From our queue \( ^_^)/

1. Offset -10.

1. 00:01:900 (1) - Add whistle on end?
2. 00:04:494 (1) - ^
3. 00:10:332 (1,2) - Make blanket plz.
4. 00:21:359 (3) - Remove clap.
5. 00:15:835 (2) - Remove finish here, unecessary
6. 01:00:268 (1,2) - Muted notes are unrankable !
7. 01:37:889 (1,2) - Blanket plz.

1. Rename to Standard? lol only suggestion
2. CS3 please www
3. AR, HP, OD -1
4. 00:05:781 (3) - Remove 1 reverse plz.
5. 00:26:376 (3) - Split into 2 sliders?
6. 00:40:484 (6) - Move this into 00:40:322 - for better polarity and music flow?
7. 00:43:079 (5) - Similar to ^
8. 01:00:268 (1,2) - Muted notes are unrankable !
9. 01:02:700 (4) - Split into 2 sliders please
10. 01:06:430 (5) - For all notes like this, please treat them just like 00:40:484 (6) -
11. 01:33:835 (3) - Split plz

cirno- wrote:

General
I think pure white combo color is unrankable. Make it very light gray. Hurts some people's eyes during kiai time iirc.

Standard
AR+1
OD+1 or 2

00:45:988 to 00:49:879 - why not focus on the instrumentation?

Hyper and Another felt flawless to me.

Sorry for the small mod, I really couldn't find much and I give up after spending too much time looking for something.

1. Sometimes i think, that Slider Tick Rate 2 will fit better. Just think about it.
2. There's no need to have audio lead in. 1800~ms is enough for this music.
3. Didn't like break in Easy and Standard diffs. It's too short remove it or make a bigger one, please!

1. Beginner with AR3? ha-ha, I don't think that we're able to call this diff beginner. It's more like well-mapped [Easy]. (AR-1) (or rename diff - not recommended :<)
2. 00:01:879 (1) - clap here (reverse) sounds weird. And it's off your patterns, too. So, just remove it or replace with whistle.
3. 00:03:339 - it'll be great if you end slider here somehow. (preferable, if you'll do it without making slider 1/4 longer) (try to do it the same way as you did it at 00:07:393 (1,2) )
4. 00:04:474 (1) - there's NO clap, at least SO LOUD clap, I think you should use whistle or make this cap less loud. >.</
5. 00:15:177 (1) - flow (nazi) - I think, that it'll be better if you will move this circle to (x 256 y212) actuall it will give you better flow, imo. like this - just to avoid boring patterns and make it a bit different
6. 00:35:285 - i guess you need circle here t be consistent with previous SIMILAR pattern. (00:31:717 (2,3,1) - as you can see, there's a circle, and it sounds totally like 00:35:285 - so it'll be great if you put circle here.
7. 00:48:582 (1,1,1) - three new combos in a row plays a bit awkward. What if you'll try to do something like this - it will be hardest pattern in this diffs, but i guess it worth it. Because music here goes faster and you should try to follow it!
8. 01:19:717 (1,2) - x1.28 here? Really? Oh, c'mon! This is unacceptable for EASIEST diff! It's easy diff, how do you want beginners to play JUMPY diffs? :V Probably they will be so confused, you'd better avoid things like this.
9. 01:43:069 (1) - for all diffs - I guess you should try using 5% Volume Soft section becausesong just fades out! There's no ANY hitsound, and spinner should be silinced.
   
   didn't like your comboing. Maybe it's just me, anyway.

