Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Other
  3. Off-Topic
  4. Forum Games
  5. Mafia

Themeless Mafia Game (TOWN WIN!)

posted
Total Posts
416
show more
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
VOTE COUNT:


animask (3) - foulcoon, Ekaru, DeathxShinigami
Ekaru (1) - NoHitter
NoHitter (1) - Wojjan
Mashley (1) - 0_o
Lilac (1) - pieguy1372
pieguy1372 (1) - Lilac
-Newbie- (1) - Mashley


Not voting (6) -LadySuburu, -Newbie-, Sync, bmin11, Rantai, animask
Sleep Powder
1,540 posts
Joined October 2008
Sleep Powder
Fos Mashley

That's a horrible reason to vote for Newbie. You're just voting for him because you don't want to vote off scum (which I see at least 2-3 people) RVS is obviously over and the discussion already started. You're probably too afraid to play seriously so you don't get lynched off.

@DxS You could at least add something to that because I know you're referring to someone else. Right now, I think NoHItter or Mashley could be mafia at this point. If I'm lynched, I'd go for NoHItter too.

Vote: NoHItter
bmin11
5,438 posts
Joined October 2008
bmin11
Can you explain your thoughts on NoHItter?
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley

animask wrote:

RVS is obviously over and the discussion already started
Like I said, everything so far has just been the usual day one stuff. It's quite clear that Ekaru is a newbie (not saying they can't be mafia of course), and none of the following discussion is especially scummy and it mostly rational, if a little sensationalist. It makes no sense to lynch people who have been genuinely contributing, as the lynch on day one is always just luck based unless a scum seriously gives themselves away.
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Right 6 hours left and not a strong suspicion at this moment outside Ekaru.

Vote: Ekaru, you're the only one that stands out at all at this moment.
NoHitter
osu! Alumni
3,785 posts
Joined June 2009
NoHitter
Come on guys. We still have RVS votes on the table.
Unvote, vote and explain your reasoning.

Edit:
Mod: Perhaps an extension of 24 hours? There's a lot of people who haven't posted for more than a day's time.
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
I don't think so, you want activeness, generate it, 72 hours is more than enough.



DEADLINE IS IN 1 HOUR
DeathxShinigami
1,176 posts
Joined November 2008
DeathxShinigami
Before the day ends in about 14 minutes I'd like to point out that Lilac, Newbie, and foulcoon haven't done must else besides single posting within the entire Day 1.

Unvote
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
So vote Newbie before an actual poster gets lynched
DeathxShinigami
1,176 posts
Joined November 2008
DeathxShinigami
Vote: -Newbie-

Sadly no strong arguments for a newbie lynch rather than a animask. More of a "Who would you rather keep post D1?" reasoning for why I'm voting on newbie.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
deadline already went and gone afaik
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Huh... pretty sure that's a NoHItter lynch if I'm looking at this right.
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
No, 6 minutes till deadline.
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
VOTE COUNT:


animask (2) - foulcoon, Ekaru
Ekaru (2) - NoHitter, Rantai
NoHitter (2) - Wojjan, animask
-Newbie- (2) - Mashley, DeathxShinigami
Mashley (1) - 0_o
Lilac (1) - pieguy1372
pieguy1372 (1) - Lilac



Not voting (4) -LadySuburu, -Newbie-, Sync, bmin11



animask - Mafia Roleblocker - Lynched D1



IT IS NOW NIGHT 1, DEADLINE IS IN 24 HOURS
Sleep Powder
1,540 posts
Joined October 2008
Sleep Powder
My prophecy is coming true! Go Town!
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
NoHitter - Role Morpher (Voyeur) - Died Night 1




IT IS NOW DAY 2, WITH 13 ALIVE IT TAKES 7 TO LYNCH
DEADLINE IS IN 72 HOURS
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
I fucking told you
DeathxShinigami
1,176 posts
Joined November 2008
DeathxShinigami
Vote: -Newbie-

Doesn't seem much sense at first but animask didn't bandwagon on -Newbie- pretty much just ignoring him the entire D1.
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
wrong about NoHItter but I fucking told you regardless. raises the question how many other scum took a chance with the Ekaru bw? I'm gonna assume that in a 15-man setup there's 4 mafia, no third parties because that ain't Salvage's swag.
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
DxS that makes a surprising amount of sense but I actually would rather consider the people who DID misdirect from animask lynch to newbie lynch. Newbie was a lurker, stand pat while I look up who answered no to the lynching lurkers idea
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
I really don't like Mashley's ISO atm. Enough to warrant a vote for the newbie bw alone but put that randavote response in with it and mix it with a FEEL and LUCKY GUESSING I'm willing to lynch him bad.

