Garven wrote:

Yo, sorry I took so long to get to this.

[General]
02:48:942 - This is a weird place to end the kiai. 02:42:942 - End it here if anything.　I leave it to Quilt

[Hard]
02:42:942 (1,1) - I prefer the way R a i n did his spinner transition. Check the easy and see if you like it better.
Otherwise this is pretty nice.Fixed~

Garven wrote:

Yo, sorry I took so long to get to this.

[Taiko]
00:12:379 (3,1,1,1,1) - kddkd ok
00:15:942 (1,1,1,2,1) - These finishes felt rather inappropriate no
00:18:942 (1) - And then you miss a perfect opportunity to add one in. no
00:36:379 (1,2,3) - These feel better as k ok
00:50:254 (2,1,2) - I'm not feeling this rhythm at all considering the music. ok
00:58:692 (3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3) - Why? 01:03:192 (1) - This is the best place for a longer stream, and you already took advantage of that. Why this one? no
02:18:942 (1) - This kiai section feels so empty. This is supposed to be the big finale of the piece. wait


The taiko needs a lot of work still. I asked in #taiko for some volunteers to mod this. I don't know if anyone will come, but it's a start. See if you can get it in a better state, then call me back. :3

spboxer3 wrote:

Random check in #modreqs as your Taiko mod request

Taiko

• 
  Settings
  (For the setting. like Song Setup/timing or break time~)
  

1. none~

mapping
(These are about your pattern.Mostly for the suggest, Just some unrankable issue I will use red color to highlight it.)

1. 00:05:442 - It's a kinda empty here. maybe you need add some object like d? ok
2. 00:09:942 - ^ ok
3. 00:12:379 (3,1,1,1,1) - try to use ddkdk? no
4. 00:13:317 (3,1,2,1) - sound kd dk is better ok
5. 00:19:317 (2,1,2,1) - dk dk/ dk kk? ((because 00:20:067 - it's a high pitch in the background ok
6. 00:25:317 (1,1,1,1,1) - kdd dd follow the background about high/low pitch? change
7. 00:40:317 (2,1,2) - awkward pattern for me. because it's not follow the rhythm to make this pattern. ↓ is a possible solution ok
   
   
8. 00:52:317 (2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - used like xxx x xxx x or xxx x x xxx rhythm is better. ok
9. 00:56:254 (3,1,2) - used like ↓ rhythm it's more flow for this part ok
   
   
   01:03:942 - to 01:06:379 - It's poor difficulty spread. for this part. It's too easy compare to other part. ok
10. 01:09:192 (1,1,2,3,4,1) - ^ ok
11. 01:17:442 - [suggestion] add d? ok
12. 01:40:317 (1,2,3) - sound ddk is better. ok
13. 01:41:067 (1,2,3,4,5,1,1,1) - [suggestion] k d d d d k d k? no
14. 01:44:067 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,1,2,3) - d k k d d k k d d k K ((follow the high/low pitch. ok
15. 01:50:254 (4) - It's sound like a downbeat. so I suggest to use D? ok
16. 01:52:692 (5) - k?　　 ok
17. 01:53:442 (3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - d k d k k d k?　　 ok
18. 01:55:317 (1,2,3) - follow this pitch. k d d is better.　　 ok
19. 01:56:067 (1,2,3,4) - d d k d. same as follow pitch issue.　　 ok
20. 02:03:192 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - try to use k d d k d d k d.　　 ok
21. 02:05:442 (1,2,3,4,5) - [suggestion] kkddd?　　ok
22. 02:09:942 (2,3,1,2) - sound b]k d k k[/b] is better.　　ok
23. 02:12:942 (6,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,3,1) - k d d kdd d d k k d k? ((follow the background about high/low pitch?　ok
24. 02:18:192 (1,2,3,1,1) - d d k k D. ((same as pitch and downbeat issue.　　ok
25. 02:18:942 - to 03:06:942 - D: It's toooooo easy for the second kiai time. you can reference the first kiai time to map. ok
    

　
good luck~

Breeze wrote:

Sorry for late reply, when this map get rebubbled, feel free to ask me for a check then

1. well since the artist has been changed to FELT, edit the title of the thread
2. And I'm not clear about the vocal so make sure Maika is still correct to appear there even after the artist change http://puu.sh/A9qb
3. Spinner New Combo 02:20:442 (2) - Put a new combo on this note so the previous spinner ends properly. (yes you need to add NC manually cause the spinner and the next note seems not in a row (not tightly group together in a logical way))

LKs wrote:

[Lunatic]
00:09:004 (3,4,5,6) - how about http://puu.sh/A9zJ? no chenge

LKs wrote:

hi, as per your req from forum PM

[General]


[Pastel's Hard]

00:24:379 (5,6,7,8) - whistle,0,whistle,0→whistle,whistle,0,0
01:07:504 (3) - http://puu.sh/A9xS
02:21:567 (4) - ctrl+r? better flow imo

Garven wrote:

Rebubbled!

Patchouli wrote:

3...2...1...

1. 02:18:942 - 02:48:942 - Why not keep using 2-4 clap in this part? sometimes you add clap at 1 or 3 white tick, that sounds odd imo

1. 00:18:754 (6) - I think this jump is not a good idea, easily read to 1/2 beat space
2. 02:02:254 (6) - Slider path is a bit hidden by hitburst of previous note, it would be nice if you move this slider to another area
3. 01:18:379 (1) - Slider head, finish here sounds awkward imo, maybe remove finish?
4. 01:24:754 (4) - ^, according to music, finish should at 01:24:942 white tick, but there is no note there, so just keep there empty would be better than it was now
5. 01:26:254 (3) - Slider tail, add finish
6. 02:29:254 (3) - Slider head, add finish

1. 01:02:629 (1) - This spacing is just...odd, well, still playable though, I think it would be nice if it's a usual spacing or just stack it under 01:02:254 (5)

Breeze wrote:

[Normal]

1. 02:18:942 - 02:48:942 - Why not keep using 2-4 clap in this part? sometimes you add clap at 1 or 3 white tick, that sounds odd imo

[Lunatic]

1. 01:02:629 (1) - This spacing is just...odd, well, still playable though, I think it would be nice if it's a usual spacing or just stack it under 01:02:254 (5)

That's all

Breeze wrote:

[Pstel's Hard]

1. 00:18:754 (6) - I think this jump is not a good idea, easily read to 1/2 beat space
2. 02:02:254 (6) - Slider path is a bit hidden by hitburst of previous note, it would be nice if you move this slider to another area
3. 01:18:379 (1) - Slider head, finish here sounds awkward imo, maybe remove finish?
4. 01:24:754 (4) - ^, according to music, finish should at 01:24:942 white tick, but there is no note there, so just keep there empty would be better than it was now
5. 01:26:254 (3) - Slider tail, add finish
6. 02:29:254 (3) - Slider head, add finish

That's all