Updated :3
Thanks for modding !kanpakyin wrote:
[Gezo's Taiko Oni].
- 85% sounds too loud for me. I personally prefer normal 65% volume. It should be enough. It was 80% not 85. Well, go for 65.
- 00:06:554 (1) - I found that a kat fit the music very well here. Consider it? Okay
- 00:31:099 (1,1,2,1) - This 2-plets pattern didn't fit the music that well, I would prefer simple 1/2 or triplet here. I doubt any 2plet pattern would fit the music here. Changed the "diplet" to a triplet.
- 00:32:008 (1,2,3,1,1) - ddkkd? I prefer dddkd, ddkkd sounds weird to my eyes for some reason.o_o
- 01:29:963 (2) - 01:30:872 (4) - 01:31:781 (2) - change it to kat? I totally agree !
Thx for mod~kanpakyin wrote:
[cRyo's Hard]
- Beatmap design/suggestion
(These are totally suggestion only,you can ignore them if you disagree.)
- 00:13:145 (1) - How about moving this up a bit then it can align to (5.6)- and it will be more beautiful imo. changed a bit~
- 00:22:463 (1) - Same as Easy if its about silent spinner end so i think its better then leave soft hit there (or anything else)
- 01:07:690 (1,2,3,4) - I think a jump here would be much better because you had placed a jump at 01:05:872 (1,2,3,4,5) - so I was expecting some jump here with same melody. didnt want to place jumps every where, will add 1 here
- 01:09:508 (1,2,3,4,5) - ^Same. this one fits better without jump for me
- Hitsound
(These are totally my thought only,it base on my taste,feel free to ignore them)
- 00:07:008 (1) - Probably add a whistle at here to increase the striking feeling of playing? dont like this whistle
wmfchris wrote:
- I guess "_Gezo_" is usually tagged instead of "Gezo" (you can try in searching)
p/1654297iMercurial wrote:
General
- Maybe some people will search your name as "Gezo", so you could add it to tags. - Not necessary at all. :http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/363523
[Colours]
Combo1 : 169,254,194
Combo2 : 255,183,255
Combo3 : 255,219,145
lepidopodus wrote:
[Gezo's Taiko Oni]
- Generally good. Just some suggestions.
- Chorus part has kiai effect and kiai effect can make that part special, but next time, try making more difference between chorus parts and non-chorus or inter-chorus parts. For example, in 00:07:690 (1,2,1,1,2,3,1,1,1,2), you could give some 'points' to 00:08:599 (30) and 00:09:054 (1) cause vocal is stressed out.
00:10:418 (1,2,1) - Currently 'k k d', but 'd d k' might be better cause pitch of vocal is going up. Not so necessary though, cause we express these kind of things reversed, too.
00:12:918 (1) - don? Cause 00:13:145 (2) needs to be 'bold' but this note is interfering it by being kat.
00:14:054 (3) - I prefer kat here. Vocal pitch thing, I guess. Adjust nearby notes if you think it is needed.
00:16:554 / 00:18:372 - Personally I prefer leaving 00:18:372 empty and filling here cause you did that in 4 measures ago. /baka, fixed
00:19:281 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - 'kkd d kkd' might be better. I prefer kkd in this measure since pitch of vocal is going down Why not !
00:25:872 (1,2,1,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - Maybe you can repeat rhythm you used in 00:22:236 ~ 00:25:645 (2)? I prefer using that rythm (and that o o x ooo o x xxo o x oxoxo x, lol)
00:27:690 (1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,3) - Similar with above, but I also put slight change on rhythm in 4th measure usually, so whatever.
00:33:145 (1,2,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2) - You used 'o o o oo oo' kind of rhythm in 2 measures ago, so might be better to apply that in here too? Yes !00:53:372 (2,3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - Remember we use some kind of streams likehttp://puu.sh/GAaN
00:58:599 (1), 00:59:281 (2), 01:00:190 (1), 01:01:099 (2), 01:02:008 (1) - I guess you can make these big notes if you want? Corresponding Vocal and backgroud music, I mean. Well if you want to spare those big notes you can leave this as normal, but making these big notes also makes this part stands out since it is the end of inter-chorus part. Now I remember why I cut these streams XD
01:08:600 (1,2,1) - Same with 00:10:418 (1,2,1).
01:11:100 (1) - Same with 00:12:918 (1). fixedddkd
01:12:236 (3) - Same with 00:14:054 (3). ^
01:14:736 / 01:16:554 - Same with 00:16:554 / 00:18:372 ^
01:17:463 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1) - Same with 00:19:281 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1). ^
01:20:418 (1) - Shorten this by 1/2 can give a 'point' to emptiness of 01:21:327. ^
01:22:236 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - Hmm, I think it might be better to give some changes instead of mere 'd d k k d d k k' kind of pattern. (So currently it is d 'ddk k d ddk k', so how about 'd ddk d k ddk d' or something like that? whatever.) ^
01:32:690 (2) - I prefer kat here. fixed in wmf's mod
I said this is suggestions so applying these is up to you. Contact me if you have anything to ask.
cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
Grats with your first ranked Andrea !
cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
Grats with your first ranked Andrea !
even i can't see the preview BGcRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
Grats with your first ranked Andrea !
wow!cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:
Grats with your first ranked Andrea !