00:37:782 (3,4) - this slow down is too suddenly , don't do this , even some people can read it by sliderticks strange thing about this, it is actually a part where the music gave an "aaaaaaaaaaaa" feeling the make the part absolutely slower. So, won't change nothing
00:38:907 - vol 0% is unrankble , make it 5%
00:52:849 (1,2,3,4,5) - if me , I'll do like this http://puu.sh/4SYA
00:55:662 (1,2,3,4,5) - uh.. this rhyme , not follow vocal or drums , sound odd here it's nothing like "odd" as it follow drum and pass by vocals and it is an similiar thing to the one you did in the 00:52:849 (1,2,3,4,5) -
01:07:755 - why vol 0% here , 70 is better imo 80%, (i deel there was a spinner there .... )
02:00:620 (1,2) - stack better plz
02:15:432 - why vol 0%
02:28:370 (2,3) - confusing spacing here
03:35:017 - vol..

wcx19911123 wrote:

[General]
please use custom combo color I am. It's in skin.ini.

[Easy]
this diff follow the vocal too much.. kinda hard too read for newbies , imo
this make the rhyme kinda strange , I don't like this
if you want a sample that to show what rhyme I like , please pm me I'm actually not following the lyrics much and just mapping to the beat and avoiding offbeat/upbeat stuff if I can. It makes perfect sense to me, and playing this even after a long time of not playing it I'm still happy with the result. I may ask for your rhythm example down the road if others feel the same
and the hitsounds is boring , use some volume-down normal-hitnormal is better imo I'll fiddle with it.

[Insane]
a good jump diff is not jump at where you like. it is jump with the song. Every jump I put in was where I would have put a jump in ddr. I'm not a fan of jumpstreams but rather putting in jumps whenever I feel like a jump is in the song, and almost always on a note with emphasis.
01:41:030 (1,2,3,4) - this , 1,2,3 is same spacing but 4 is not , this makes player click 4 ealier it doesn't make sense to hit the note on 01:41:592 in the music, and I'm presuming 00:33:470 (1,2,3,4) wasn't a problem for you or you would have pointed that one out instead. Also 02:48:620 (1,2,3,4).

I think this map need more work
anyway , good luck

Behonkiss wrote:

All difficulties:
- 02:54:995: Is there a point to the slower timing points here when you left the whole part empty? There IS a spinner on Hard, but it ends at the timing point where you go back to the normal BPM anyway, so it seems pointless. BPM slows down here, which is why I didn't map anything, but to keep the metronome correct on the song select screen and such I put them in. I also suspect this is why nobody ever mapped this song seriously.

Easy:
- The slider moves a bit fast for an Easy difficulty. In fact, it's at the same speed as Hard. Haku likes slow sliders. Also 1.0 at 160 BPM is nowhere near fast.
- Seems weird that there aren't any claps until 33 seconds in. I put claps in the buildup to kiai and at end of kiai. I might end up putting in some soft hitnormals instead of claps, but I don't really want to barcode either. I'll experiment.

1. inconsistent red line: 00:41:030(yours)/00:41:037(Haku), actually, there's a spinner from 39,001 to 41,040 at haku's diff which means the spinner end is also unsnapped, snap it to 41,030 if you fix the red line to that point
2. haku's diff lack some tags, also you should credit him in tags
3. i hope you lower the volume during 02:27~02:39 a bit

1. 00:47:030 (3,1) - new combo on (3) instead of (1)?
2. 00:54:342 (4,1) - even though there're bass...i don't like red tick claps, use whistle instead?
3. 01:03:342 (1,2) - the most impressive part of the music itself is the 1/3, just use a 2-beat repeat slider from 01:03:530 to 01:05:030? same to 02:11:307 (1) and 03:30:517 (3,4) -
4. 01:07:280 (1) - ..i don't know if ending a KIAI during a spinner is a good idea, and actually just do a slider from 01:07:280 to 01:08:030 fits more imo
5. 02:05:870 (2) - remove clap at start
6. 02:14:870 (1) - snap KIAI line to spinner end
7. 03:34:830 (1) - ^

1. there're some 1/4 triplets in your KIAI, i suggest seperate the spacing from 1/2 to 1/4 (for example 1.0x DS for all and 0.7x DS for 1/4 triplets), it looks crowded for me
2. 02:01:557 (3) - use 1/2 repeat slider instead? feel lack a cymbal
3. 02:14:870 (3) - unsnapped KIAI end

