bump >.> TALK PEOPLE GAH
anyway, I already said my reasons for suspicion on Day 2, so I don't think it needs repeating
anyway, I already said my reasons for suspicion on Day 2, so I don't think it needs repeating
I already told you why I voted for you, but I'll repeat it again. There was nothing to go on besides random votes on some small talk. I picked up what I thought was suspicious (you) and went with it.Wojjan wrote:
'kay Derekku, here are my reasons
1) You're lurking, only repeating what we know and small-talking, not contributing anything but a load of arguments on me .
2) You're trying way too hard to dispatch of me, sort of suspicious as is
All these quotes are just there to make people believe him and lynch me.
So I'd take the innocent attitude you're playing elsewhere.
Court adjourned
What a coincidence, I'll vote kuwarudo too.kuwarudo wrote:
Gar GAr
Vote for myself
:-/
Larto wrote:
"I haven't read a post in the last 5 days."
You aren't even paying attention to the game? What?
Fuckkker kuwarudo, stop the fuck signing up then >.>
I'm voting for you (kuwarudo) just for your stupidity if that's a word
Via WW2Kuu wrote:
My GOD, WTF just happened I was cut-off for 3 days, which means my internet got busted for 3 days, the only reason I could post right now is because I'm in a Wifi Hotspot which means I may not be on again for a few more days. So to make this post count
Larto wrote:
Oh come on, how could I have known that your internet was dead, I don't care about WW2 =.=
How could you Lardo? THOSE MEN DIED FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM but of course you don't care you're a Nazi /lamejokeLarto wrote:
Oh come on, how could I have known that your internet was dead, I don't care about WW2 =.=
You diddn't ask any questions. You just made statements you did already, which is what I call not contributing to the game, and in that way, a form of lurking.Derekku Chan wrote:
Voting: Wojjan because he still hasn't answered my questions
Fiercely? lolYellowYoshi1 wrote:
Voting for Derekku Chan.
Because you're acting increasingly wolfish and are fighting rather fiercely to put the blame on Wojjan.
Derekku Chan wrote:
Wojjan wrote:
You didn't ask any questionsThat's what I asked. =)Derekku Chan wrote:
Why did he vote for m980? Other people "bandwangoned" after his vote on nardi, so why not change his vote to one of them? I'm just trying to state my opinion of what I think. I may be wrong, but who knows.0_o wrote:
Could you explain why you find Wojjan's vote suspicious?
Wojjan wrote:
m980 wrote:
Are you guys serious?
May as well join in
Sorry, m980, sounds pretty wolfy to me.
At least my posts tend to contain decent information the group can state their opinion on.Derekku also wrote:
You're joking, right? Also, you're hardly posting so don't call ME a lurker.Wojjan wrote:
You just made statements you did already, which is what I call not contributing to the game, and in that way, a form of lurking.
Derekku wrote:
Or maybe it's YOU that needs to play YOUR wolf role better.Wojjan wrote:
You gotta play your Wolf role better than that.
I had a reason for every possible argument I threw at you, and I'm only trying to get you to slip up and contradict. Which is pretty tough, considering you're just repeating the same argument over and over again.Derekku actually wrote:
No, you're stupiderer than me!
Derekku Chan wrote:
m980? *checks his posts again*
I guess you could say that he jumped on the bandwagon for being the 5th person to vote for nardi, but that would only make him suspicious of being a wolf. If he got night killed, then he's obviously NOT a wolf.
BUT, Wojjan was quick to do two things.
1) Jump on m980 for his vote.
2) Claim an aux role, which is an incredibly stupid thing to do at the beginning
I'm making my suspicion of this guy known.
Vote Wojjan
Derekku Chan wrote:
He didn't say that he was the guardian angel. We have no clue who that is.0_o wrote:
I have the strong impression that you are a wolf who is trying to get him lynched to avoid the guardian angel.What the fuck. So I give reasons for my vote, but that makes me suspicious?Saturos-fangirl wrote:
i trust Wojjan, and i think that we should until we have a good reason to disbelieve him. He had a pretty solid defense of being human and its too early to risk lynching aux roles.
im not voting yet, but i am directing a bit of suspicion on you, Derekku.
Also, why the hell do you trust Wojjan? I see NO "solid" defense that he's a townie. All he said was that he was an aux role. Is this some new logic that I missed? "Claim an aux role and you're automatically innocent." Seriously, what the fuck.
EDIT: tl;dr - Back up your reasoning. I guess I know what Echo feels like in these games. No wonder he always gets killed so fast :(
thepianist wrote:
Wait, I thought wolves can kill wolves as well - how would you know that m980 isn't a wolf? He very well may be...0_o wrote:
I'd think the fact that he isn't a wolf kind of goes without saying?Derekku Chan wrote:
...If he got night killed, then he's obviously NOT a wolf.
