updated diff http://puu.sh/13VDSthose wrote:
[Taiko]
- HP Drain probably should not be 6. I like HP4 for maps of this intensity over 3 minutes. Hp4 is WAY too easy. I think you are forgetting this is approval. And you can get in passing range halfway through the song even with misses, and if you lose that towards the end when it gets hard that might be an issue with your playing. I seem to get through this fine missing on purpose. (Not hitting finishers too)
- My biggest concern about the Taiko diff is that the slow parts don't have a very well defined rhythm. That is:
- 00:43:185 (362) - to 00:56:276 (368) - it essentially becomes a "watch the circle" game instead of trying to follow the rhythm. Personally I feel it's pointless to have 8 circles 8/1 apart, so I would just remove this section. I'm just getting rid of this, pointless to have it here anyways.
- 01:55:731 (168) - to 02:07:731 (190) - feels pretty awkward too. During testing I never have a set offset difference, at times I'd get 20ms early and others I'd be late.I think that's just your accuracy. I get under 10ms average on this section. I also don't understand how it can feel awkward when it follows the vocals exactly, explain please.
- If you completely remove these two sections you will have 30 seconds less of a map. If you don't feel it's a good solution, let's try to come up with something else here.
- 01:10:458 (420,421,422,423,424) - Unless you were against using 1/3 for a reason, 1/3 follows this much more closely. This was 1/3 but got messed up when ztrot resnapped things. Fixed it up.
forum
Renard - Rainbow Dash Likes Girls (Stay Gay Pony Girl) [Appr
posted
Total Posts
124
Topic Starter
updated.
Who's not convinced?
Second bubble, you're getting closer.
wow, that was fast. go go go ztrot 
These are suggestions..
[Holy Shiet!]
• As said in-game chat, 00:10:390 - this timing section sounds really loud. I can understand that the other timing volumes are at 100% but with the Soft set.
This is what the timings are at.
I am suggesting two things to you,
• 01:37:731 (1) - to 01:44:549 (12) - . As you can hear, there's alot of finishes which it can be really annoying. But this is not the problem.
This 01:44:549 (12) - to this 01:46:458, there's no finishes. It feels empty to have no finish since you added alot previously. To Keep the consistency, you should add finishes to:
• 02:50:822 (6) - You could add a finish here to keep the consistency with 02:49:731 (12) - and 02:51:913 (15) - .
• 03:08:685 - You may also add a finish here because of the song you tried to reproduce with finishes.
kgo, Approve this map.
[Holy Shiet!]
• As said in-game chat, 00:10:390 - this timing section sounds really loud. I can understand that the other timing volumes are at 100% but with the Soft set.
This is what the timings are at.
I am suggesting two things to you,
- Decrease the volume of 00:10:390 - at 80%
- *Change the set to Soft like the others.
• 01:37:731 (1) - to 01:44:549 (12) - . As you can hear, there's alot of finishes which it can be really annoying. But this is not the problem.
This 01:44:549 (12) - to this 01:46:458, there's no finishes. It feels empty to have no finish since you added alot previously. To Keep the consistency, you should add finishes to:
- 01:44:822 (1) -
- 01:45:367 (5) -
- 01:45:640 (8) -
- 01:45:913 (1) -
- *Delete these finishes. (02:30:095 to 02:34:458)
- Add more finishes after this point.
• 02:50:822 (6) - You could add a finish here to keep the consistency with 02:49:731 (12) - and 02:51:913 (15) - .
• 03:08:685 - You may also add a finish here because of the song you tried to reproduce with finishes.
kgo, Approve this map.
Topic Starter
I really don't mind the hitsounds the way they are now sorry but I would like to keep it as is .Gabe wrote:
These are suggestions..
[Holy Shiet!]
• As said in-game chat, 00:10:390 - this timing section sounds really loud. I can understand that the other timing volumes are at 100% but with the Soft set. the reason the 1st set was at sixty was to make sure the jump from to normal was cushioned as the song went on it was deemed not needed to change the samples during normal to soft hits I kept the 1st one because it didn't hurt anything.
This is what the timings are at.
I am suggesting two things to you,*If you actually do this one, the other timing set can be deleted.
- Decrease the volume of 00:10:390 - at 80%
- *Change the set to Soft like the others.
• 01:37:731 (1) - to 01:44:549 (12) - . As you can hear, there's alot of finishes with it can be really annoying. But this is not the problem.
This 01:44:549 (12) - to this 01:46:458, there's no finishes. It feels empty to have no finish since you added alot previously. To Keep the consistency, you should add finishes to: the music changed for the finish pattern i was using it so I layed off them as not to spam the sound as much• 02:34:458 - same as I said for the point above. You add finishes to 02:30:095 to 02:34:458 and it suddently stops. Again here, I am suggesting you two things. it stops because the pattern changes and the music it is following does as well
- 01:44:822 (1) -
- 01:45:367 (5) -
- 01:45:640 (8) -
- 01:45:913 (1) -
*If I was you, I would have delete these finishes since you only have them for 4 seconds.