1. You have a good flow here. it's also consistent, so HP Drain: 4 will make it funnier
2. 00:03:339 (2,3) - it's just weird! you have x0.6 DS here, why? There's no any reasons to do it, plays weird, imo. So, try to remove it.
3. 00:07:069 (1) - these antijumps make no sense. They're just confusing to play! Probably, players will click it 1/2 earlier becauuse of broken spacing.
4. 00:20:041 (1,1,1) - I don't feel like there's any GOOD reason for NC spam. By the way, you have aonly 2 combo colours, and NC spam looks boring! That's why I want you to avoid doing it
5. 00:27:663 (1) - oh..no! spacing again! It's too big for antijump and too small for regular spacing! (by the way, 00:30:096 (5) - there's spacing x0.2 bigger! why? Try to be more consistent)
6. 01:02:690 (4) - critical - I think this slider totally breaks your rhythm/flow because this one has TWO reverses when other sliders have only one. It's confusing for normal players. Because rhythm is quite fast here and they probably will not notice second reverse!
   
   I think you're using too many1/2s. This is normal (standard) diff!

1. 00:03:177 (4) - opinion - it will look better if you put new combo here. Actually, sounds/looks like new pattern is started here
2. 00:12:906 (3,1) - nazi - i think it'll be great if you try to make blanket sliders perfect here. Just a nazi, so you're free to ignore.
3. 00:24:744 (1) - hey! try to replace it with circle and slider! It will give a "growing effect" this way (ignore exra NC on this screenshot)
4. 00:57:663 (1,2) - why don't you replace oneor two sliders with stream? It will be great and of cousrse it's allowed because this is [Hyper]
   
   Just a good Hyper diff. Seems pretty enjoyable, even though aren't perfect slidars and a bit too fast (in my opinion) sliders .

1. How about OD: 8? i think it will be awesome here! Just Imagine how fun this map will be for skilled players!
2. 00:52:393 (2,3) - nazi - I'd manually unstack them this way to make this looks the way better and more readable for hidden-players.
3. 00:57:015 (1,12,13,14,15,16,17) - rhythm in the end feels a bit different. I'd replace 4 or 5 circles in the end of stream with slider. By the way, it will help you to avoid too long combo chain. (let's keep numbers under 16, ok?)
4. 01:04:961 (4,5) - a bit too suddenly, but I like it. It flows great, if you will notice this jump in time. Just saying that it appears too suddenly.
5. 01:32:690 (1) - instead of slowdown, I'd replace it with circle because silence will fit better here, imo. example.jpg
   
   Well mapped.

-Bakari- wrote:

Hi. Forum-pm request.

Please tell me what you've fied or not. If not - why! It will help me to be more helpful next time!

first of all, what diff are you talking about in Creator's Word? There's no any Normal! Did you mean Standard? oh it was my fault haha yes it means Standard diff

[General]

1. Sometimes i think, that Slider Tick Rate 2 will fit better. Just think about it. not fixed
2. There's no need to have audio lead in. 1800~ms is enough for this music. Fixed!
3. Didn't like break in Easy and Standard diffs. It's too short remove it or make a bigger one, please! will think about it more

[Beginner]

1. Beginner with AR3? ha-ha, I don't think that we're able to call this diff beginner. It's more like well-mapped [Easy]. (AR-1) (or rename diff - not recommended :<)Fixed!
2. 00:01:879 (1) - clap here (reverse) sounds weird. And it's off your patterns, too. So, just remove it or replace with whistle. Fixed!
3. 00:03:339 - it'll be great if you end slider here somehow. (preferable, if you'll do it without making slider 1/4 longer) (try to do it the same way as you did it at 00:07:393 (1,2) ) Fixed!
4. 00:04:474 (1) - there's NO clap, at least SO LOUD clap, I think you should use whistle or make this cap less loud. >.</ Fixed!
5. 00:15:177 (1) - flow (nazi) - I think, that it'll be better if you will move this circle to (x 256 y212) actuall it will give you better flow, imo. like this - just to avoid boring patterns and make it a bit different Fixed!
6. 00:35:285 - i guess you need circle here t be consistent with previous SIMILAR pattern. (00:31:717 (2,3,1) - as you can see, there's a circle, and it sounds totally like 00:35:285 - so it'll be great if you put circle here. Fixed!
7. 00:48:582 (1,1,1) - three new combos in a row plays a bit awkward. What if you'll try to do something like this - it will be hardest pattern in this diffs, but i guess it worth it. Because music here goes faster and you should try to follow it! Fixed!
8. 01:19:717 (1,2) - x1.28 here? Really? Oh, c'mon! This is unacceptable for EASIEST diff! It's easy diff, how do you want beginners to play JUMPY diffs? :V Probably they will be so confused, you'd better avoid things like this. Fixed!
9. 01:43:069 (1) - for all diffs - I guess you should try using 5% Volume Soft section becausesong just fades out! There's no ANY hitsound, and spinner should be silinced. Fixed!
   
