Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Other
  3. Off-Topic
  4. Forum Games
  5. Mafia

| | | | | | | | | MAFIA - The brink of day. 22 men and a god

posted
Total Posts
866
show more
NoHitter
osu! Alumni
3,785 posts
Joined June 2009
NoHitter
Because I don't buy your role claim.
It's one thing to be a Town Vig who can kill using game names. (See my earlier post on why I think this isn't even a town role.)
But it's another to be lynch and kill immune right AFTER you execute your kill.

If we DO lynch you and you die, you're either scum, indy or a horrible town layer.
If we DO lynch you and you don't die, you're telling the truth, and we can trust you somewhat.

The lead you gave us with your claim is currently, in my opinion, better than a possible regular lynch at this moment.

Of course if we get more info/something else happens that gives a better lead, then I'm willing to switch options.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
well your supposed opinions are horribly wrong

all me getting lynched and not dying would prove is that I have at least 1 shot lynchproof

you don't know whether or not I actually killed him, or anything else

no lynching is only viable when your numbers are smaller, day 1 no lynch is the worst move town could possibly make as it turns day 2 into an equally useless day
bmin11
5,438 posts
Joined October 2008
bmin11
I'm doubting there would be a one-shot lynchproof mafia and so does NoHItter I think. If you are really unlynchable, you would be close to confirmed town. However, I agree it isn't a wise move to do on D1. All we will be getting is a near-confirm townie with a possibility of having a lynchproof mafia.
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Dear god the pages

About Two;

I understand the consequences of a no lynch but Two's role is something I don't believe. Claiming to be completely unkillable (Or at least 1 shot unkillable) seems like a convenient excuse to never be lynched the whole game because, when you think about it, he can just keep using the same argument (Ie no lynch is bad, don't lynch me!) every day up to ly-lo. I also find it convenient that he completely latched himself onto the 'lynch will end the day' but that opinion will vary among everyone.

To be honest, I'd rather risk the "no lynch" now rather than later because 'we have a cushion of 22 players' because it's entirely possible he is lying.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old

Rantai wrote:

I understand the consequences of a no lynch but Two's role is something I don't believe. Claiming to be completely unkillable (Or at least 1 shot unkillable) seems like a convenient excuse to never be lynched the whole game because, when you think about it, he can just keep using the same argument (Ie no lynch is bad, don't lynch me!) every day up to ly-lo. I also find it convenient that he completely latched himself onto the 'lynch will end the day' but that opinion will vary among everyone.
first of all rantai we have 21 players left

second, I don't know what you mean by "latched himself onto the 'lynch will end the day"

wojjan confirmed that it does end the day, if you meant that

otherwise, I assumed from playing ladysuburu's games that unlynchable lynches don't end the day

finally, you're mafia
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Ok 21 players, but the point stands. It's better that we do it now rather than later where it would hurt more.

And yes I know, everyone against you is mafia.

Edit: English failure
bmin11
5,438 posts
Joined October 2008
bmin11
It's hard to imagine Two would try to excuse himself from being lynched by saying he's unlynchable, because he did not mind getting lynched when he claimed to be unlynchable. He turned around right after Wojjan said the day will end if we attempt to lynch an unlynchable. Nothing wrong here I think o_o
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
How I saw it was - it was a typical bid to make it look like we'd be wasting our time by lynching him. In the end I feel extremely wary of the claim itself, just doesn't sit right with me.

Also;

Two wrote:

well I assumed it wouldn't end the day

I don't care either way, ultimately
Was that meant to mean that even if it did end the day you didn't care...?
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
How I saw it was - it was a typical bid to make it look like we'd be wasting our time by lynching him, basically giving him a never lynch status which could bite us later if he isn't town.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old

Rantai wrote:

Two wrote:

well I assumed it wouldn't end the day

I don't care either way, ultimately
Was that meant to mean that even if it did end the day you didn't care...?
it was meant to mean I didn't care what was decided

the thing is, I don't have to make a "gambit" to get "never lynch status"

I have that as vanilla

the only thing I need is night kill protection, which I've already secured
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Mmk, that was confusing me a bit.

Still, I just can't believe an unlynchable vig, let alone a kill proof day vig.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
your role must suck then
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
It looks fine to me.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
then I find it hard to believe that you find it hard to believe that I am what I say I am
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
I find it hard to believe that you don't believe that I find it hard to believe that what you say is what you are.

