1. mp3 bitrate is 320 kb/s. You know what to do. (I'm dumb and can't use Audacity, sorry)
2. Add [Luanny] to the tags.

1. 00:36:073 (2) - Remove the whistle from the body of this slider. Sounds really odd. Normally, I don't really have a problem with them, but this one is pretty loud.
2. 00:50:254 (2) - ^
3. 01:38:254 (2) - Shift this slider up a bit so that you can align it's end with the start of (4). Symmetry, yay.
4. 02:20:313 (1,1) - You should probably give newer players more time after the spinner to recover before going straight into an object at the next beat. My solution would be to shorten the slider right after the spinner and move it closer to (2), like this.
5. 03:18:677 (2,3) - Whistles on the bodies of these sliders are loud.

1. 00:00:073 (1) - Move this two grids to the right so that it aligns with (3). I'm not a fan of lopsided triangles.
2. 00:07:709 (3) - Tilt this slider diagonally so that it appears parallel to (4).
3. 00:41:527 (4,1,1) - This arrangement of sliders looks a bit cluttered. I would unstack (1) from under (4) and then rearrange the following objects to your liking. It'd be worth it.
4. 01:08:800 (2) - Move the node of this slider to be positioned like this. 01:07:709 (1) flows into it better like this. (2) also flows better into the next circle (aesthetically, I suppose).
5. 01:45:891 (1,2) - Fit the end of (1) more neatly onto (2)'s track.
6. 02:20:586 (1) - The end of this spinner is unsnapped ever so slightly. You need to snap it to the new timing section. Also, it should probably start on the next red tick rather than on a white tick since it currently doesn't follow the music very well as it is. While starting on the red tick, it starts on the vocals.
7. 03:16:495 (4) - Slidertrack whistle ew
8. 03:18:677 (2,4) - ^

1. 01:21:891 (4,5,6) - Has relatively bad flow since with (4,5) it appears you're going downward, but (6) suddenly moves upward. I'm pretty sure the solution to this is self-explanatory.
2. 02:21:955 (1) - Slider should be snapped to the next timing section. It's by like 5 ms, but oh well.
3. 02:35:586 (3,4) - I read this as if (4) was directly 1/2 after (3). I would unstack (4) so that the approach circle is more easily readable.
4. 02:37:631 (3,4) - I'm not a fan of this barely-overlap.

Jacob wrote:

[General]

1. mp3 bitrate is 320 kb/s. You know what to do. (I'm dumb and can't use Audacity, sorry) oops
2. Add [Luanny] to the tags. ok

[Easy]

1. 00:36:073 (2) - Remove the whistle from the body of this slider. Sounds really odd. Normally, I don't really have a problem with them, but this one is pretty loud. ok
2. 00:50:254 (2) - ^ ok
3. 01:38:254 (2) - Shift this slider up a bit so that you can align it's end with the start of (4). Symmetry, yay. ok
4. 02:20:313 (1,1) - You should probably give newer players more time after the spinner to recover before going straight into an object at the next beat. My solution would be to shorten the slider right after the spinner and move it closer to (2), like this. nah, I did this before and shouldn't be a problem at all..
5. 03:18:677 (2,3) - Whistles on the bodies of these sliders are loud. fixed

[Normal]

1. 00:00:073 (1) - Move this two grids to the right so that it aligns with (3). I'm not a fan of lopsided triangles. ok
2. 00:07:709 (3) - Tilt this slider diagonally so that it appears parallel to (4). nah, like it the way it is
3. 00:41:527 (4,1,1) - This arrangement of sliders looks a bit cluttered. I would unstack (1) from under (4) and then rearrange the following objects to your liking. It'd be worth it. uhh ok
4. 01:08:800 (2) - Move the node of this slider to be positioned like this. 01:07:709 (1) flows into it better like this. (2) also flows better into the next circle (aesthetically, I suppose). done
5. 01:45:891 (1,2) - Fit the end of (1) more neatly onto (2)'s track. done
6. 02:20:586 (1) - The end of this spinner is unsnapped ever so slightly. You need to snap it to the new timing section. Also, it should probably start on the next red tick rather than on a white tick since it currently doesn't follow the music very well as it is. While starting on the red tick, it starts on the vocals. ehhh I tried to fix the snapping problem, but it's surely fine placed where it is.
7. 03:16:495 (4) - Slidertrack whistle ew fixed
8. 03:18:677 (2,4) - ^ fixed