ALSO: animask's prophecy FYI is probably just him getting lynched D1. Not reading more into that.
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Heh I knew Hitter was town (judging by his play). But with animask's flip everything I thought has been completely thrown off. Hrm.

Also sleep time~
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan

Rantai wrote:

The omgus is strong in that one.
LAST TIME Rantai suspected someone off of omgus he was mafia.
0_o
2,155 posts
Joined December 2008
0_o
Sorry for being lazy, was busy with other stuff. I'll try to stay on top of things now.

Anyway, anyone else feel like we should be looking at the inactives here? animask was lynched with 2 votes, it would have been easy as anything to push the vote onto someone else. I'm thinking the only way that could happen is if the mafia wasn't aware of the situation. Either that or they were afraid of looking scummy, but it's not like animask was the general consensus for the lynch here.

And yes I realize I'm being extremely hypocritical, but nonetheless my point still stands.
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
well
they were trying weren't they?
If they pushed the lynch on someone else active they'd need a good argument else they're just baselessly protecting a scumpartner which puts them in the limelight. Lynches on me or NoHItter, both being town, would just make people suspect animask more which is why they pushed on -Newbie- in order to not step on anything.
0_o
2,155 posts
Joined December 2008
0_o

Wojjan wrote:

well
they were trying weren't they?
If Newbie was town, another mafioso could have easily put another vote on him and I'm pretty sure no one would bat an eye. Maybe I didn't read thoroughly enough, but I don't think there was enough suspicion on animask that saving him would warrant much suspicion.
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
The newbie lynch started like two hours away from deadline so it's probably just people not being online. And there was enough going on that day that after all the discussion a lynch on newbie would've made me bat an eye at least.
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
I mean I would've understood more of they lynched me than newbie
NoHitter
osu! Alumni
3,785 posts
Joined June 2009
NoHitter
... And I thought I wouldn't die.
Also, is there any possibility of having a Dead Chat?
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
Yes, creating it in a few minutes.
Ekaru
3,617 posts
Joined July 2008
Ekaru
Mod: Prod -Newbie-, please. He hasn't posted in like forever. I want him to have a chance to explain himself before I agree with DxS and vote for him.
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
Proded pieguy and Newbie, if they do not respond in 10 hours i'll replace them.
foulcoon
osu! Alumni
1,384 posts
Joined July 2008
foulcoon
Vote: Mashley

lets get mafia #2
foulcoon
osu! Alumni
1,384 posts
Joined July 2008
foulcoon

Mashley wrote:

animask wrote:

RVS is obviously over and the discussion already started
Like I said, everything so far has just been the usual day one stuff. It's quite clear that Ekaru is a newbie (not saying they can't be mafia of course), and none of the following discussion is especially scummy and it mostly rational, if a little sensationalist. It makes no sense to lynch people who have been genuinely contributing, as the lynch on day one is always just luck based unless a scum seriously gives themselves away.

Mashley wrote:

So vote Newbie before an actual poster gets lynched

if you wanted my reasoning
Sync
osu! Alumni
1,575 posts
Joined April 2011
Sync
oh my god I was sleeping when the day ended but lynching mafia D1 was badass as fuck

also, a newbie lynch is stupid. he's only posted 3 times and people who are rushing a newbie lynch are scummier than the grease that allocates under an unwashed mcdonald's deep fryer

*BAM*
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Wow, nice description there.

foulcoon actually has a pretty solid point. After pointing it out I can see how badly Mashley was deflecting into a lurker. Huh.
Sync
osu! Alumni
1,575 posts
Joined April 2011
Sync
thanks~

also can't tell if foulcoon has, for the first time (in a game we were both in), voted for somebody with reason before he was asked

he was mafia in most of those games

probably town or just fucking with my head

</meta>
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
It's not as if animask's lynch was a genuine consensus at the deadline; he had two votes on him for crying out loud. It simply came down to people not being active enough at the end of the day to actually discuss and form a consensus on who the most suitable lynch would be. I tried to start discussion, of course in the end animask flipped scum so it was a good lynch but it could have gone very badly.
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
Vote: Mashley

you jus mad cause I called scum D1
Ekaru
3,617 posts
Joined July 2008
Ekaru

Mashley wrote:

he had two votes on him for crying out loud.
...You're conveniently ignoring the fact that when you voted for Newbie animask had 3 votes on him, not 2; in other words, animask had an extremely high chance of getting lynched at that point in time unless you managed to get votes off of animask. The 3 people who were voting on animask at that time clearly weren't going to go for Ekaru or NoHItter, so you had to bring up somebody else instead. Who else to go for than a lurker?

