nyaaaaaaaaaaa~ 
forum
M2U - BlythE (Osuka)
posted
Total Posts
413
Don't know why this isn't approved already.
Star ;D
Star ;D
Ok, time to get serious about this one.
I tried my best searching for possible mistakes in this awesome experiment (i even tried comparing original gameplay videos but i see some stuff that's impossible to implement so i guess you didn't go for 100% authenticity and i gave up comparing everything) aaaand there's only one little thing i found:
[Maniac]: 01:45:583 - the hold line is cutted. Very hard to notice in editor, easy to see while playing.
Other questions i wanted to ask (like KIAI) were answered by watching some gameplays, so i have nothing else to say about this.
I'm gonna ask around because i want to see this approved.
I tried my best searching for possible mistakes in this awesome experiment (i even tried comparing original gameplay videos but i see some stuff that's impossible to implement so i guess you didn't go for 100% authenticity and i gave up comparing everything) aaaand there's only one little thing i found:
[Maniac]: 01:45:583 - the hold line is cutted. Very hard to notice in editor, easy to see while playing.
Other questions i wanted to ask (like KIAI) were answered by watching some gameplays, so i have nothing else to say about this.
I'm gonna ask around because i want to see this approved.
Topic Starter
Huzzah!Card N'FoRcE wrote:
Ok, time to get serious about this one.
Yeah 2 notes at the same time, some huge jumps. Those things were omitted, or I took some liberties. It's best not to try for authenticity here, but for playability and obvious errors (like miu pointed out earlier).Card N'FoRcE wrote:
(i even tried comparing original gameplay videos but i see some stuff that's impossible to implement so i guess you didn't go for 100% authenticity and i gave up comparing everything)
Card N'FoRcE wrote:
[Maniac]: 01:45:583 - the hold line is cutted. Very hard to notice in editor, easy to see while playing.
But it's been so long that I don't remember. I've extended it out to fill in, the jump's now a bit harder at 2.5x.ziin wrote:
01:45:583 - ^ These are authentic, but technika fills in the bar. I didn't want to, as it was confusing to me, and the timing bar is still on the screen in osu, but disappears in technika. It's an easy fix later if I want to extend the first part out further.
blissful is supposed to be modding it at some point in time.
Oh i thought it was a mistake because i didn't see any other like that one and the hold still had the sound, so :I
(Blame laziness for 9 pages of thread)
Well, I'm gonna have another look in some days.
(Blame laziness for 9 pages of thread)
Well, I'm gonna have another look in some days.
Topic Starter
that's because hard has more difficult rhythms. Maniac is one long stream.MercurialSpectre wrote:
Hard is more hardest than Maniac or something?
Oh well...
Nice map.-
I've tried this map on easy and laugh myself out loud failing hard 
Reminding me first time playing Osu! with those D ranks. And some thought here, I see CnF was a BAT that dare enough to get... how to say " different" than the other mapset for approval. Keep up the good work
Reminding me first time playing Osu! with those D ranks. And some thought here, I see CnF was a BAT that dare enough to get... how to say " different" than the other mapset for approval. Keep up the good workOk then.
I rechecked it and i don't have anything else to say.
At the current state it's still unknown if this map will get into the Approved group or not, so for the moment i have to tell you to wait for an answer from someone higher than me (this should happen in the near future).
If it will be able to go for Approval, I'll be sure to give a bubble.
Best of luck.
I rechecked it and i don't have anything else to say.
At the current state it's still unknown if this map will get into the Approved group or not, so for the moment i have to tell you to wait for an answer from someone higher than me (this should happen in the near future).
If it will be able to go for Approval, I'll be sure to give a bubble.
Best of luck.
Odd, I thought I had starred this.
Anyways, this is a lovely piece of work you have here. Please continue with the good work if you have the time.
Love ~
Anyways, this is a lovely piece of work you have here. Please continue with the good work if you have the time.
Love ~
Topic Starter
Oh drat I can't just put
ho hum then. It seems that nobody other than theowest and a few other non-bats have a problem with approving this. If anyone has concerns about it, reasons why it shouldn't get a scoreboard, I'd like to hear them.
If possible, I would like this map to be archived in some way if it's not approved so that it does not count towards your stats, but it does have a scoreboard. It's clearly a different type of game altogether.