In seriousness, I'm skeptical of the role because it just doesn't seem right. You could attribute it to the fact I've never seen a role like that before.
akrolsmir
606 posts
Joined November 2010
akrolsmir
wtf 15 pages in half a day

I believe Two is town mostly on the back of the fact that it was a daykill; that doesn't seem like a scum ability from a flavor or logical standpoint. That said, he's probably not telling the whole truth- for instance, about being lynchproof. I wouldn't be surprised if he's just pretending to be one shot and can actually kill again tomorrow.
pieguyn
2,020 posts
Joined May 2009
pieguyn
Oh wait, the mafia might have fakeclaims. If that's the case, that means there's no possible way Two could kill a mafia in the first place because their games wouldn't be correct.

Also, you can put anything as a scum ability (for example me and Lilac put a mafia voyeur who actually ended up revealing all the other mafia).

Obviously Two's role is correct because no one else counterclaimed (as far as the vigilante goes, I'm not sure about lynchproof/bulletproof), but I can't really understand how that role would be town in the first place.
bmin11
5,438 posts
Joined October 2008
bmin11
We could have multiple vigilante. Actually, if Wojjan just confirmed this day vig kill just like any other games, it would have been so much easier and convenient
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Salvage
two's role is correct to the point of being vig, that makes perfect sense at guessing roles .. i wouldn't be surprised if he is mafia wich i highly doubt but .. isn't this supposed to be like an awesome different game?.


with that said i don't consider it as an option right now, i don't even think he is lynchproof but lynching him it's useless right now, i'd really like to move on to figure the actual lynch, i'm sticking for adam cause he didn't post a real answer yet, so no forgiveness.



Luna is acting weird too, like trying to stay away from the thread and all-.


and all the lurkers why make it hard for town if you are town .. really.
adam2046
1,653 posts
Joined April 2008
adam2046
Just re-read the thread. Not a whole lot was actually said in 15 pages.
Only Salvage looks like scum to me right now...because it's Salvage.

As much as Two's roleclaim post seemed out of character to me (very), I wouldn't doubt that he'd kill swiftwolf no matter what allegiance either of them were just because he annoyed him. And I don't think there's any point testing his bulletproof claim since the mafia will target him tonight anyway.

Hey not posters. Post.
Yeah that's right, I can pretend to be town as well, Salvage.
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
Unless I'm mistaken, Swiftwolf had a 'lover'? Does that mean they will die at nightfall or am I on the wrong track with this?
pieguyn
2,020 posts
Joined May 2009
pieguyn
IIRC he was a Relay Mason. So, he was a mason, not a lover
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
Alright I don't even know what the means, I should read the game the role came from...
akrolsmir
606 posts
Joined November 2010
akrolsmir
Relevant mod (LS) note from Less Experimental Mafia.

Based on Wojjan's description of the role, though, I don't think it's the same here. Rather it seems to be more traditional masons in this game. It shouldn't matter too much given that there were only two masons anyways.
Ivalset
osu! Alumni
1,522 posts
Here since the beginning
Ivalset
Let's see:

1) I have doubts that Two is actually a vigilante, mainly due to him claiming he was responsible for the kill after it was made.

2) I don't think the person responsible for Swiftwolf's death is town-aligned. If the massclaim prevention measure is in place to punish massclaiming because it unfairly benefits town, then I would assume that a killing power that is based on knowledge of another player's role would be anti-town.

Vote: LadySuburu
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Salvage
^


why would the real vigilante not counterclaim?


why would two take the risk of a counterclaim if he wasn't even near of getting lynched? why would mafia NOT counterclaim vigilante and kind of confirm one of theirs? ..




also i'm not saying two is confirmed town at all, as i said before i wouldn't be surprised if there is a mafia vigilante or something like that, i'm saying that i think he in fact killed Swift, cause it's dumb not to counterclaim that.
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Salvage
oh i realize i said the same thing twice, sorry just woke up D:
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old
I want to lynch Lilac

he's not gonna be back till the 17th anyways

unvote vote Lilac
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
lilac is a good policy lynch but a bad lynch in general

if lilac is mafia we'd get more mafia votes on them than normal since they'd just resign themselves to the fact that they're unsavable

the point is having information to go off of day 2
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old
how is lynching someone active going to help anything but slow down the game

if he is mafia it's a good thing no matter what

who do you want to lynch though
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
we should kill the person who has contributed the next-least, which is ivalset

he's great if he's the last alive but never posts besides that
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
unless someone else has 0 posts that I didn't notice?
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old
ivalset posted once

animask hasn't I don't think

akrolsmir posted once?
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
I'm not picky, you decide