   didn't like your comboing. Maybe it's just me, anyway.

[Standard]

1. You have a good flow here. it's also consistent, so HP Drain: 4 will make it funnier Fixed!
2. 00:03:339 (2,3) - it's just weird! you have x0.6 DS here, why? There's no any reasons to do it, plays weird, imo. So, try to remove it. Fixed!
3. 00:07:069 (1) - these antijumps make no sense. They're just confusing to play! Probably, players will click it 1/2 earlier becauuse of broken spacing. Fixed!
4. 00:20:041 (1,1,1) - I don't feel like there's any GOOD reason for NC spam. By the way, you have aonly 2 combo colours, and NC spam looks boring! That's why I want you to avoid doing it Fixed!
5. 00:27:663 (1) - oh..no! spacing again! It's too big for antijump and too small for regular spacing! (by the way, 00:30:096 (5) - there's spacing x0.2 bigger! why? Try to be more consistent) Fixed!
6. 01:02:690 (4) - critical - I think this slider totally breaks your rhythm/flow because this one has TWO reverses when other sliders have only one. It's confusing for normal players. Because rhythm is quite fast here and they probably will not notice second reverse! Fixed!
   
   I think you're using too many1/2s. This is normal (standard) diff!

[Hyper]

1. 00:03:177 (4) - opinion - it will look better if you put new combo here. Actually, sounds/looks like new pattern is started here Fixed!
2. 00:12:906 (3,1) - nazi - i think it'll be great if you try to make blanket sliders perfect here. Just a nazi, so you're free to ignore. Fixed!
3. 00:24:744 (1) - hey! try to replace it with circle and slider! It will give a "growing effect" this way (ignore exra NC on this screenshot) Fixed!
4. 00:57:663 (1,2) - why don't you replace oneor two sliders with stream? It will be great and of cousrse it's allowed because this is [Hyper] Fixed!
   
   Just a good Hyper diff. Seems pretty enjoyable, even though aren't perfect slidars and a bit too fast (in my opinion) sliders .

[Another]

1. How about OD: 8? i think it will be awesome here! Just Imagine how fun this map will be for skilled players! Fixed!
2. 00:52:393 (2,3) - nazi - I'd manually unstack them this way to make this looks the way better and more readable for hidden-players. Fixed!
3. 00:57:015 (1,12,13,14,15,16,17) - rhythm in the end feels a bit different. I'd replace 4 or 5 circles in the end of stream with slider. By the way, it will help you to avoid too long combo chain. (let's keep numbers under 16, ok?) Fixed!
4. 01:04:961 (4,5) - a bit too suddenly, but I like it. It flows great, if you will notice this jump in time. Just saying that it appears too suddenly. not fixed
5. 01:32:690 (1) - instead of slowdown, I'd replace it with circle because silence will fit better here, imo. example.jpg Fixed!
   