Combine this oh-so-convenient overlook with what foulcoon and Wojjan have already said and I'm definitely going with...

vote: Mashley
Ekaru
3,617 posts
Joined July 2008
Ekaru
*Yes, I know you said 2 votes at the deadline, but what I mean is that you're ignoring what the votes were at the time you voted in favor of the more-favorable-for-you deadline votes.
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley

Ekaru wrote:

...You're conveniently ignoring the fact that when you voted for Newbie animask had 3 votes on him, not 2
Your point is? That still leaves a huge number who hadn't voted or discussed who we should lynch at at all. In a 15 person game 3 votes is nothing. There was little to no genuine suspicion about animask as far as I know, and those were just the typical votes that animask gets when he posts his usual gibberish so it was actually quite a shock when he actually flipped town. At that point, as always Day 1 there were no strong arguments for lynching anyone, so the best policy had to be lynching a lurker. I mean look at the final vote count, there were three other people with the same number of votes as animask, he only actually got lynched because of when the votes were cast.
Of course I'm not saying we shouldn't have lynched animask but you have to look back to Day One and think, was there ever sufficient reasoning to lynch animask? No, of course not. We got lucky.
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
Have you read Day one? I had superfluous reason to suspect both animask and nohitter.
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
I-I skimmed it D:
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan
well then read it for real, you were there for the most part so it only confuses me more why you wouldn't make a case on what had happened so far and lynch newbie instead
foulcoon
osu! Alumni
1,384 posts
Joined July 2008
foulcoon
yeah Sync, I'm obviously mafia and fucking with you, which is why I left my vote on a mafia member instead of easily saving them by unvoting.

don't worry mashley, if you flip town we'll lynch DxS.

also Wojjan don't take credit for something I called a mile away okay. you didnt even vote for him!

p.s. Thanks whoever voted with me (ekaru i think).
DeathxShinigami
1,176 posts
Joined November 2008
DeathxShinigami
Nope.

Roleclaim: Motivator

I motivated Ekaru N1. Carry on now.
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan

foulcoon wrote:

yeah Sync, I'm obviously mafia and fucking with you, which is why I left my vote on a mafia member instead of easily saving them by unvoting.

don't worry mashley, if you flip town we'll lynch DxS.

also Wojjan don't take credit for something I called a mile away okay. you didnt even vote for him!

p.s. Thanks whoever voted with me (ekaru i think).
huh, turns out you did call it

alright let foulcoon lead town
LadySuburu
80 posts
Joined June 2008
LadySuburu
I'm leaning mash too, but that's mostly a gut thing.
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Wojjan


promise me mashley's head
DeathxShinigami
1,176 posts
Joined November 2008
DeathxShinigami
Unvote
Ekaru
3,617 posts
Joined July 2008
Ekaru

DeathxShinigami wrote:

Nope.

Roleclaim: Motivator

I motivated Ekaru N1. Carry on now.
For the record, I got no notification that I was motivated. You guys can take that as you will.
foulcoon
osu! Alumni
1,384 posts
Joined July 2008
foulcoon

DeathxShinigami wrote:

Nope.

Roleclaim: Motivator

I motivated Ekaru N1. Carry on now.
more like mafia motivator who last minute vote changed in an effort to not lynch their mafia buddy
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
JInxyjem replaces -Newbie-


Ivalset replaces pieguy1372
Jinxy
2,777 posts
Joined February 2009
Jinxy
Yo

I won't be able to read nor post until.a few.hours, I still have.classes

those dots are.typos ignore them
Ivalset
osu! Alumni
1,522 posts
Here since the beginning
Ivalset
Evening folks.