I just think our best bet day 1 is to kill a lurker
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old
well animask is basically dxs as far as activity goes town or mafia

akrolsmir is usually active when they're town though I don't remember them ever being mafia

and now they are inactive~

unvote vote akrolsmir

I would still prefer to lynch Lilac though since he's gonna be gone for so long but whatever

even if he has an aux ability it's not like he'll be able to use it
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old
ival/jinx/backfire/krzy/luna/mashley/lybydose/lilac/adam/animask/foulcoon


all the possible lynch candidates

either haven't posted at all or have contributed nothing while still posting sometimes to seem active

what do you guys think
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
I think give them at least another 24 hours. There might be some other reason for staying quiet and a few of them have said nothing at all.
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old

Rantai wrote:

I think give them at least another 24 hours. There might be some other reason for staying quiet and a few of them have said nothing at all.
it's easy to make up something to post when you realize lurkers are being gunned for

but what about the people on that list who did post but didn't contribute anyways

or did you just look at the people in your role pm
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
I just looked at my role pm, it had my name on it.

I speak on behalf of previous games I've played where I've gone on and found that I couldn't post much, except for a few small opinions without repeating what everyone else was saying. The main problem for me though was the thread only moved when I was asleep/at uni so by the time I came back to say something anything relevant was already discussed.

In simple terms I am just more lenient about early game activity because I have had the same problems. Whether you find it acceptable or not is another issue but that is how I feel about it.
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old
who would you want to have lynched then

out of curiosity
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
As much as you will probably disagree, Two. Just because I find it hard to believe the whole roleclaim.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old

Rantai wrote:

I think give them at least another 24 hours. There might be some other reason for staying quiet and a few of them have said nothing at all.
that defeats the purpose

the idea is that mafia will lay low day 1 since there is the highest risk of aux backlash and overall suspicion against them from posting
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
oh and unvote, vote akrolsmir
Jinxy
2,777 posts
Joined February 2009
Jinxy
I don't have an excuse, other than my brain just decided to be half-assed today after seeing 13 pages appear while I was asleep, so I can't find anything overly suspicious other than Hitter wanting to confirm Two with a day-ending lynch.

LS's posts about softclaiming were odd, since he never said HOW exactly it was supposed to benefit town and how he could tell a falseclaim, I guess.
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Salvage
i'd go with Backfire from all those, but akrol it's good too i guess
Jinxy
2,777 posts
Joined February 2009
Jinxy
Wait, when does Day end?
Backfire
3,208 posts
Joined February 2010
Backfire
Im at least trying to keep up, salvage. Im not trying to be suspicious, I just dont want to be falsely accused of being mafia.
0_o
2,155 posts
Joined December 2008
0_o
Sorry, I've been busy this weekend. Will post my thoughts tonight.
Salvage
590 posts
Joined January 2010
Salvage

Backfire wrote:

Im at least trying to keep up, salvage. Im not trying to be suspicious, I just dont want to be falsely accused of being mafia.


glad to hear that



vote : akrolsmir



currently 4 votes con akro i think.
Sleep Powder
1,540 posts
Joined October 2008
Sleep Powder
If Two is lynch-proof he is probably aligned with town. I thought I heard someone say there isn't a vig in the Werewolf Mafia... anyways
its a 1-shot vig, but a lynch-proof modifier seems kind of unbalanced for that "role". There may be some bad roles mixed in with the good.

I actually agree with NoHiTter. His claims are pretty outrageous and should be tested with a lynch. Rantai also considered his role to be
fake. bmin11 posts about having multiple vigs... I think I'll place a FoS here for now. Reason? I guess its a gut feeling. I'm thinking that multiple vigs are unlikely even in games with 20+ people. Not really sure, so not really suspicious.

@adam, the mafia might not bother if he is a 1-shot vig, but they would rather kill Two if he was onto any mafia members.

Hmm, people are voting for akro? *reads akro's posts and posts about him*

We're voting for inactive people now? Is this the part where all the townies bandwagon on people to find out who the mafia could be?
I actually agree to this sort of thing so...

