Seriously.. I don't know if I want to cry or laugh.
forum
Seto Asami & Hayami Saori - Kokoro no Senritsu (TV Size)
posted
Total Posts
134
The start of the song (00:00:069 ~ 01:00:750) is mappable. Half of the song is unnecessarily skipped imo :l
TARI TARI!!!!
Congratz~
uh, isn't this unrankable if it's not mapped?Kei wrote:
The start of the song (00:00:069 ~ 01:00:750) is mappable. Half of the song is unnecessarily skipped imo :l
Omg everyone is conspiring against Andrea maps 
Yes it is, unranking, mapper needs to finish mapping the first halfdkun wrote:
uh, isn't this unrankable if it's not mapped?Kei wrote:
The start of the song (00:00:069 ~ 01:00:750) is mappable. Half of the song is unnecessarily skipped imo :l
The rule states 20% of the mp3 (not cumulative), so 15% intro and 15% outro unmapped is allowed, but 21% intro alone unmapped isn't.dkun wrote:
uh, isn't this unrankable if it's not mapped?Kei wrote:
The start of the song (00:00:069 ~ 01:00:750) is mappable. Half of the song is unnecessarily skipped imo :l
Oh my. Andrea is so lazy. o.o
I love it how such a mistake was made by a BAT.
People never learn
GladiOol wrote:
I love it how such a mistake was made by a BAT.
Natteke wrote:
People never learn
wow, we had quite a few slaps from andrea about what he got ranked. but, really, a not even finished, half-assed map?
bt we shouldn't bash andrea to much, though he is really a lazy something, but much rather the MAT (Kenezz) and BAT (Mafiamaster) giving this their seal of approval, in form of a bubble and a rank. something like this is not a "little slip", not overlooking an overlapped repeatarrow or something, no, this was ranking a simply not finished map and I don't know, but I don't think that anybody else would have got this ranked.
this is a punch into the face of everybody who actually cares about his map, everybody who desperately tries to get MATs and BATs to mod his or her map, and to every MAT/BAT who actually tries to do his or her job properly.
bt we shouldn't bash andrea to much, though he is really a lazy something, but much rather the MAT (Kenezz) and BAT (Mafiamaster) giving this their seal of approval, in form of a bubble and a rank. something like this is not a "little slip", not overlooking an overlapped repeatarrow or something, no, this was ranking a simply not finished map and I don't know, but I don't think that anybody else would have got this ranked.
this is a punch into the face of everybody who actually cares about his map, everybody who desperately tries to get MATs and BATs to mod his or her map, and to every MAT/BAT who actually tries to do his or her job properly.
Everyone deserves a slap
Wow. Just wow. Another unranked speedrank o.o well... mapping 2 diffs with half of the mp3 not being mapped and pure copypasta... I don't know what to say honestly.
Also...
Also...
Pretty much what it is, indeed.Tanzklaue wrote:
this is a punch into the face of everybody who actually cares about his map, everybody who desperately tries to get MATs and BATs to mod his or her map, and to every MAT/BAT who actually tries to do his or her job properly.
your avatar is perfect for that postSeph wrote:
yay another quality map ran-
oh.
Also... I completely agree with the previous posts.
Also, a question to andrea:
Why do you have to ignore the people who say this? Why do you just keep doing what you are doing? Don't you think it's unfair?
But please don't troll. Give constructive criticism instead of trolling, thanks. Any trolling posts will be deleted.
Another question to Andrea:Blue Dragon wrote:
your avatar is perfect for that postSeph wrote:
yay another quality map ran-
oh.
Also... I completely agree with the previous posts.
Also, a question to andrea:
Why do you have to ignore the people who say this? Why do you just keep doing what you are doing? Don't you think it's unfair?
But please don't troll. Give constructive criticism instead of trolling, thanks. Any trolling posts will be deleted.
Are you choosing to be oblivious on purpose or are you just that oblivious?
t/92895
Rules wrote:
You must cut your mp3 if you're using less than 80% of it. This doesn't count intro time, and thus only applies if more than 20% of the outro is unmapped. If you only plan to map a portion of your song, then including the full mp3 is a waste of file space. Many mp3 editing tools like this exist which make fading and cutting a song simple. However, if you have a legitimate reason for keeping your full mp3 (e.g. a storyboard after the map ends), then that is fine.
There isn't any unrankable thing.
50% of the mp3 is not an intro :3popner wrote:
Rules wrote:
You must cut your mp3 if you're using less than 80% of it. This doesn't count intro time, and thus only applies if more than 20% of the outro is unmapped. If you only plan to map a portion of your song, then including the full mp3 is a waste of file space. Many mp3 editing tools like this exist which make fading and cutting a song simple. However, if you have a legitimate reason for keeping your full mp3 (e.g. a storyboard after the map ends), then that is fine.