Oh well, it's just a game.
So much pink stars here, but this map deserves them. Star.
A different scoreboard? It would be amazing.
Your message is too short. Please do not post messages like "star", and make sure you are constructively adding to the thread in question.
A different scoreboard? It would be amazing.
Your message is too short. Please do not post messages like "star", and make sure you are constructively adding to the thread in question.
oh right i forgot i had 3 kudosu here you go
if regular stars were removed it's still be 2nd in priority, i'm sure, lol
Good luck.
My message is very long. Very very long.[lucky:1ed5b]baka[/lucky:1ed5b]
My message is very long. Very very long.[lucky:1ed5b]baka[/lucky:1ed5b]
Catching up on our modding queue 
I really don't see anything that could stop this from being approved, I will have to ask CnF what the convo with peppy resulted in.
Assuming this actually gets allowed I will be happy to bubble/approve this~
Have some kudosu stars for now
I really don't see anything that could stop this from being approved, I will have to ask CnF what the convo with peppy resulted in.
Assuming this actually gets allowed I will be happy to bubble/approve this~
Have some kudosu stars for now
Topic Starter
Stuff fixed in hard and did a full submit after shaving off a few bytes from the pngs.
I might even be able to get airwave not-nuked omg.
I might even be able to get airwave not-nuked omg.
There's a flash game called 'DJmaniax' that plays exactly like this in mouse mode. ^^
Nice map~
Nice map~
Topic Starter
oh god it's slow as hell. The higher levels are impossible with mouse...
also lol at your sc map. Not going to play it, but it's an interesting use of epd/eud.
also lol at your sc map. Not going to play it, but it's an interesting use of epd/eud.
I wonder if it possible to make DJ MAX Technika as game mode such as taiko and CTB. It would be really awesome.
We already have osu! for that
and osu! > Technika
and osu! > Technika
I'm quite tired of osu and i'm sure that it's not only me. Technika definitely can make game more entertaining.
If a BPM modifiable template were to be made of this SB or something of the sort, IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITIES
Topic Starter
That's essentially what I do.
However the only thing that changes is the bar speed. Once I get off my ass and do some work on oblivion, I may get something that works a little better.
However the only thing that changes is the bar speed. Once I get off my ass and do some work on oblivion, I may get something that works a little better.
Mh... this map has tons of tons of tons of tons of tons of stars but I guess it'll never go ranking... you think approval would be acceptable?
Why this is not approved ?
well, it's because of Derekku-proposed rules, the Approved should follow the same rules as Ranked
Topic Starter
I haven't gotten an answer, and I'm tired of asking.
This is probably just gonna eat up your pending slot :p unless you lock this orz
Topic Starter
lol I didn't even know that existed.gyt wrote:
Heh, this shit was ranked in 2011, because it's technically rankable. But this one stays in pending with 356 stars, because it's much more playable and creative. Nice!
*sigh*Alace wrote:
good SHIT
ranked
If this happened after May I would probably be pissed off.
May of next year? lolziin wrote:
*sigh*Alace wrote:
good SHIT
ranked
If this happened after May I would probably be pissed off.
Topic Starter
no, may of this year. Map wasn't finished until April, and that map was ranked at the same time.
Lol u have spent so many stars on this to make this aproved and u still dont get it...ziin wrote:
no, may of this year. Map wasn't finished until April, and that map was ranked at the same time.
Matbats ignoring maps with hundreds of stars... (?) sigh~
Topic Starter
almost everyone knows about it, they just don't want to approve it/be the person to approve it, since the rules are (still) up in the air.
http://puu.sh/8AWe
wow this map very good
i like technika pattern
airwave hd very hard ;;
duplication sorry.................
wow this map very good
i like technika pattern
airwave hd very hard ;;
duplication sorry.................
Two KDS <33
I hope this map go to fly in the Ranked maps
I hope this map go to fly in the Ranked maps
Topic Starter
I'll be pending forever
And ever.
And ever.
x99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.9ziin wrote:
I'll be pending forever
And ever.
What the...? It's really can became ranked?