unvote, Vote: akrolsmir

Who I actually think is suspicious? Unsure.
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna
I don't believe Two's full claim. Vig part, okay. Lynch- and bulletproof? Nope. At the very least not permanent. That would be pretty imbalanced since the only way he could be eliminated would be a faction that bypasses bulletproof (SK?). Sure it had the downside of killing him if he listed the wrong game, but Wojjan would have known that it'd be pretty easy to get at least one confirmable softclaim (Swift's behavior with the hinting and everything made it pretty obvious to me that his claim was true). It's just way too much reward for too little risk.
mod: Does this game treat bulletproof status as NK-proof (possibly daykillproof assuming a second dayvig of some kind) or does it literally only mean protection from bullets and different kill-flavors still take effect?
Now, I'm just thinking about what roles Two could possibly have that would allow him to convincingly fakclaim something this strong.
For now I'll just accept that he is probably at least 1-shot lynchproof, risking the lynch by proposing it himself might be a bit too much of a gambit when it was not yet confirmed that a lynchproof-lynch would end the day. Then again, if he is Mafia he might have asked Wojjan via PM/QT before he posted and just waited until someone asked for clarification (this would make pieguy who asked a possible scumbuddy).
The easiest way to fake bulletproof would of course be if he was scum and had some kind of scum-aligned doc or jailkeeper to protect him from possible SK/Town Vigs.
If he is indeed town, I don't see a reasonable way for him to fake both of these attributes at the same time, considering that he already claimed his dayvig ability and would need external help from other PRs to survive. The possibilities here would be that he gained 1-shot or 1-night versions of his claims (still really strong) or that he is pulling a similar gambit to Touhou PyP where he claimed to be NK-proof in order to pull all auxes of him. This would not be quite as strong though, because Wojjan already announced that anti-massclaim measures are in place so we wouldn't be able to analyze the information to the same degree.

This is confusing, after the whole Cultafia-ability stuff I don't even know what to expect in these forums anymore haha
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
I'm actually permanently lynchproof. I promise that no one will ever lynch me.

As for bulletproof, why not try your luck tonight, Luna?
KRZY
Former osu! Champion: OWC#3
4,850 posts
Joined May 2009
KRZY

Two wrote:

krzy I can't understand what you are saying
I am accusing you of faking your vig/lynchproof claim because you know this crowd will not go for a Two lynch. Can't back this up other than saying that's what I make of the whole situation.

Also, does the day have a deadline?
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna
I like how everyone who lists you as possible mafia is scum
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
krzy please explain why I would fake that when the crowd would have never lynched me to begin with
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
Luna, that's because this is a game about lying. Just because I say someone is mafia doesn't mean I actually think that. You don't fall under that category though. You really are.
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna
If you think so
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
what I think matters more than you think

I can kill you tomorrow if I feel like it
KRZY
Former osu! Champion: OWC#3
4,850 posts
Joined May 2009
KRZY

Two wrote:

krzy please explain why I would fake that when the crowd would have never lynched me to begin with
Works like a dare. "I'm lynchproof, I dare you to lynch me." Makes people reluctant to lynch you, like we're seeing right now.

Also I've never seen a dayvig in the 5-ish Mafia games I played so I don't know what to make of that.
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna

Two wrote:

what I think matters more than you think

I can kill you tomorrow if I feel like it
If I were scum I'd most likely have fakeclaimed my game.
You are sure that you could kill me? Well, how are you so sure that I didn't fakeclaim? Are you scum and know I'm town?
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
it doesn't matter what you claimed
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna

Two wrote:

it doesn't matter what you claimed
So now you are killproof with unlimited daykills?
Likely
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
it actually is likely, since I'm not town aligned

I'm a lynchproof bulletproof day serial killer

the reason I'm claiming this is because I'd like to work with the town

I actually don't die if I get the game wrong, I get exposed as a serial killer and lose lynchproof for that day

what I offer is an extra lynch in exchange for good information and protection from lynches
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Now that is believable.

Whatever good enough for me right now.
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna
Since we can't win with a SK alive, I guess you already know that we will have to lynch you as soon as you miss a gameclaim. Otherwise it'd be game over for us because you'd be unkillable.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
wrong, you don't have to lynch me at that point

you have to lynch me sometime before the end, but the point of me claiming now is to not be lynched when I miss

I am essentially a vigilante with unlimited kills

I don't think a town member would want to waste that, but you aren't town are you Luna
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai

Two wrote:

wrong, you don't have to lynch me at that point

you have to lynch me sometime before the end, but the point of me claiming now is to not be lynched when I miss
Problem that I see is that you can just refuse to shoot. Then we will never be able to lynch you. Unless I missed something
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
I am not inherently lynchproof

I have to kill someone, I just worded it oddly
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna
Are you forced to kill someone every single day? If so, okay.
Otherwise there's no way you'd miss more than one gameclaim and let yourself get lynched. You are cleverer than that.
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna
ninja'd with an exlanation.
In that case okay
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old
pretty sure I told everybody not to soft claim from the beginning
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
unless someone else has another plan, I will attempt to kill the people who claimed

if I get a game wrong, I think that would be a guilty result, right?
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
I'd find the whole disregarding the win condition thing insane if it was anyone but Two. But it is Two. I was about to ask if you had a choice in killing but obviously you answered that before me.
The whole plan feels sooo cheaty but I guess if he really is on our side it gives us an enormous advantage. I'm wary of it though, of course.
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
Good catch.