Also, 50% of the MP3 is a big problem.popner wrote:
If you only plan to map a portion of your song, then including the full mp3 is a waste of file space.
popner wrote:
Rules wrote:
You must cut your mp3 if you're using less than 80% of it. This doesn't count intro time, and thus only applies if more than 20% of the outro is unmapped. If you only plan to map a portion of your song, then including the full mp3 is a waste of file space. Many mp3 editing tools like this exist which make fading and cutting a song simple. However, if you have a legitimate reason for keeping your full mp3 (e.g. a storyboard after the map ends), then that is fine.
can't tell if stupidRules wrote:
You must cut your mp3 if you're using less than 80% of it. This doesn't count intro time, and thus only applies if more than 20% of the outro is unmapped. If you only plan to map a portion of your song, then including the full mp3 is a waste of file space. Many mp3 editing tools like this exist which make fading and cutting a song simple. However, if you have a legitimate reason for keeping your full mp3 (e.g. a storyboard after the map ends), then that is fine.
And that 50% is completely mappable in this case.Tanzklaue wrote:
50% of the mp3 is not an intro :3
thus only applies if more than 20% of the outro is unmapped.
So what if two rules conflict?
So what if two rules conflict?
Then a mapper, when in doubt, should check what's right and what's wrong instead of outright ranking his map in 9 days without even checking the rules.popner wrote:
thus only applies if more than 20% of the outro is unmapped.
So what if two rules conflict?
rule of thumbpopner wrote:
thus only applies if more than 20% of the outro is unmapped.
So what if two rules conflict?
50% of an mp3 not being used is blatantly stupid
have some common sense
did you even look at the ranking date? I don't see the MAT/BAT ranking this asking if it was in question?
common sense seems to be an big issue with the staff involved in ranking generally. helping people who don't need the help (or shouldn't need itdkun wrote:
rule of thumbpopner wrote:
thus only applies if more than 20% of the outro is unmapped.
So what if two rules conflict?
50% of an mp3 not being used is blatantly stupid
have some common sense
did you even look at the ranking date? I don't see the MAT/BAT ranking this asking if it was in question?
), but leaving otu the people who desperately search for help because they are too busy (modding maps that don't need their help as much) is not that logical either.Locking until I can talk with the people involved, this is going nowhere and not helping,
I understand people have legitimate reasons and worries, and lots have valid points, but turning it into an argument will not help anyone.
I will talk to the people involved then unlock, once the new parts are mapped please help mod this to a good standard so that we can get this reranked and the scores back for the players who have lost score.
Thank you
I understand people have legitimate reasons and worries, and lots have valid points, but turning it into an argument will not help anyone.
I will talk to the people involved then unlock, once the new parts are mapped please help mod this to a good standard so that we can get this reranked and the scores back for the players who have lost score.
Thank you
Topic Starter
Finished and moved back to Pending Beatmaps.
I'm sorry for the trouble to everyone.
I'm sorry for the trouble to everyone.
You forgot to unlock the thread, so i did that for you
There's no reason this should have been unranked. Unmapped portion requirements don't apply to the intro, and this file isn't even large to begin with. It's a stretch to even call the intro "mappable" due to the lack of a steady beat to follow.
Instead, you're just coming up with completely arbitrary and irrelevant reasons to unrank something just because you disagree with who the mapper is and/or don't want it ranked in a short period of time, neither of which have anything to do with map quality or "rankability".
Instead, you're just coming up with completely arbitrary and irrelevant reasons to unrank something just because you disagree with who the mapper is and/or don't want it ranked in a short period of time, neither of which have anything to do with map quality or "rankability".
I see nothing wrong with the map as is and personally this convo is far to negative please Andrea take this time to possibly lay off getting your maps looked into so fast you might find it will do a world of good for you.
We're complaining about how a mapper gets a half-assed map ranked in 9 days -not just the unrank thing-, being so lazy that he can't even map the whole song, and only maps 2 diffs with pure copypaste and gets 2 XATs in the blink of an eye; while other people have to struggle hard to get their maps ranked for months and months, and they put 10x the effort Andrea made in this map. Also, the intro is completely mappeable, it matches with the bpm perfectly.Lybydose wrote:
There's no reason this should have been unranked. Unmapped portion requirements don't apply to the intro, and this file isn't even large to begin with. It's a stretch to even call the intro "mappable" due to the lack of a steady beat to follow.
Instead, you're just coming up with completely arbitrary and irrelevant reasons to unrank something just because you disagree with who the mapper is and/or don't want it ranked in a short period of time, neither of which have anything to do with map quality or "rankability".
This is just..... stupid.
Personally I think the mapper can choose to map or not the first part due this is not a big problem and maybe it's not really good to map like the rest of the song, and if people don't want to listen it, there is a "Skip" button..
BUT YEY RULES
Personally I think the mapper can choose to map or not the first part due this is not a big problem and maybe it's not really good to map like the rest of the song, and if people don't want to listen it, there is a "Skip" button..
BUT YEY RULES
Topic Starter
Snepif if you don't know anything, just don't post, thanks.
There isn't any copy-paste at all in the map, also, I put lots of effort when I make my maps, so yeah.
You can already leave the topic.
There isn't any copy-paste at all in the map, also, I put lots of effort when I make my maps, so yeah.
You can already leave the topic.
Mercurial