Topic Starter
Peppy said yes, ztrot said no.
ziin, when will ranked these maps, osu! falls down.
pending forever
Player can delete SB elements and skin to play this map with approachcircle, so this might be unfair to the player who play this map in what it suppose to. Unless osz2 coming 
Topic Starter
I find it easier to play without the approach circle.
osz2 is pending forever too.
osz2 is pending forever too.
yes, we know that osz2 is coming since 487454546874864648years and it's actually not here.
By the way, this kind of beatmap should be more often used.. Should be more fun.
I'll try... maybe... if i've time... :v
( Star )
By the way, this kind of beatmap should be more often used.. Should be more fun.
I'll try... maybe... if i've time... :v
( Star )
You are a Genius.
OSUKA ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nice one.Current Priority: +420 (1 maps higher on the list)
The BAT'S always gona see this
The BAT'S always gona see this
Topic Starter
My goal is 1000. Or at least more than deltamax.
Good luck ♥ziin wrote:
My goal is 1000. Or at least more than deltamax.
I don't see any reason why this shouldn't be approved. I though the original purpose of the approved section was for non-standard maps that are fun anyway. Lots of work have been done here and it should be rewareded
never grave
.
Topic Starter
Why would hard rock prevent it from being ranked?
.
Topic Starter
Well hidden removes the approach circles (which I have already done) so hard rock just flips it. Thus you essentially have to play this map on hidden. It's no different from playing a normal osu map with irregular spacing and strange blue bars distracting you and also happen to pass x axis at the right time you're supposed to hit that note.
I agreed that Hardrock really ruin this map, but this is not a valid reason make this one unrank.
Plus there is no such rule or guildeline talking about it, I think it will probably be OK.
take my support and star~
Plus there is no such rule or guildeline talking about it, I think it will probably be OK.
take my support and star~
Topic Starter
2009 vs 2012
Omgomgomgomgomgomg.
That's awesooome ! /has no kds. Sorry.
http://puu.sh/myul here's an exemple of Hard Rock. ._.
That's awesooome ! /has no kds. Sorry.
Oh, great. I was looking for this. LOLAoko Kuroba wrote:
Why is this map approved and this isn't?!
http://puu.sh/myul here's an exemple of Hard Rock. ._.
Topic Starter
you can clearly see the approach bar at the bottom.
That other map doesn't even have a tutorial. Gods.
Lemme kick this map a star :O
Lemme kick this map a star :O
(Looks at his kudowallet. Sees 1 Star. Throws 1 Star)
Was there ever a stated reason as to why this map can't be approved?
Topic Starter
skinning out the approach circle is probably enough for it to be denied. That's likely the only "unrankable" thing, though if this were an osu map it would be horrible, and shouldn't be ranked (again). I'll actively push for approval when newrules/osz2 comes out, or I get 1000 stars. We're almost halfway there.
omg why cant we make it ranked - -
Heh, I have only 3 free kds, but anyway: take it!
Maybe second unrankable issue is that Stack Leniency is set to minimum?
Maybe second unrankable issue is that Stack Leniency is set to minimum?
Topic Starter
oh crap yo it almost got graved
Aaah, a nice even +500.
I know someone's going to break it really fast, but whatever.
I know someone's going to break it really fast, but whatever.
^uehuehuehuehuh
Topic Starter
why did this grave?
This is no scienceziin wrote:
why did this grave?
Having a map grave or not is based on the creator posting/updating or not as of recently.
Topic Starter
Guess I need to fix the skin and get this back in pending.
If you get this back in pending I will star it for you.
can't be ranked means nothing, we've all enjoyed this
good job ziin
good job ziin
This is so amazing.
It's back!
Topic Starter
I still don't understand how it got gone.
You got my 3 last kudosu!
This is soooooo great
This is soooooo great
COOL!! 
ohyes!♥
Topic Starter
So I guess only the beatmap creator can keep a map from graving now. Good to know.
Topic Starter
THAT WASN'T 4 WEEKS
[Hard]
----
[Easy](I couldn't find any lite mixing videos...)
Maniac → Technical Mixing
right?
- 00:12:333 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Following the pitch, is something like this
- 00:21:500 (x) - Add a normal note one line underr the last and
- 00:21:833 (x) - Add a normal note at y 288 ?
- 00:31:333 (2) - +1 repeat (to make it end at the same sound of the start)
- 00:36:166 (x) - Expected note y 256 ?