We have 7 claims. That's 7 potential days he can simply shoot them from the start of the day and not die. Actually I bet his role is one of the damn countermeasures.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
well wojjan specifically said mafia when referring to claims, and I'm not mafia

they either simply have fake claims or have something else entirely
NoHitter
osu! Alumni
3,785 posts
Joined June 2009
NoHitter
Wow Two, that explains a lot. (I just knew it.)

So I guess Two's off the chopping block for now.
Rereading the latest pages.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
I never was on the chopping block rofl
Rantai
1,000 posts
Joined July 2010
Rantai
You were this close to getting at least 1 vote though, from me.

Nonetheless you're already lynch proof today so I don't see a point in doing so but I so want to get rid of you as soon as possible. With those 7 claims and the fact I trust you right now as much as my sock to save me from drowning (yeah ok wtf at the comparison), who knows when you're just going to take your free kills and laugh at us while being unkillable.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
I can just as easily work for mafia as I can town. If you don't agree to my terms, that's fine.
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna
Two, please clarify your role.
You told me you'd be able to kill me even without my gameclaim.
Now you are saying that as attempted kill will fail if the claim was wrong ("if I get a game wrong, I think that would be a guilty result, right?")

What is it?
We need to know exactly before we can agree to anything.
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old
I just can't help but smile at how amazingly right I was 8-)

but um, I guess our lynches for the next 6 days are gonna be people who haven't claimed

starting with the inactives I guess~

if anyone lied and doesn't die we lynch them that day though
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
it's what I said on the next page

that was me bluffing
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna
If you target the claimed people in the order that town decides, I guess that's alright.
If you ever kill someone else we'll just have to instantly lynch you.
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley

Luna wrote:

If you ever kill someone else we'll just have to instantly lynch you.
Except we can't
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
if I kill someone else you can't instantly lynch me

plus I assume you mean the order chosen wouldn't have any involvement from you, since you're not town
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old

Mashley wrote:

Luna wrote:

If you ever kill someone else we'll just have to instantly lynch you.
Except we can't
mafia don't have to read mashley

duh

also I vote Luna/LS as first two

in either order idc
Luna
2,354 posts
Joined November 2010
Luna
By instantly I meant "as soon as possible"
akrolsmir
606 posts
Joined November 2010
akrolsmir
It's been 24 hours and you guys are already looking to string someone up for inactivity?

Also it's amazing how little it took you guys 20 pages to say. All that's really changed is Two's claim that he's a SK rather than a vig. I still think he's town and just making up parts of his role as he likes to do so much, but he probably has some plan cooked up.
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
if you really think that's all there is to comment on, I'm glad we are lynching you
Wojjan
806 posts
Joined August 2008
Topic Starter
Wojjan

Luna wrote:

mod: Does this game treat bulletproof status as NK-proof (possibly daykillproof assuming a second dayvig of some kind) or does it literally only mean protection from bullets and different kill-flavors still take effect?
A bulletproof vest by my hand tailors in a way that it stops all kill attempts, regardless of flavor.
Chris_old
0 posts
Joined February 2008
Chris_old
mashley you lurk so much and hardly post :(
Mashley
2,042 posts
Joined September 2008
Mashley
99% of the time I've left it open in a tab and forgot about it I guess, I usually have tons of tabs open at any time. It's just how I roll bitchessss.
KRZY
Former osu! Champion: OWC#3
4,850 posts
Joined May 2009
KRZY
Would you be so kind as to share with us your win condition Two?
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
my win condition is the same as a survivor
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
your turn
KRZY
Former osu! Champion: OWC#3
4,850 posts
Joined May 2009
KRZY
That means you have to control half the votes during the day?
KRZY
Former osu! Champion: OWC#3
4,850 posts
Joined May 2009
KRZY
I'm just trying to confirm if Town can win with Two standing
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
I don't know? I guess
Two_old
620 posts
Joined March 2008
Two_old
I just checked and yeah it's half the votes
KRZY
Former osu! Champion: OWC#3
4,850 posts
Joined May 2009
KRZY
ok, thank you
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
198 / 866