Derekku Chan wrote:
I think they can, but why the fuck would they kill one of themselves? There's no point in doing that, so my point stands.It goes the other way, too. There's really no reason to role claim early. His claim seemed to me like he was afraid of getting accused of being a wolf and claimed to protect himself.0_o wrote:
Claiming an aux role should make a human less inclined to vote for them (temporarily at least, until there is more information).It was NOT a random vote. What the fuck do you mean I know this? Wojjan said "Vote: m980 for bandwagoning and chipping in the extra votes to get a majority." Please read before accusing me. =|0_o wrote:
However, Derekku voted Wojjan with the reasons that:
1) he voted for m980 (which is pointless because most of first day's votings are random anyway, and Derekku knows this which is why I pointed it out)I don't see any evidence that he's truthful, either. He role claimed (which btw, I sometimes mean "aux claimed", but I have a habit or saying "role" instead), and people believed him, but that's not "proof".0_o wrote:
2) that he claimed an aux role (which, seeing as there is zero evidence right now that he is lying, should be a reason not to vote for him.)No one else is talking. There's nothing to go on. You HAVE to start somewhere. It seems like people are only fucking voting for me because I'm actually giving my opinion. Why don't you all start some discussion instead of throwing shit at me. Kthx0_o wrote:
It seems to me like he is just looking for reasons to make Wojjan look suspiciousAgain, we have to dig up knowledge. Unless this game is going to consist of random votes and "lol I believe this guy lol", we're not going to get anywhere.0_o wrote:
I'm not saying I'm 100% sure that Wojjan is who he says he is, but I am saying that we don't have nearly enough knowledge right now to vote for him and say he's lying.
EDIT: Take my words into account, everyone. Don't just jump in once a day to post your vote. Actually come in multiple times and discuss things. This can be a very fun game if people actually participate :)
Derekku Chan wrote:
Why did he vote for m980? Other people "bandwangoned" after his vote on nardi, so why not change his vote to one of them? I'm just trying to state my opinion of what I think. I may be wrong, but who knows.0_o wrote:
Could you explain why you find Wojjan's vote suspicious?
Derekku Chan wrote:
Please give a reason for your vote =)Two wrote:
vote Echo
Derekku Chan wrote:
@nardi: I'm sorry for helping to lynch you =( At least you're back :)
@Echo's death: damn... I thought he might be on the townie's side this game. But I guess we won't know for sure until SFG gets a report on him (if she really is the Coroner).
Derekku Chan wrote:
That's what I meant :< Well, provided you're telling the truth ;)Saturos-fangirl wrote:
err...im not the coroner, im the coroner's proxy.Derekku Chan wrote:
@Echo's death: damn... I thought he might be on the townie's side this game. But I guess we won't know for sure until SFG gets a report on him (if she really is the Coroner).
But I believe you so 8-)
Derekku Chan wrote:
I did what I did because it was the beginning and there really wasn't any information to go on. You looked suspicious imo so I went with it.Wojjan wrote:
My vote goes to Derekku aswell, since his reasons aren't really making sense and the entire group has a mutual opinion.
Note I'm not bandwagoning, if that's an accusation you're gonna throw at me. I suppose a part of my hunch is revenge for trying to make me look suspicious WAAAAy too hard
Could you all give reasons for why you're voting for me instead of "you're suspicious, etc"? =|
Derekku Chan wrote:
I already told you why I voted for you, but I'll repeat it again. There was nothing to go on besides random votes on some small talk. I picked up what I thought was suspicious (you) and went with it.Wojjan wrote:
'kay Derekku, here are my reasons
1) You're lurking, only repeating what we know and small-talking, not contributing anything but a load of arguments on me .
2) You're trying way too hard to dispatch of me, sort of suspicious as is
All these quotes are just there to make people believe him and lynch me.
So I'd take the innocent attitude you're playing elsewhere.
Court adjourned
@Me lurking: Wtf I think I've been posting more than any of you. Shouldn't all of the other lurkers be suspicious then, too? I don't like the way any of you think.
You guys want me to talk more? What the fuck do you expect me to say? -_-
This one deserves some extra attention since he used that reason before to make me suspiciousDerekku Chan wrote:
You know, YOUR vote for me was pretty baseless. Like I've said many times, "you're suspicious" is not a very good argument.adam2046 wrote:
Something incriminating ^_^
Derekku Chan wrote:
I don't want a phantom vote (even though I'll probably get killed by you ungrateful *mumbles* in the morning unless others post).
Voting: Wojjan because he still hasn't answered my questions and only seems to be targeting me because I targeted him. Unless I missed it, I still see no proof that he's an aux.
Derekku Chan wrote:
Wojjan wrote:
You didn't ask any questionsThat's what I asked. =)Derekku Chan wrote:
Why did he vote for m980? Other people "bandwangoned" after his vote on nardi, so why not change his vote to one of them? I'm just trying to state my opinion of what I think. I may be wrong, but who knows.0_o wrote:
Could you explain why you find Wojjan's vote suspicious?You're joking, right? :| Also, you're hardly posting so don't call ME a lurker.Wojjan wrote:
You just made statements you did already, which is what I call not contributing to the game, and in that way, a form of lurking.Or maybe it's YOU that needs to play YOUR wolf role better.Wojjan wrote:
You gotta play your Wolf role better than that.
You should be at 22 shots, and pretty drunk now.Derekku Chan wrote:
Fiercely? lolYellowYoshi1 wrote:
Voting for Derekku Chan.
Because you're acting increasingly wolfish and are fighting rather fiercely to put the blame on Wojjan.
I'm trying to get him to talk and answer me. I really don't see you talking other than to vote for me :roll:
Haha I love it when people get suspicious of me :3Saturos-fangirl wrote:
i have strong suspicions that adam, foulcoon, and ASH are wolves, but i cant confirm them until the aux team can check (read: insomniac + psychic)
at any rate, because of new data i have in on various people, i retract my vote and am now voting foulcoon