Naruto...too boring.
But I like Elfen Lied, I finished the whole anime and manga.Wassaaaa wrote:
I don't hate any anime but there are some borings for me like K, Hyouka, Mirai Nikki and Elfen Lied.
you can see my list of MAL :3
omg But K, Mirai Nikki, and Elfen Lied are all so good. Not sure about Hyouka since I haven't seen it.Wassaaaa wrote:
I don't hate any anime but there are some borings for me like K, Hyouka, Mirai Nikki and Elfen Lied.
you can see my list of MAL :3
So I would tell them two, how dare they non watch as good anime as Clannad? We all have different tastes and some people aren't going to watch an anime just because everyone does and is popular (I think I sounded very hipster )makkura wrote:
clashe wrote:
I could not make it past the second episode of Clannad.
This
funny, as I just watched it recentlyStatic Noise Bird wrote:
Naruto,SAO, Bleach, K-On!, Kill Me Baby and many more!
Kamixdesu wrote:
I refuse to watch Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica ._. (I heard that it's very sad)
At the moment I just don't have a desire to watch a sad anime.
Only if you didn't watch more than the first 2 episodes.AzerFrost wrote:
Madoka - I feel like this targetted an audience of 7 year old girls.
Really? I didn't even notice it cause I'm not a stickler on these things. It's not like they showed her ass or boobs or anything.taysongnian wrote:
SAO
1. Fanservice - E.g Kirito vs Eugene http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52cDhvZVmuo#t=253 really...? Was that needed?
lol you seem like quite the prudetaysongnian wrote:
SAO
1. Fanservice - E.g Kirito vs Eugene http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52cDhvZVmuo#t=253 really...? Was that needed?
And of course, episode 4. It's NSFW so i'm not gonna post it here.
2. Incest - Nothing to be elaborated on here. Just.. wtf.
The thing is, they weren't consistent in such content. Up to episode 4, i took SAO seriously and thought it would easily be one of my top 5. Then.. episode 4 came and took that away. Am i suppose to expect fanservice? or should i continue to view the anime seriously. From episode 5 onward, there was an absence of that and i shrugged off episode 4. For example: Kirito vs Kuradeel. Kirito vs Heathcliff. You don't see Asuna in the sidelines making orgasmic noises and "*gasp* kirito-kun!*gasp*" or flaunt her ass and boobs. I don't want to find anymore examples since this pretty much already proves my point.Babukus wrote:
Really? I didn't even notice it cause I'm not a stickler on these things. It's not like they showed her ass or boobs or anything.
That's nothing. lol There are plenty of worse things with stupid fanservice moments.
Only the minority seriously cares about this (in things like SAO).
That's strange. I watched Ikki Tousen with great ease. I was already expecting fanservice and finally watched it. But that already meant i wouldn't recommend it to anyone unless we were discussing highschool dxd or highschool of the dead.mathexpert9981 wrote:
lol you seem like quite the prude
Well the animation was realistic though but I just started watching the first episode on Crunchyroll.The Winner Man wrote:
The animation for Aku no Hana is so bad that the animators should go eat a pile of shit. Same goes for the makers of the ed.
It's not the best rotoscoping but not everything needs to be generic anime or moe. They made an artistic choice that was definitely risky and within the context of the show, it pays off. Rotoscoping requires pretty much double their available budget to make it more than what it is, but the lack of quality in some of the movement adds to the overall ambiance.The Winner Man wrote:
The animation for Aku no Hana is so bad that the animators should go eat a pile of shit. Same goes for the makers of the ed.
I will agree the animation style was weird but, I think I can overlook it if the story is good.Koro McAlpine wrote:
Well the animation was realistic though but I just started watching the first episode on Crunchyroll.The Winner Man wrote:
The animation for Aku no Hana is so bad that the animators should go eat a pile of shit. Same goes for the makers of the ed.
Maybe that's the reason why...The Winner Man wrote:
The story is fine its just that it the people move like a penguin bobbling side to side and its really creepy how they looks when they open their mouths. I mean at first I saw the background and stuff so I thought it would be pretty nice. Then I saw the people which made me scared of the characters themselves and not how dark the story was. Like Nakamura is supposed to look somewhat sinister or something like that but I can't see that because her head looks like a talking potato.
It sure was. That's why I'm getting addicted to it, but couldn't wait for the second episode to be free on Crunchyroll next week.Outsanity wrote:
I will agree the animation style was weird but, I think I can overlook it if the story is good.
Is it making you uncomfortable?The Winner Man wrote:
The story is fine its just that it the people move like a penguin bobbling side to side and its really creepy how they looks when they open their mouths. I mean at first I saw the background and stuff so I thought it would be pretty nice. Then I saw the people which made me scared of the characters themselves and not how dark the story was. Like Nakamura is supposed to look somewhat sinister or something like that but I can't see that because her head looks like a talking potato.
It didn't really pay off, the sales bombed.Mogsworth wrote:
It's not the best rotoscoping but not everything needs to be generic anime or moe. They made an artistic choice that was definitely risky and within the context of the show, it pays off. Rotoscoping requires pretty much double their available budget to make it more than what it is, but the lack of quality in some of the movement adds to the overall ambiance.The Winner Man wrote:
The animation for Aku no Hana is so bad that the animators should go eat a pile of shit. Same goes for the makers of the ed.
Seriously, the content of the show is such that if it had moe art (or hell, even the original art to an extent), it would come across as fetishizing the content as opposed to actually framing the actions for what they are: evil.
smdh otaku. See things in an artistic context.
>that manages to workMogsworth wrote:
If yes, it's adding to the aesthetic and doing its job.
It doesn't want the viewer to like it, it wants the viewer to feel as uneasy and nervous as possible. And the animation does a good job of that. It's not like Higurashi, which is just filled with bad animation purely due to budget, but this is a budget rotoscope that manages to work due to its aesthetic choices.
Of course they did. It's not something that appeals to the status quo, therefore it's not selling well.Sotodashi wrote:
It didn't really pay off, the sales bombed.
Yet again, the technical incompetence adding to the ambiance is completely unintentional but wholly effective. It adds to the aesthetic. I don't like how it looks but it makes me uncomfortable, along with the rest of the presentation in each episode aired so far. So it's doing its job.Sotodashi wrote:
>that manages to work
One might be feeling uncomfortable due to the animation and art being shit.