- 00:43:833 (1) - If it's following the ever~, it should end in the big white tick
- 00:59:333 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Blue Hold ?
- 01:04:000 (5) - "The-", one line higher than the last since is higher pitched
- 01:09:500 (1,2,3,4) - Since 01:08:833 (5,6,7,8) - went up, this can went down?
- 01:17:500 (1,2,3,4) - Since the jump are quite large, I suggest to do this
- 01:23:833 (5,6,7) - Move the notes one line under for this (since the jump does not quite fit)
- 01:26:500 (1) - e - ver~ stays better than a single hold
- 01:37:500 (x) - Add normal note here
- 01:45:166 (1) - Instead, an hold that start from 01:45:000 (x) - ?
- 01:46:000 (4,1,2,1) - uhm, use a different pattern? it's not quite easy to intuit it
- 01:51:166 (x) - Add a normal note for "I" ?
----
[Easy](I couldn't find any lite mixing videos...)
- 01:10:166 (x) - Add note here? You're following voice in that part, and a note here is felt
- 01:34:833 (x) - Add note for the same reason
- 01:37:333 (6) - For the vocal, it should be at 01:37:416 (Use Grid 2), for the hitsounds at 01:37:500 (6)
- 01:40:666 (1) - Make it start from 01:40:500 (1)
- 01:42:333 (1) - Move at 01:42:000 (1) -
- 01:51:333 (1) - Make it start from 01:51:166 (1) -
- 01:52:833 (x) - Add note for the dear
- 01:58:500 (x) - the "e"
- 00:03:833 (x) - Circle dat snap?
- 00:12:500 (x) - Since you're following 00:12:666 (1,2,3,4,5), why not adding a note here?
- 00:42:000 (2,3) - It's quite confusing, since it doesn't follow whay you were following before and interrupt abrupty the flow- move to 00:41:833 (2,3) ?
- 01:29:833 (2,1,1) - It's quite confusive...
- 00:21:666 (2) - Since the 00:20:666 (2,1) follow that snare(?) sound many could mistake this being in 00:21:500 (it does have that snare) and 00:21:833 (x) have the sound sound at an higher pitch(aka should be 2 grid higher than the last)
- 00:31:000 (2) - 1 grid up for the difference in pitch with last. Should have a better flow, since (1) ↑(2) ↓(3) ↑↑(4)
- 00:32:500 (4) - Same height as 00:32:167 (2) (same sound)
- 01:20:166 (x) - Add note at lower height
- 01:21:500 (2) - Make it start at 01:21:833 (2) to better follow voice - and add a note at 01:21:500 (1) if you want(make sure you make (2) one grid higher
- 01:29:833 (3,4,1,1) - Like this should feel quite better
Maniac → Technical Mixing
right?
Topic Starter
I went through and rechecked hard and maniac, found a few things to fix. The bookmarked areas in it are the only non-authentic parts, so I'm more likely to make changes there. Normal is completely non-authentic, so anything goes there. If something is indeed too hard, then I'll make changes, but I think I got all of it. Thanks for the mod. I wouldn't have rechecked it myself without it.HakuNoKaemi wrote:
[Hard]If I'll mod it considering it non-authentic, I'll do something like this, can I continue?
- 00:12:333 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - Following the pitch, is something like this
1st 3 notes are harp, last 4 are synth. Plus, I only have 4 y axes I can choose from. Also authentic.- 00:21:500 (x) - Add a normal note one line underr the last and
- 00:21:833 (x) - Add a normal note at y 288 ?
Did something different and followed bass- 00:31:333 (2) - +1 repeat (to make it end at the same sound of the start)
made it authentic. Somehow I missed this one, or it got changed in modding- 00:36:166 (x) - Expected note y 256 ?
authentic- 00:43:833 (1) - If it's following the ever~, it should end in the big white tick
I'm not sure why it ends on a blue tick like that, but it's authentic, and it's not noticeable to me. Maniac has this too- 00:59:333 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Blue Hold ?
there's actually a drum beat here with the sliderslide noise that I tried to get. Also authentic.- 01:04:000 (5) - "The-", one line higher than the last since is higher pitched
authentic- 01:09:500 (1,2,3,4) - Since 01:08:833 (5,6,7,8) - went up, this can went down?