   Well mapped.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can improve easier diffs a bit more, but harder ones are good. I think i need to practice more haha

1. Inconsistency in uninherited (red) timing sections
2. Inconsistency in combo colours
3. Inconsistency in Kiai Times
4. Inconsistency in AudioLeadIn 전부 0으로
5. Offset +(6~10)

1. 00:04:150 - 사운드가 너무 강함, 노트 추가
2. 00:40:150 (2) - 1그리드 올려서 00:37:555 (2) - 에 스택
3. 00:51:177 (3) - 뉴콤
4. 00:52:474 (4) - 그냥 3번 복붙하면 됄거같은데
5. 00:56:366 (1) - 뉴콤 필요없을거같음
   전체적으로 피니시 사운드가 많으니까 그냥 피시니 팍팍 넣어도 돼

1. 00:25:231 (1) - 스피너 뒤에 너무 일찍 나오는듯

1. 00:03:501 (7) - 1그리드 내려야 패턴 완벽해짐

1. Bitrate of the map must be between 128kbps and 192kbps, the bitrate right now is 320 kbps.

1. 01:03:509 (3,1,2) - the slight overlap kind of looks odd to me (not really major but it is recommended)

1. 01:16:644 - Maybe make the rhythm like this?
   
   Sure it's a little harder, but it's the climax of the song and things usually get a little harder at times like these, even for the second diff. If it gets too hard, maybe you can replace it with a repeating slider or a normal slider. Just don't do the rhythm at 01:17:779.
2. 01:19:239 - ^
3. 01:37:401 - ^
4. 01:39:996 - ^

1. 00:20:050 (1,1) - I don't really like those slider by themselves. Either make them longer or add more notes in between and after them.
2. 00:25:239 (4) - add NC
3. 00:26:374 (1) - remove NC
4. 00:28:482 (1) - ^
5. 00:31:563 (5) - ^

1. 00:20:050 (1,1) - same problem with [Another] but since this is the "easier" diff of the two, it might be better to make them longer sliders.
2. 00:25:239 (3) - add NC
3. 00:24:590 - 00:45:996 This part as a whole (and possibly more of this part in [Another] has to focus more on phrasing with your combos. Sometimes you make a new combo every one measure while in others it is every two measures. I suggest that you should make an NC every two measures.
4. 01:02:698 (4) - add NC (in this part, you can choose whether the combos should be every one measure or two. Just keep consistency.)
5. 01:33:185 (1) - remove note and make appropriate space changes
6. 01:34:320 (4,5,6,7) - a jump like this doesn't occur that much in the rest of the beatmap, I highly suggest changing it.

1. 00:02:536 - Maybe a note here.
2. 00:20:049 (1) - Try to put this note on x:262 (It fits the previous slider)
3. 00:48:590 (1) - I think that finish sound doesn't fit this reverse arrow.
4. 00:56:374 (3) - How about putting 2 small sliders here? (The music became more faster, so, more beats)
5. How about a slider with a reverse arrow that goes from here 01:00:266 to here 01:01:563?
6. 01:23:289 - Maybe a note here

1. 00:02:860 - Maybe a note here
2. 00:04:482 (1,2,3) - These notes are not placed correctly. Put them on x:16.
3. 00:32:536 - Maybe a note here
4. 00:45:509 (4) - The line of this slider is not straight. Fix it. ^^
5. 00:56:374 (1) - Look Easy Mod^

1. 00:52:482 (2) - This note is unnecessary
2. 01:14:050 (4) - How about a reverse arrow here? (take the 01:14:374 (1) out).
3. 01:22:320 (1) - How about a reverse arrow here? (take the 01:22:806 (2) out) - It's not the same thing as the previous point

1. if you mind, try to add one combo colours. imo, 2 combo colours are boring
   try this colours: http://puu.sh/1FOmP
   

   Combo1 : 184,3,157
   Combo2 : 227,227,227
   Combo3 : 243,12,87

2. better, not check letters box on storyboarding menu
   

1. Rythm:
   00:40:320 - add a note
   00:42:915 - ^
   00:47:131 - ^
   00:49:725 - ^
   00:51:023 - ^
   01:16:644 - ^
   01:37:401 - ^
   
