm to ease up on this part
00:22:424 (3) - up a grid for patterning
00:32:424 (6) - x228 y120 for triangle
01:01:424 (4,1) - Jump seems a little out of place. I'd recommend having (3,4) be x164 y260 and x140 y180, so it's less jarring
01:12:224 (5,1) - While this does fit well with the music, I feel like for this being the "easier" hard, it might be a bit much, and a lot of less skilled players will end up breaking combo here. Consider taking it down to around 2.20x or so
01:25:624 (1,2) - why don't you do this rhythm for all three closing notes? so 01:26:824 and 01:28:024
SSS's Hard+ReplayHmm..not sure what to think of this diff. Imo it's very nearly harder than the insane, due to the jumps here being more jarring and quite a bit higher. Couple spacing things that didn't agree with me either
00:09:624 (2,3) - Didn't like this at all. I'd suggest rotating it 90 so that it leads to and from the previous notes better
00:31:224 (1,2,3) - mmmmmmmmm rough to play. and not exactly fun either. the slow slider speed contrasts the pretty quick jump
00:59:824 (8,1) - this doesn't flow well, I think a ctrl+g on (1) feels better
01:07:224 (2,1) - still isn't fun to play this
01:22:224 (2,3,4) - this jump would make sense if you delete (2) and shift (3,4) over a red tick, so that the jump happens on the trumpet note
InsaneReplaySome nice things happening here. I like the use of short slider to long slider like 00:01:424 (2,3), plays well and gives it a pretty interesting rhythm without resorting to excessive triplet streams
00:03:024 (3,4) - Here I would recommend going with this rhythm, as it fits better with the vocal and gives you a little more variation. (feel free to apply this wherever you feel it fits well)
00:28:024 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Here, this pattern should have two clean-looking stars :3
SPOILER224,320,28024,5,0,0:0:0:0:
322,352,28224,1,0,0:0:0:0:
381,269,28424,1,8,0:0:0:0:
322,186,28624,1,0,0:0:0:0:
224,218,28824,5,0,0:0:0:0:
158,139,29024,1,0,0:0:0:0:
216,55,29224,1,8,0:0:0:0:
314,83,29424,1,0,0:0:0:0:
00:52:224 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^
SPOILER254,104,52224,1,0,0:0:0:0:
326,80,52424,1,8,0:0:0:0:
372,139,52624,1,0,0:0:0:0:
327,202,52824,1,0,0:0:0:0:
254,178,53024,1,0,0:0:0:0:
209,239,53224,1,8,0:0:0:0:
253,301,53424,1,0,0:0:0:0:
326,279,53624,1,0,0:0:0:0:
00:55:224 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - why don't you gradually increase the spacing here, like the first set one 1.2 like it is and maybe the second at 1.4? would work with the buildup in music
01:26:824 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Don't have less spacing than you did for 01:25:624 (1,2,3,4)! it's so anti-climatic haha
All I got. Good luck!