- *Delete these finishes. (02:30:095 to 02:34:458)
- Add more finishes after this point.
• 02:50:822 (6) - You could add a finish here to keep the consistency with 02:49:731 (12) - and 02:51:913 (15) - .
• 03:08:685 - You may also add a finish here because of the song you tried to reproduce with finishes.
kgo, Approve this map.
WHAT THE OH MY FUCKING GOD
OH GOD MAN OH MAN OH GOD OH MAN OH GOD MAN
OH GOD MAN OH MAN OH GOD OH MAN OH GOD MAN
Topic Starter
lol the fuck I went to check it and a few secs later approved did not see this one coming o.O thanks everyone.
holy fuck gz
oh god
really it's approved!?
god
god
gz \o
awesome taiko, MMzz <3
awesome taiko, MMzz <3
wow holy shit, it got ranked, and also holy shit, this is so much easier than before
Oh wow, congratz u guys 
Failed wrote:
Holy shit!! It's Approved!!
congrats
yesMaddy wrote:
Just no.
Maddy wrote:
Just no.
o.o/*
kgo, killing myself with these jumps.
HOLY BUTTS
AH. spring is here.
Wait a second, why is in the tag "Taiko"?
ok
ok
Ranking Criteria:
Hitobjects must never be off-screen. All mapsets are played from a fixed-screen viewpoint, so any hitobjects that are even partially off-screen can make it very difficult to read the pattern they are following. Test play your map to confirm this.
inb4 unrank
Mercurial
Go unrank.
This needs to be fixed ASAP.
This needs to be fixed ASAP.
Holy shit its Airman related...!!
Blue Dragon wrote:
WHAT THE OH MY FUCKING GOD
OH GOD MAN OH MAN OH GOD OH MAN OH GOD MAN
That rule does not include HardRock-changed maps, so that'd be a stupid/unnecessary reason for the unrank. But if the childish haters would like it unranked so badly, oh well 
I agree (as in "I agree that mods shouldn't change how a map has to be modded/fixed"), but I still find it funny that some people made rules about stuff that basically can't be played easily on Hidden but plays fine normally.Blue Dragon wrote:
That rule does not include HardRock-changed maps, so that'd be a stupid/unnecessary reason for the unrank. But if the childish haters would like it unranked so badly, oh well
Also, stop blaming me for whatever happened in the ranking/approving process of this map. I wasn't ANY involved with it, the only thing I did was submit the old map, struggle for it to get approved and fail (because there were 'easier maps waiting for it'), then ztrot asked me to resubmit the map and then he got it ranked on his own.
If you really want to put the blame in someone when you don't even know the story behind it, you are stupid.
Yes, this goes to some certain people in a certain country, who seem to hate me for no reason at all.
If you really want to put the blame in someone when you don't even know the story behind it, you are stupid.
Yes, this goes to some certain people in a certain country, who seem to hate me for no reason at all.
Well idk wtf is wrong with Argentina but ~I~ don't hate you at all :3. Fame is always going to attract some very vocal haters, you just have to accept that fact and deal with it. They are just jealous of your legendary status as a mapper.Blue Dragon wrote:
Also, stop blaming me for whatever happened in the ranking/approving process of this map. I wasn't ANY involved with it, the only thing I did was submit the old map, struggle for it to get approved and fail (because there were 'easier maps waiting for it'), then ztrot asked me to resubmit the map and then he got it ranked on his own.
If you really want to put the blame in someone when you don't even know the story behind it, you are stupid.
Yes, this goes to some certain people in a certain country, who seem to hate me for no reason at all.
Topic Starter
Give me some hate guys leave blue_dragon alone! :U Really I'm the one that got the map approved.
I can't hate you ztrot :3
Gratz
Gratz
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa.Kurisuchianu wrote:
Wait a second, why is in the tag "Taiko"?
ok
Because there is a taiko diff on the mapset, so you can find it by searching "taiko"Kurisuchianu wrote:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa.Kurisuchianu wrote:
Wait a second, why is in the tag "Taiko"?
ok
For example, this map has a taiko diff, is approved too but you can't find it searching for taiko because no taiko in tags
Mercurial
why you guys are so mean
Mercurial
Mercurial wrote:
But the diff has the "Taiko" name itself.
In this case, is totally unnecessary.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
SPOILER
Let's use BD as example.
Approved beatmaps like TU4AR and Banned Forever has a 'Nogard' diff but aren't listed there.
Changing search filter to ranked:
No 'Nogard' diff but you can still find it because of the tags
Approved beatmaps like TU4AR and Banned Forever has a 'Nogard' diff but aren't listed there.
Changing search filter to ranked:
No 'Nogard' diff but you can still find it because of the tags
Please don't unrank this because of an unnoticeable thing to the eyes of the "normal" people, thank you.
btw, congrats BD! i hate you ztrot, go die.
btw, congrats BD! i hate you ztrot, go die.