2. Combo:
   00:08:698 - NC
   00:09:671 - remove NC
   01:22:320 - ^
   01:24:915 - ^
   01:31:401 - ^
   
3. Hits Sounds:
   00:12:266 - add whistle on the tail?
   00:47:293 (5) - add finish?
   00:57:023 (2) - add finish on the head
   01:32:698 - whistle on the tail?
   01:37:563 - change to clap

1. Combo color 2 blends too much with the BG. I suppose it needs to be changed.

1. 00:02:860 (5,6,7) - Move this pattern upward so it can be stacked under the end of (4)
2. 00:12:590 (1) - I don't think it's that great to mix finish and clap here. Maybe it would be better to remove this clap.
3. 00:17:455 (1) - This newcombo seems pointless. Consider removing it~
4. 00:22:644 (1) - A small jump would fit nicely with here. I would move this note to x:256 y:200. I don't care about whether you follow my suggestion or not, but it's highly suggested to make a jump here.
5. 00:27:509 - Feels empty with this section due to lack of notes. Add a note here to follow high pitch piano sound?
6. 00:34:158 (4) - I don't like how this slider is shaped differently from (3). You can make it a bit better by using 4 anchors for this slider. like this;
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:40:320 (9) - A curved slider will fit better with this kind of pattern imo. The current flow is kinda uncomfortable to me.
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 00:43:401 (1,2,3) - Adjust placement a bit so that it can look like a triangle like this?
   
   SPOILER

   
9. 00:45:833 (5,1) - I have no alternative for this pattern, but honestly the current one flows so badly imo. As far as I can see, I'm sure that you can make it more exciting.
10. 01:03:590 (8) - A clap here would be a nice accent. and I can hear an extra percussion in the music. not sure it fits your taste, but worth a try imo. same for 01:13:968 (9) - .
11. 01:05:455 - umm, personally dislike this heavy beat being ignored and you using a long slider here. it'll be more natural if you use shorter one and follow that emphasis. same for 01:15:671 (1) -
12. 01:11:941 (1) - Add a finish here. it should suit perfectly with the beginning of re-kiai, and more consistent with 01:01:563 (1) - .
13. 01:19:077 (7) - The end of this slider is too close to 01:18:752 (5) - imo. It wouldn't hurt anything to move it away.
    
    SPOILER

    
14. 01:26:860 (3,1) - Consider unstacking these notes, because you used so many 1/1 stacking in this part so it might be quite confusing even though this difficulty is an Insane.
15. 01:32:374 (4,1) - This spacing is too close imo. at first I thought it was 1/4. consider spacing them at higher DS.
16. 01:32:698 (5,1) - Since this point is quite characteristic, how about trying something different here? I would suggest something like this, it can fit nicely with the song and must be interesting!
    
    SPOILER

    
17. 01:34:725 (9) - Same as 01:03:590 (8) - , consider adding a clap here.
18. 01:36:590 - Same as 01:05:455 - , try to stop using a long slider and follow the emphasis better.
19. 01:40:482 (2,3,4) - Make these sliders more curved and space them at higher DS: these are more suitable for this kind of pattern and looks/flows better. like this:
    
    SPOILER

    
20. 01:43:077 (5) - I'm assuming you could hear the cymbal sound in the music.. anyway try to add a finish here. it would be more suitable for the end of this difficutly.

[Ranger] wrote:

[Fang's Hyper]
00:19:875 - 여기에 노트 추가해보시면 어떨까요? i use 3 hit reverse slider instead add a note
00:20:524 - ^ ^

TMAstraf wrote:

Fang's Hyper:
00:09:821 Maybe a little bit distance
00:10:794 This is a bit to far away from last circle
01:25:064 the Same like first

Sonnyc wrote:

Fang's Hyper:

-- 맵셋 상으로 저는 이 난이도를 하드로 취급하겠습니다. 아무튼, AR7 부탁합니다. Standard 난이도는 4인데, 격차가 너~무 크네요

00:21:497 (3,4) - 음악상 두개의 리듬이 서로 바뀌었습니다. 3연타 -> 클릭 -> 3연타 순서입니다. 현재박자 유지하겟습니다.
00:33:659 (3) - 4번쨰 점 1칸 내리는게 더 곡선 같네요
00:57:172 (1,2,3) - 이 노트들만 간격이 0.24x이네요. 수고스럽겠지만 0.30x과 더 가까이 맞출수 있으리라고 봅니다.
01:10:794 (7) - 2칸 오른쪽으로 하는게 슬라이더 끼리의 거리를 통일시킬수 있을거 같아요
01:20:361 (4) - (6)의 끝에 놓는건 어떨까요? 거리 유지를 위해 어쩔 수 없이..
01:42:091 (8) - (7)과 줄이 되게 해주세요

bbj0920 wrote:

[DF Hyper]
00:07:226 - whistle
01:00:740 (4) - whistle
01:21:821 (1) - finish
01:39:983 (1) - finish

Kitagami wrote:

Fang's Hyper

1. 00:03:497 (4) - I don't know... This slider disturbs the flow in my opinion... How about doing something like this?: accept your opinion
   
   Please, don't do the exactly same thing (only if doing, ofc, lol), since the spacing is totally wrong and I changed it like this just to check the flow.
   
   
   Not exaaaaactly like this, but you know, something like this "S" (not a perfect one) format formed by those two sliders. Something like this one 00:13:064 (1,2)
2. 00:27:983 (3,4) - And so again, I think this blanket looks a bit odd, since the tail of 00:27:983 (3) ends to one side and 00:28:470 (4) starts on the other side. See what I'm talking about here:
   
   What the player have to do.
   
   
   
   What would be more comfortable to do (at least, in my opinion).
   
   

Wah, I think I can't find anything else o.o

wzxxzw wrote:

이곡의 태고맵을 만들어도 되나요

1. You don't use a specific combo colour to determine a specific slider velocity. All slider velocity changes should be intuitive, and right now it appears you have a lot of new combo spam that is not required.
2. 01:23:444 (1,2,3) - Silence these slider ends or make them end 1/4 earlier at red. The crash cymbals have the same length as 00:16:309 (1,2,3) - and personally I don't see why they should be any different.

those wrote:

[Extra]

1. You don't use a specific combo colour to determine a specific slider velocity. All slider velocity changes should be intuitive, and right now it appears you have a lot of new combo spam that is not required.
   Well, I like it. Not changing a thing.
2. 01:23:444 (1,2,3) - Silence these slider ends or make them end 1/4 earlier at red.Silenced. The crash cymbals have the same length as 00:16:309 (1,2,3) - and personally I don't see why they should be any different. Deleted whistle from the end but didn't silence.

BounceBabe wrote:

Hard

00:09:811 (1) - Remove NC sorry to distinguish
00:19:541 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - Put them some Grids down to make the spacing better just for highlight them
00:41:433 (4) - Spacing, move it closer Hard players can read that. that's ok
01:24:406 - Add a circle here, fits good imo what?
01:32:190 (1) - Remove NC i just highlight that to follow music

Charles445 wrote:

[Fang's Hyper]
Faster sliders than Another?... Okay... haha.. idk about another when i mapping this diff
00:15:649 (1) - This looks a little funny, make it curve properly? little fixed
00:57:162 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Please don't have 185 bpm streams like this in the hyper. Making them kicksliders is alright like (9,10) oh.. i was worried about this stream. fix that

Aqo wrote:

ah...? Nice map but this [Another] feels like a [Normal]. Need more diff for spread >.<

Charles445 wrote:

Aqo wrote:

ah...? Nice map but this [Another] feels like a [Normal]. Need more diff for spread >.<

I disagree.
The -prototype- version of Evans is designed to follow a simpler beat. This allows it to be used for easier difficulties in the original games. With its simplistic design, it makes sense that there s no [Extra] - the song is not complicated enough.