Going to reread the thread, etc.
Sync
osu! Alumni
1,575 posts
Joined April 2011
Sync
hi
Jinxy
2,777 posts
Joined February 2009
Jinxy
From what I can see right now, DxS is suspicious to me. He was also voting for Newbie over animask in Day 1, with a pretty weak reason too.

Then he was suggested as a lynch by foul and claimed right there and then, as a motivator who targeted Ekaru. Ekaru's reply:

Ekaru wrote:

DeathxShinigami wrote:

Nope.

Roleclaim: Motivator

I motivated Ekaru N1. Carry on now.
For the record, I got no notification that I was motivated. You guys can take that as you will.
However, the only thing that doesn't go well with my suspicions is that DxS could have made much better claims than one that's easily refuted. Possibly roleblocked?

But then again, this is the man who claimed Innocent Child in Celebrity, so I dunno
Ekaru
3,617 posts
Joined July 2008
Ekaru
Okay, I got the motivation notification overnight. Salvage just missed it the first time, apparently. XP
Jinxy
2,777 posts
Joined February 2009
Jinxy
...k.
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
DAY EXTENDED BY 12 HOURS
Jinxy
2,777 posts
Joined February 2009
Jinxy
Around 42 more hours
Ivalset
osu! Alumni
1,522 posts
Here since the beginning
Ivalset

Rantai wrote:

Huh... pretty sure that's a NoHItter lynch if I'm looking at this right.
This line stands out to me pretty heavily. It seems like at the last minute of day 1, there was a fair amount of vote shuffling in a misguided attempt to avoid lynching animask via tied votes. DxS brought animask's votes to 3, then animask pushed NoHItter up to 2, then DxS unvotes and votes for Newbie instead, possibly hoping that animask going from 3 -> 2 would put him behind NoHItter in the lynch line.

For this reasoning I find all of Mashley, DxS and Rantai to be suspicious in different degrees.

Mashley for clearly attempting to save animask by persuading people to vote for a lurker instead.
DxS for his actions - pushing animask above 2 then back down to 2.
and Rantai for misreading the tied vote rules and bringing attention to the vote changes.

I'm quite comfortable with a Mashley lynch right now, so Vote: Mashley
foulcoon
osu! Alumni
1,384 posts
Joined July 2008
foulcoon

Ivalset wrote:

Rantai wrote:

Huh... pretty sure that's a NoHItter lynch if I'm looking at this right.
This line stands out to me pretty heavily. It seems like at the last minute of day 1, there was a fair amount of vote shuffling in a misguided attempt to avoid lynching animask via tied votes. DxS brought animask's votes to 3, then animask pushed NoHItter up to 2, then DxS unvotes and votes for Newbie instead, possibly hoping that animask going from 3 -> 2 would put him behind NoHItter in the lynch line.

For this reasoning I find all of Mashley, DxS and Rantai to be suspicious in different degrees.

Mashley for clearly attempting to save animask by persuading people to vote for a lurker instead.
DxS for his actions - pushing animask above 2 then back down to 2.
and Rantai for misreading the tied vote rules and bringing attention to the vote changes.

I'm quite comfortable with a Mashley lynch right now, so Vote: Mashley
well to be fair, even though DxS looks scummy, if it weren't for his vote + unvote animask wouldnt have been lynched...
Ivalset
osu! Alumni
1,522 posts
Here since the beginning
Ivalset
Pretty sure he still would have. Animask was at 2 votes and at the top of the lynch list before dxs voted and unvoted.
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Huh. No.

I went through it carefully. Hitter was the first to 2 votes, not animask. This is based off an earlier game (ages ago, can't remember which game) where the mechanics worked via:

SPOILER
A is at 2
B is 3

B to be lynched

A is at 2
B is unvoted to 2

A to be lynched

Take that as you will. In the end it was a mod decision where my words hold no sway.
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
And yes, I do know that was your argument against me.
Ivalset
osu! Alumni
1,522 posts
Here since the beginning
Ivalset
Those were mechanics introduced into two's first mafia game but were changed before the game started. Interestingly enough, you were involved in the discussion.

viewtopic.php?p=1027357#p1027357

Discussion on the tied vote rule is on the first two pages.

viewtopic.php?p=1330260#p1330260 is where animask is solidified at 2 votes and never falls below that. At that point in time, animask is second on the lynch list - viewtopic.php?p=1330461#p1330461

Later, sync brings ekaru up to 3 votes but then unvotes, then animask unvotes ekaru and seals his own fate by bringing himself to the top of the lynch list. Furthermore, Nohitter drops to 1 vote viewtopic.php?p=1333209#p1333209 when mashley votes for newbie instead. When animask switches to nohitter and puts him at 2 votes, animask is still first to be lynched because he reached 2 votes before nohitter did.

