forum

Kurousa-P - Spiral labyrinth [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
64
show more
Loctav
[General]

a reminder: You wanted to add 'taiko' to the tags :P

[Kantan]

seems fine~

[aabc's Futsuu]

00:41:670 (1) - the notepitch isnt high enough to justify the kat here. Do a don.
00:46:470 (1) - has the same voice height and drum as 00:44:870 (1) - . do a kat.

[Taiko Muzukashii]

00:47:870 (1) - this follows the same as 00:46:270 (2) - . Do a kat.

[aabc's Taiko]

01:19:070 - this spot was troublesome for me. The kkkdd didn't fit. this seemed to be the best solution for me instead: http://puu.sh/11rBz

[Taiko Oni]

00:28:870 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - this made no sense to me. Do a full donstream instead or do don triplets. You left out the stressed upbeats (white ticks) and 00:29:970 (9) - is offplaced. If you remove the pattern, you can hear a stress on every white tick. If you don't want to do a full donstream (which I suggest due to Oni'ness), try to stress those ones instead of those syncopic stuff, which isnt in the music self. :[

[Taiko Inner Oni]

seems fine~

[Taiko Ura Oni]

00:30:470 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - this should have the same pattern as in the Inner Oni. Seriously. :S

Call me back when fixed.
Mithos
I'm downloading this because it's taiko and it's a great song. If I have any problems with it I'll 'mod' it for you.

no problems to report. Great song.
grumd

Loctav wrote:

The diff naming is pretty inconsistent and weird.
I suggest this (since symbols are already shown in the game client):

Kantan
aabc's Futsuu
Muzukashii
Oni
aabc's Oni
Inner Oni
Ura Oni
I agree with this. Ono, please, just rename them, the way Loctav is suggesting it looks much better.
Check how people name their taiko-only mapsets:
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/57381
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/55920
Topic Starter
OnosakiHito

Mithost wrote:

I'm downloading this because it's taiko and it's a great song. If I have any problems with it I'll 'mod' it for you.

no problems to report. Great song.
Great to hear that thank you!

@grumd: I understand. Thought also about it many times. Will ask aabc as well.

@Loctav: ,,taiko" has been addeted in tag and one mod. I will look later thorugh the ther suggestions. Waiting for aabc for now~
Loctav
Don't forget to list up in detail what you accepted and with exact reasoning if you have refused something.
Else it's harder for me to backtrack the changes you two have made.
aabc271
My Internet connection is having some issues atm
So I can't connect to the Internet in pc and check the mod right now
Will probably be back and fix the diff tmr. Sry ;w;
Topic Starter
OnosakiHito

Loctav wrote:

[General]

a reminder: You wanted to add 'taiko' to the tags :P :arrow: added


[Taiko Muzukashii]

00:47:870 (1) - this follows the same as 00:46:270 (2) - . Do a kat. :arrow: done

[Taiko Oni]

00:28:870 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - this made no sense to me. Do a full donstream instead or do don triplets. You left out the stressed upbeats (white ticks) and 00:29:970 (9) - is offplaced. If you remove the pattern, you can hear a stress on every white tick. If you don't want to do a full donstream (which I suggest due to Oni'ness), try to stress those ones instead of those syncopic stuff, which isnt in the music self. :[ :arrow: To be honest I want to keep them. It was intension from me to put own beats and I feel really confortabel and well with them.

[Taiko Ura Oni]

00:30:470 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - this should have the same pattern as in the Inner Oni. Seriously. :S :arrow: done

Call me back when fixed.
Also I have deleted the ,,taiko" in the diff names!
aabc271

Loctav wrote:

[aabc's Futsuu]

00:41:670 (1) - the notepitch isnt high enough to justify the kat here. Do a don. As the previous note is also d, using d here is kind of monotone, and imo k fits the vocal better
00:46:470 (1) - has the same voice height and drum as 00:44:870 (1) - . do a kat. I use d here because it has a significantly lower pitch than 00:48:070. For me, the current patterns are just fine and so I think it's OK to keep unchanged

[aabc's Taiko]

01:19:070 - this spot was troublesome for me. The kkkdd didn't fit. this seemed to be the best solution for me instead: http://puu.sh/11rBz Talked irc and I agreed to change kkkdd to kkd d

Call me back when fixed.
Thx for your mod :)
Talked irc and I agreed to rename "aabc's Taiko" to "aabc's Oni"
Update : aabc's Oni
Topic Starter
OnosakiHito
Thank you aabc~
renamed aabc's Taiko to aabc's Oni

and changed in the oni the 00:28:870 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - to kkkk kk kkkk kk after talking to Loctav in IRC.

Are we sure that everything is allright now?
Loctav
There we go~
Topic Starter
OnosakiHito
Thank you really much Loctav~
Aurele

Loctav wrote:

There we go~
Your first rank? :>

Congratulation \o/
Cygnus
wow

EDIT: shouldn't the source be Vocaloid 2?
Mercurial
Nice Ono.
Beige
taiko mapset!!! Congratz~
Loctav
Let's fix the source/tag thing.
Aurele
I just laughed.
Go for re-rank c:
Topic Starter
OnosakiHito
Fixed them, sorry. Was my fault.
Cygnus
I guess you should also add vocaloid2 in tags?
Loctav

Philippines wrote:

I guess you should also add vocaloid2 in tags?
I think "vocaloid" is enough. :S

Well. Okay.
Changed following things.
Artist -> Kurousa-P
Tags -> added "vocaloid" and "hatsune miku"
Source -> wiped out.

Reranked.
Stefan
Nice nice nice nice!
Topic Starter
OnosakiHito
Thank you. lol
Loctav
I just gifted my birthday present to you.
Oh yes.

You've unlocked a new achievement


lol.
[Luanny]
Congrats! \o
Stefan
Oh, and congrats to Loctav's first obligatory Rank!
[Luanny]
first rank and first unrank lol
Suimya

Loctav wrote:

You've unlocked a new achievement


lol.
lol yes .... and gratz for both of you =w=/
No_Gu
I wonder why the artist isn't Hatsune Miku and the source isn't Kurousa-P.
anyway,congratz
inaba-tan
onosakiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii おめでと!!!
Cygnus

No_Gu wrote:

I wonder why the artist isn't Hatsune Miku and the source isn't Kurousa-P.
Loctav

No_Gu wrote:

I wonder why the artist isn't Hatsune Miku and the source isn't Kurousa-P.
anyway,congratz
p/1767683
Please sign in to reply.

New reply