Tags issue isn't unrankable, so even if this kid tries, he won't make the map unranked. He can try to make whatever he wants, the map was checked by 3 team members so it just won't be unranked.
Deal with it.
And thanks for whoever likes the map.
Deal with it.
And thanks for whoever likes the map.
Mercurial
[Luanny PhNyx] wrote:
Mercurial wrote:
But the diff has the "Taiko" name itself.
In this case, is totally unnecessary.
Correct me if I'm wrong.SPOILERLet's use BD as example.
Approved beatmaps like TU4AR and Banned Forever has a 'Nogard' diff but aren't listed there.
Changing search filter to ranked:
No 'Nogard' diff but you can still find it because of the tags
Oh, thanks for clarify me this.
btw, the diff name could be searched ingame.
Just saying.
Topic Starter
as silly as the tag sounds i questioned it too made no sense but i figured just like with guest names on beat maps it should be consistent also it is a tag not reason to unrank over something so minor it isn't really a map error now is it.
Very very hard...
This map is horrible because AR 9.
You don't read that kind of notes isn't?
This map would've been way better with AR 10, just like Airman =_=.
Wow. A lot of my favorite parts were removed from this map. What the hell.
This. Pretty surprised you guys went with 9 after already making Airman 10.Wishy22 wrote:
This map would've been way better with AR 10, just like Airman =_=.
Go unrank, fix the broken slider and go AR 10!
If the mapper sticks to AR9, please don't force them to fix it. It doesn't mean that you guys want AR10, doesn't mean he should follow.
Making it AR9 gives more challenge to players and also making it more playable for not-so-pro players.
Making it AR9 gives more challenge to players and also making it more playable for not-so-pro players.
As an AR 9 player, I find this map WAY easier to play on AR 10.Philippines wrote:
Making it AR9 gives more challenge to players and also making it more playable for not-so-pro players.
Well, that's probably your taste then. I find AR9 fine and intuitive.
This kind of maps can only be correctly (somewhat) played by VERY good players, if you are not used to AR 10, then you probably can't play this at all, and when you get used to AR 10 this kind of maps are way better to play with max AR. I am not a high AR master, I like AR 9 overall, but this kind of maps just look and play better with AR 10.Philippines wrote:
If the mapper sticks to AR9, please don't force them to fix it. It doesn't mean that you guys want AR10, doesn't mean he should follow.
Making it AR9 gives more challenge to players and also making it more playable for not-so-pro players.
Just use HardRock if you think that you have Problems with AR9.
And so what if circles getting smaller and the HP getting harder, deal with it that the AR is at 9.
And so what if circles getting smaller and the HP getting harder, deal with it that the AR is at 9.
I wanted to use AR10 but ztrot found it better as AR9, saying that if you want AR10 you can just put HR on. I personally don't agree much, but he's the mapper now ;p
The rule says "never".Blue Dragon wrote:
That rule does not include HardRock-changed maps, so that'd be a stupid/unnecessary reason for the unrank. But if the childish haters would like it unranked so badly, oh well
Okay, so go ahead and unrank it then if you find it such an unplayable issue.[Dellirium] wrote:
The rule says "never".Blue Dragon wrote:
That rule does not include HardRock-changed maps, so that'd be a stupid/unnecessary reason for the unrank. But if the childish haters would like it unranked so badly, oh well
Oh wait, you can't.
I might not completely agree with any form of unranks but some of the arrogance being displayed here is just disgusting
The thing is that I'm tired of people wanting to find stupid reasons to unrank it just because they don't like the map (or the mapper, like Mercurial's case). It's even more offending than my answers, and it's also a terrible attitude.xsrsbsns wrote:
I might not completely agree with any form of unranks but some of the arrogance being displayed here is just disgusting
Mercurial
the given "unrank" reasons are stupid if you look at them.
btw, don't like it, don't play it. There are many other maps to pick.
btw, don't like it, don't play it. There are many other maps to pick.
look guys. there is nothing wrong with the slider. its perfectly playable. if you have a have problem with it, then too bad. this isn't even worth a unrank. if the whole path was off-screen, then yes, that would be enough for a unrank. but its all on screen and totally re-able. stop bitching about the tiniest little detail
That's not a reason for an unrank and for a childish attitude.Mercurial wrote:
I don't like the mapping displayed here, is such like a DJPop TAG map, that's disgusting in many ways.
Even better, if you want to pick out every single little thing that could be possibly discussed in maps, here's a link that I'm sure will be of use
Mercurial
Don't put words in my mouth, I never said that must be unranked.Blue Dragon wrote:
That's not a reason for an unrank and for a childish attitude.Mercurial wrote:
I don't like the mapping displayed here, is such like a DJPop TAG map, that's disgusting in many ways.
But please, the next time try to do some better mapping than this shit.
I love you Mercurial <3
The person who unranks this will die a horrible death.
Haters gonna die. <3
Haters gonna die. <3
Mercurial
Just talking with kids in a language they can understand.Mercurial wrote:
Childish attitude? Where?
requesting a lock. this is going no where.
Seph
Okay, I'm locking this.