Also, there's an example of how tied votes works in this game in the first post!
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
The first post doesn't cover 3 to 2~ (it's a 2v2 situation)

Though thanks for reminding me where that discussion took place. It seems I got the original mechanic stuck in my head.

Well then, that's cleared up for me.
bmin11
5,438 posts
Joined October 2008
bmin11
will post after dinner. I'm so behind of this game orz
bmin11
5,438 posts
Joined October 2008
bmin11
I understand that the voting was very odd last night. They could have really just focused someone so animask won't get lynched. However, one post animask has made gave me a pretty bad impression.

animask wrote:

Fos Mashley

*Reasons why he FoSes Mashley*


Vote: NoHItter
This is very odd and makes me pretty confident that animask is trying to distance Mashley. Like, he explains a lot about Mashley, but ends up voting for NoHItter without his own reasoning :<


Vote: Mashley
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
VOTE COUNT:


Mashley (5) - foulcoon, Ekaru, Wojjan, Ivalset, bmin11




Not voting (8) -LadySuburu, JInxjyjem, DeathxShinigami, Mashley, 0_o, Sync, Rantai, Lilac
Sync
osu! Alumni
1,575 posts
Joined April 2011
Sync
vote Mashley

SHEEP SHEEP SHEEP SHEEP

actually the relationship between animask and mashley is pretty hilarious
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
Roleclaim Doublevoter
Seriously I can't even defend myself against this... My day one vote looked scummy out of pure coincidence, and if people are so convinced that I'm scum there's nothing I can do. My second vote shows as anonymous and is cast through PM, which is weird since as I understand it's usually just cast in the thread through 'vote 2:' or whatever... I dunno about that though.
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
inb4 scum jumps in and hammers me
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Well proving a double voter isn't hard I guess.

But that role can swing both ways so er yeah, not sure if I can believe you're town right now.
bmin11
5,438 posts
Joined October 2008
bmin11
Argh, the problem with double voters are that they can easily be a vote stealer. We could try to tie the vote up until N-1 with someone majority and make Mashley to hammer to see if the vote was stolen was double voted.
Ivalset
osu! Alumni
1,522 posts
Here since the beginning
Ivalset
Well, if you're a double voter then vote for someone twice and we'll see it as anonymous on the votecount. That seems pretty easy to test.
LadySuburu
80 posts
Joined June 2008
LadySuburu
We can prove his claim, but we can't prove that he's town.


As a purely role-based look:

Anonymous doublevoter benefits scum more than town. (Is better as a scum role)

Open doublevoter benefits town more than scum. (Is better as a town role)


Now, with that being said we've had tons of roles in recent games that would generally be thought of as scum-aligned that aren't. I'm not sure that his claim being true or not should change anything about how scummy he is.
0_o
2,155 posts
Joined December 2008
0_o
Yeah, even if he is telling the truth there's nothing about the role that really clears him. Worse case scenario we mislynch a scummy town doublevoter, which as far as aux roles go, is one of the safer ones to lose.

Any objections to a hammer?
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
Oh right
Vote foulcoon
Second vote should show up in the next votecount.
Jinxy
2,777 posts
Joined February 2009
Jinxy
Hm, day ended 2 hours ago I believe

Or did I fuck up times again
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
VOTE COUNT:


Mashley (5) - foulcoon, Ekaru, Wojjan, Ivalset, bmin11
foulcoon (1) - Mashley
Mashley (1) - Billy Bob




Not voting (7) -LadySuburu, JInxjyjem, DeathxShinigami, 0_o, Sync, Rantai, Lilac





Mashley - Mafia 1-Shot Janitor - Lynched D2




IT IS NOW NIGHT 2, DEADLINE IS IN 24 HOURS
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Topic Starter
Salvage
Nobody died.