I moved one note down at the end. Jump was 3.0 back down to 2.5.- 01:17:500 (1,2,3,4) - Since the jump are quite large, I suggest to do this
eww. This is far easier than the previous stream. The only time I'm going to stray from authentic notes is when I really need to due to difficulty, or it's just impossible to recreate in osu.- 01:23:833 (5,6,7) - Move the notes one line under for this (since the jump does not quite fit)
Okay, but it goes to the bottom instead of the top. Lol, it's the same distance either way. First 2 notes are the ewi, 3rd is a bass hit. Matched something I did later. http://puu.sh/17JiG- 01:26:500 (1) - e - ver~ stays better than a single hold
I'm actually never mapping lyrics in this.- 01:37:500 (x) - Add normal note here
I like it better without- 01:45:166 (1) - Instead, an hold that start from 01:45:000 (x) - ?
There's actually 2 notes here- 01:46:000 (4,1,2,1) - uhm, use a different pattern? it's not quite easy to intuit it
It's intuitive when you know what you're listening for. In any case, fixed SB for one of the holds- 01:51:166 (x) - Add a normal note for "I" ?
again, mapping the ewi here.
Upgrated the post and completed modding, I didn't find videos of the easier diff to confront, and pretty much said something for the authentic part too
But one thing. can I try mapping some kind of impossible guest?
But one thing. can I try mapping some kind of impossible guest?
Topic Starter
More changes. You are welcome to try to map something, but it's not at all easy. The other option would be to map something for airwave (my other osuka map which IMO is better than this one).HakuNoKaemi wrote:
[Easy](I couldn't find any lite mixing videos...)There are none. Hard and maniac are the only authentics[Normal]
- 01:10:166 (x) - Add note here? You're following voice in that part, and a note here is felt k
- 01:34:833 (x) - Add note for the same reason I don't actually know where "love" goes, but I suspect it's on a 1/2. I didn't feel the beat here
- 01:37:333 (6) - For the vocal, it should be at 01:37:416 (Use Grid 2), for the hitsounds at 01:37:500 (6) Actually all the lyrics are off a bit.
- 01:40:666 (1) - Make it start from 01:40:500 (1)
- 01:42:333 (1) - Move at 01:42:000 (1) -
- 01:51:333 (1) - Make it start from 01:51:166 (1) -
- 01:52:833 (x) - Add note for the dear I suppose switching back and forth from lyrics to ewi is a bit confusing, and it would probably help if I had more hitsounds available to make that more clear.
- 01:58:500 (x) - the "e"
[Hard]
- 00:03:833 (x) - Circle dat snap? It's not on hard
- 00:12:500 (x) - Since you're following 00:12:666 (1,2,3,4,5), why not adding a note here? because it's not obvious to me
- 00:42:000 (2,3) - It's quite confusing, since it doesn't follow whay you were following before and interrupt abrupty the flow- move to 00:41:833 (2,3) ? Changed the previous so it flows better. I do that pattern all the time in this
- 01:29:833 (2,1,1) - It's quite confusive... Did something different
[Maniac]
- 00:21:666 (2) - Since the 00:20:666 (2,1) follow that snare(?) sound many could mistake this being in 00:21:500 (it does have that snare) and 00:21:833 (x) have the sound sound at an higher pitch(aka should be 2 grid higher than the last) Unlikely anyone would mess that up, but changed the y axes to match the bass
Hard→Popular Mixing
- 00:31:000 (2) - 1 grid up for the difference in pitch with last. Should have a better flow, since (1) ↑(2) ↓(3) ↑↑(4)
- 00:32:500 (4) - Same height as 00:32:167 (2) (same sound) I'm coming to the conclusion that I can make anything fit here because there's just so much going on
- 01:20:166 (x) - Add note at lower height
- 01:21:500 (2) - Make it start at 01:21:833 (2) to better follow voice - and add a note at 01:21:500 (1) if you want(make sure you make (2) one grid higher no, not the voice! the ewi!
- 01:29:833 (3,4,1,1) - Like this should feel quite better
Maniac → Technical Mixing
right? Correct. I could probably rename the difficulties to that, but I also want to stick to osu standards