dkun wrote:

popner wrote:

thus only applies if more than 20% of the outro is unmapped.

So what if two rules conflict?

rule of thumb

50% of an mp3 not being used is blatantly stupid
have some common sense

did you even look at the ranking date? I don't see the MAT/BAT ranking this asking if it was in question?

Lybydose wrote:

There's no reason this should have been unranked. Unmapped portion requirements don't apply to the intro, and this file isn't even large to begin with. It's a stretch to even call the intro "mappable" due to the lack of a steady beat to follow.

Instead, you're just coming up with completely arbitrary and irrelevant reasons to unrank something just because you disagree with who the mapper is and/or don't want it ranked in a short period of time, neither of which have anything to do with map quality or "rankability".

Darksonic wrote:

and if people don't want to listen it, there is a "Skip" button..

Mercurial wrote:

Atte: A mapper that took 11 months to get his map ranked.

Stefan wrote:

Mercurial wrote:

Atte: A mapper that took 11 months to get his map ranked.

So, this is bad?

Snowy Dream wrote:

Re-congratz > <

cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:

TARI TARI!!!!

Philippines wrote:

One thing I should suggest: Never listen to other people's opinion.

those wrote:

So if I understand correctly, another forty-five seconds was mapped and it received... how many mods?

Deif wrote:

Philippines wrote:

One thing I should suggest: Never listen to other people's opinion.

Worst advice ever. If you don't hear what other people suggest, the whole ranking system (playtest - feedback info to the mapper) wouldn't make any sense. In fact, it's useful to improve ourselves and the quality of our maps.

Regardless my opinion, congratulations Andrea!

Philippines wrote:

I might have just said it wrong, sorry. What I mean is, if you know that you're going the right way, why bother listening on others?

Tanzklaue wrote:

because the things you have done probably could be done better, and what other people suggest could be better than what you had originally done.

The mapset must have a well-designed spread of difficulties, containing at least an Easy or a Normal difficulty (based on how the map feels): this is so that players of all levels of experience are able to enjoy maps of the songs they love. It's really hard to define how a specific spread could work in a specific song beforehand, but here's a list of things to consider: the difficulties in the mapset must be in a consecutive order and/or with a reasonable gap between them; there should be at least one difficulty around ~2.5/3 star difficulty level; if your mapset has two difficulties, one of them cannot be insane (this basically means that it's highly recommended to have 3 difficulties unless the song itself doesn't allow much variety); if your mapset has three difficulties, one of them should be about ~2.5/3 star difficulty level, and the second should not be Insane; if your map has four or more difficulties, at least two should be something other than Insane.

Andrea wrote:

what's the point of your post? o.o

h3k1ru wrote:

this game became full of haters