[Hard]

1. 01:21:891 (4,5,6) - Has relatively bad flow since with (4,5) it appears you're going downward, but (6) suddenly moves upward. I'm pretty sure the solution to this is self-explanatory. I sincerely like the way it is now for some reason. I'll leave it like that
2. 02:21:955 (1) - Slider should be snapped to the next timing section. It's by like 5 ms, but oh well. fixed
3. 02:35:586 (3,4) - I read this as if (4) was directly 1/2 after (3). I would unstack (4) so that the approach circle is more easily readable. fixed
4. 02:37:631 (3,4) - I'm not a fan of this barely-overlap. I like it ):

Phew. There's part one of my mod. I'll mod the remaining two difficulties most likely tomorrow.

1. 03:27:404 (1) - The slider track of this heart slider in all of the difficulties except easy should be silenced. It kinda kills the atmosphere of the song.

1. 00:04:845 (3,4) - Meh overlap.
2. 00:12:754 (9) - While playing this, I thought this would be a short repeat slider due to the previous one, but it wasn't, causing me to 100 this and miss the next couple of notes. I would add a reverse arrow to this and put a circle after it rather than a slider stacked under it.
3. 01:28:436 (6) - NC here due to the slider speed change.
4. 02:46:495 (3) - Don't know why, but this slider looks better with the node moved like this.

1. 00:01:436 (1,2,3) - This antijump is random and you don't do it anywhere else in the beginning part, so I would just remove it to avoid possible complaints about readability. Also because it's silly.
2. 00:31:709 (5,6) - This could be made way more appealing.
3. 02:12:468 (2,3) - It's very difficult to tell that these are in 1/3 since they use relatively the same spacing as the 1/2 notes in this section.

Jacob wrote:

I'm not dumb anymore and figured out how to re-encode the mp3. Here you go. I'm pretty sure that after you apply this new mp3, you MAY need to fix the offset (I haven't tried it yet) and move all of the inherited (and uninherited) timing sections by the same offset. You'll also have to adjust the storyboard too. Yikes.

[General]

1. 03:27:404 (1) - The slider track of this heart slider in all of the difficulties except easy should be silenced. It kinda kills the atmosphere of the song.

I like how it sounds now

[Insane]

1. 00:04:845 (3,4) - Meh overlap. I really like this one
2. 00:12:754 (9) - While playing this, I thought this would be a short repeat slider due to the previous one, but it wasn't, causing me to 100 this and miss the next couple of notes. I would add a reverse arrow to this and put a circle after it rather than a slider stacked under it. nahhh I really like the way it is now
3. 01:28:436 (6) - NC here due to the slider speed change. done
4. 02:46:495 (3) - Don't know why, but this slider looks better with the node moved like this. I like the way it flows right now

[Nogard]

1. 00:01:436 (1,2,3) - This antijump is random and you don't do it anywhere else in the beginning part, so I would just remove it to avoid possible complaints about readability. Also because it's silly. meeeeeeeh ok
2. 00:31:709 (5,6) - This could be made way more appealing. that'd be a bit flow-breaking though
3. 02:12:468 (2,3) - It's very difficult to tell that these are in 1/3 since they use relatively the same spacing as the 1/2 notes in this section. uh there's not much to do here. and I sincerely think these are readable/playable.

Blue Dragon wrote:

Jacob wrote:

[*]02:12:468 (2,3) - It's very difficult to tell that these are in 1/3 since they use relatively the same spacing as the 1/2 notes in this section. uh there's not much to do here. and I sincerely think these are readable/playable.

Zarerion wrote:

just saying, these 1/3 are pretty well playable for me.
And I don't really see how your suggestion would improve the readability, Jacob.

ThisManzzz wrote:

What's the actual name of this song? Is it just BD's own Mash-up? I can't find this song anywhere (except on the osu! website) with this name.

inverness wrote:

ultra nazi point-outs

on tags it should be Amber Supernova not Amber Starlight lel
and why there's banana? :V

Ultimate wrote:

WTF happend to the insane diff?!!
It's all different
i miss the older version, was much better :O!!

Blue Dragon wrote:

Ultimate wrote:

WTF happend to the insane diff?!!
It's all different
i miss the older version, was much better :O!!

uh? o.o

I didn't change it, at least severely

there is Insane and Nogard, are you sure you accidentally didn't play the wrong diff?

[Luanny] wrote:

best rating ever