IT IS NOW DAY 3, DEADLINE IS IN 72 HOURS
Sync
osu! Alumni
1,575 posts
Joined April 2011
Sync
lol'd

is mafia completely inactive or some shit
foulcoon
osu! Alumni
1,384 posts
Joined July 2008
foulcoon
you guys love me.

okay im thinking DxS for lynch

also thinking LS is town
foulcoon
osu! Alumni
1,384 posts
Joined July 2008
foulcoon
first off im thinking one of the two replacement people could be mafia. just depends on who was more likely, pieguy or -Newbie-

also read the bold:

Ivalset wrote:

Those were mechanics introduced into two's first mafia game but were changed before the game started. Interestingly enough, you were involved in the discussion.

viewtopic.php?p=1027357#p1027357

Discussion on the tied vote rule is on the first two pages.

viewtopic.php?p=1330260#p1330260 is where animask is solidified at 2 votes and never falls below that. At that point in time, animask is second on the lynch list - viewtopic.php?p=1330461#p1330461

Later, sync brings ekaru up to 3 votes but then unvotes, then animask unvotes ekaru and seals his own fate by bringing himself to the top of the lynch list. Furthermore, Nohitter drops to 1 vote viewtopic.php?p=1333209#p1333209 when mashley votes for newbie instead. When animask switches to nohitter and puts him at 2 votes, animask is still first to be lynched because he reached 2 votes before nohitter did.

Also, there's an example of how tied votes works in this game in the first post!
havent considered the possibility that sync and or ekaru are mafia yet.

any thoughts?
Ivalset
osu! Alumni
1,522 posts
Here since the beginning
Ivalset
I don't think Ekaru is mafia simply because it seems ridiculous to allow animask to be lynched that easily d1.

I'm honestly even more surprised that no one died.

I'm fine with a DxS lynch and maybe a Sync lynch. Really not convinced on an Ekaru lynch.
Ekaru
3,617 posts
Joined July 2008
Ekaru
havent considered the possibility that sync and or ekaru are mafia yet.

any thoughts?
If I was mafia then I would've voted for NoHItter on day one, not animask. ;P
bmin11
5,438 posts
Joined October 2008
bmin11
I'm up Lilac just purely for his inactiveness.


By the way, how many mafias do you guys expect?
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
18 players. I'd say 4 possibly 5 but that's pushing it.

Also; Vote: 0_o

0_o wrote:

Yeah, even if he is telling the truth there's nothing about the role that really clears him. Worse case scenario we mislynch a scummy town doublevoter, which as far as aux roles go, is one of the safer ones to lose.

Any objections to a hammer?
Echo, justifying possible town lynch (under the guise of 'safe'), fishing for hammer confirmation. To a lesser degree a vote on Mashley in rvs (distancing anyone?).
bmin11
5,438 posts
Joined October 2008
bmin11
Good point

My lynch list: Lilac, DxS, 0_o
Ivalset
osu! Alumni
1,522 posts
Here since the beginning
Ivalset

Rantai wrote:

18 players. I'd say 4 possibly 5 but that's pushing it.
You must be drunk.
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
5:13 probably an indy. Maybe 5:12:1?

Sitting close to a 2 for 1. 4:13:1 seems a bit more reasonable.
Ivalset
osu! Alumni
1,522 posts
Here since the beginning
Ivalset

Salvage wrote:

Hi guys, so this is my first mafia game hosted and hopefully not my last one .. i don't know if i'd really want to host another one but we'll see.



So well .. there is not much to say, registration right here and rules at the bottom, 15 players max (: .. roles are premade (not PyP) so yeah, go then love u all.
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
I am drunk. I counted the total players with the dead players.
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Well given 15 I'd say 4 for sure.

Them deceptive strikes.
DeathxShinigami
1,176 posts
Joined November 2008
DeathxShinigami
I ended up motivating LS in N2 so okay.

If you wanna lynch me fine by me but I'll flip town~
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
You know, I actually believe that.

Just because it's not a ridiculous claim for once.
Ekaru
3,617 posts
Joined July 2008
Ekaru
Mod: Prod Lilac please.

I've seen him lurking before and he still hasn't posted in like forever.

Other than that, yeah, I'm suspicious of 0_o simply for coming out of nowhere and then going, "Yeah, he's pretty much the best choice to lynch today. Any objections to hammering him?" Why ask to hammer in that case? The only reason to ask is if you're consciously trying to come off as a cautious townie. If you were town then you'd just go for the hammer because, as he just said, there was pretty much nothing to lose. He *knew* that, but asked anyway... Probably because, again, he wanted to come off as pro-town.

Vote: 0_o
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
142 / 416