Someone is evading the Rules... again.
Also.
Also.
Nice TAG mapKurisuchianu wrote:
Wait a second, why is in the tag "Taiko"?
ok
Blue Dragon wrote:
WHAT THE OH MY FUCKING GOD
OH GOD MAN OH MAN OH GOD OH MAN OH GOD MAN
I agree (as in "I agree that mods shouldn't change how a map has to be modded/fixed"), but I still find it funny that some people made rules about stuff that basically can't be played easily on Hidden but plays fine normally.Blue Dragon wrote:
That rule does not include HardRock-changed maps, so that'd be a stupid/unnecessary reason for the unrank. But if the childish haters would like it unranked so badly, oh well
Well idk wtf is wrong with Argentina but ~I~ don't hate you at all :3. Fame is always going to attract some very vocal haters, you just have to accept that fact and deal with it. They are just jealous of your legendary status as a mapper.Blue Dragon wrote:
Also, stop blaming me for whatever happened in the ranking/approving process of this map. I wasn't ANY involved with it, the only thing I did was submit the old map, struggle for it to get approved and fail (because there were 'easier maps waiting for it'), then ztrot asked me to resubmit the map and then he got it ranked on his own.
If you really want to put the blame in someone when you don't even know the story behind it, you are stupid.
Yes, this goes to some certain people in a certain country, who seem to hate me for no reason at all.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa.Kurisuchianu wrote:
Wait a second, why is in the tag "Taiko"?
ok
Because there is a taiko diff on the mapset, so you can find it by searching "taiko"Kurisuchianu wrote:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa.Kurisuchianu wrote:
Wait a second, why is in the tag "Taiko"?
ok
Mercurial wrote:
But the diff has the "Taiko" name itself.
In this case, is totally unnecessary.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
[Luanny PhNyx] wrote:
Mercurial wrote:
But the diff has the "Taiko" name itself.
In this case, is totally unnecessary.
Correct me if I'm wrong.SPOILERLet's use BD as example.
Approved beatmaps like TU4AR and Banned Forever has a 'Nogard' diff but aren't listed there.
Changing search filter to ranked:
No 'Nogard' diff but you can still find it because of the tags
This. Pretty surprised you guys went with 9 after already making Airman 10.Wishy22 wrote:
This map would've been way better with AR 10, just like Airman =_=.
This kind of maps can only be correctly (somewhat) played by VERY good players, if you are not used to AR 10, then you probably can't play this at all, and when you get used to AR 10 this kind of maps are way better to play with max AR. I am not a high AR master, I like AR 9 overall, but this kind of maps just look and play better with AR 10.Philippines wrote:
If the mapper sticks to AR9, please don't force them to fix it. It doesn't mean that you guys want AR10, doesn't mean he should follow.
Making it AR9 gives more challenge to players and also making it more playable for not-so-pro players.
The rule says "never".Blue Dragon wrote:
That rule does not include HardRock-changed maps, so that'd be a stupid/unnecessary reason for the unrank. But if the childish haters would like it unranked so badly, oh well
Okay, so go ahead and unrank it then if you find it such an unplayable issue.[Dellirium] wrote:
The rule says "never".Blue Dragon wrote:
That rule does not include HardRock-changed maps, so that'd be a stupid/unnecessary reason for the unrank. But if the childish haters would like it unranked so badly, oh well
The thing is that I'm tired of people wanting to find stupid reasons to unrank it just because they don't like the map (or the mapper, like Mercurial's case). It's even more offending than my answers, and it's also a terrible attitude.xsrsbsns wrote:
I might not completely agree with any form of unranks but some of the arrogance being displayed here is just disgusting