1. the claps in KIAI feel weird..why don't clap throughout the KIAI?
2. snap the KIAI line end as mentioned in [Easy]
3. i have same issue to triplet layout as [Haku's Hard], how about stacking all your 1/4s?
4. 02:03:995 (4,5,6,7) - i don't really think this kind of jump make sense, use other kind of jump?
5. some places in the last KIAI feel "suddenly become so jumpy" to me..
6. the last spinner has extra length compared to other diff, make it the same?

loveFantasy wrote:

hi hi~

[General]

1. inconsistent red line: 00:41:030(yours)/00:41:037(Haku), actually, there's a spinner from 39,001 to 41,040 at haku's diff which means the spinner end is also unsnapped, snap it to 41,030 if you fix the red line to that point
2. haku's diff lack some tags, also you should credit him in tags I suppose I ought to fix this stuff, but I was waiting more on haku to finish hitsounds.
3. i hope you lower the volume during 02:27~02:39 a bit Wasn't planning on it. Sounds like the dynamics are mf the whole way through to me.

[Easy]

1. 00:47:030 (3,1) - new combo on (3) instead of (1)? why not
2. 00:54:342 (4,1) - even though there're bass...i don't like red tick claps, use whistle instead? clap=snare. Might change to hitnormal
3. 01:03:342 (1,2) - the most impressive part of the music itself is the 1/3, just use a 2-beat repeat slider from 01:03:530 to 01:05:030? same to 02:11:307 (1) and 03:30:517 (3,4) - I don't understand what's in 1/3, or how it's impressive.
4. 01:07:280 (1) - ..i don't know if ending a KIAI during a spinner is a good idea, and actually just do a slider from 01:07:280 to 01:08:030 fits more imo I like spinners, and having the the stars disappear is what I want. Plus I'd rather end kiai on a downbeat.
5. 02:05:870 (2) - remove clap at start
6. 02:14:870 (1) - snap KIAI line to spinner end
7. 03:34:830 (1) - ^

[Insane]

1. the claps in KIAI feel weird..why don't clap throughout the KIAI? I'll consider it.
2. snap the KIAI line end as mentioned in [Easy]
3. i have same issue to triplet layout as [Haku's Hard], how about stacking all your 1/4s? Just a note: 1/4 is triples. 1/3 and 1/6 are triplets. Triplets usually come in groups of 4, triples come in groups of 3. And I essentially did stack some of them, just didn't let osu do the stacking for me (I really do hate how osu stacks). This isn't a streamy map so I don't think compressed streams are needed.
4. 02:03:995 (4,5,6,7) - i don't really think this kind of jump make sense, use other kind of jump? then this kind of jump will never make sense
5. some places in the last KIAI feel "suddenly become so jumpy" to me.. It's true I put extra jumps in last kiai. I'll make it more consistent
6. the last spinner has extra length compared to other diff, make it the same? IKU holds it out twice as long

map is quite good, have a star

ziin wrote:

[*] 01:03:342 (1,2) - the most impressive part of the music itself is the 1/3, just use a 2-beat repeat slider from 01:03:530 to 01:05:030? same to 02:11:307 (1) and 03:30:517 (3,4) - I don't understand what's in 1/3, or how it's impressive.

- The slider moves a bit fast for an Easy difficulty. In fact, it's at the same speed as Hard.

[Haku's Hard]
00:44:662 (4) - as correct as it may be to the lyrics, it sounds better to be on the 1/2 snap, not 1/6. This section is probably a little early too, I'm going to have to fiddle around with the the timing sections some.

Haku's Hard:
- In desperate need of hitsounds besides just some finishes on spinners.
- 00:52:849 to 00:56:974 doesn't feel like it matches either the lyrics or the beat well.

[Haku's Hard]
there're some 1/4 triplets in your KIAI, i suggest seperate the spacing from 1/2 to 1/4 (for example 1.0x DS for all and 0.7x DS for 1/4 triplets), it looks crowded for me You didn't actually get the quite feeling i wanted to give at the map. As you see i'm using many SVs try to follow the pace of the song
02:01:557 (3) - use 1/2 repeat slider instead? feel lack a cymbal no cymbal on the red line.. it's actually a bass drum and i didn't map so much on those
02:14:870 (3) - unsnapped KIAI end

karenying wrote:

General
Your mp3 is 320kbps. it's not
Insane
01:41:780 (4) - new combo here?since there is a Jump of (1,2,3).It is confusing if you don't use new combo of (4) Or I could move it somewhere else, because nobody notices the other 2 times I did this. I fail to see how a new combo makes this easier.

[haku's hard]
I'm fine with 4 unique slider speeds. They fit, and nobody cares.
00:54:905 (6) - I think that behonkiss was referring to this note

I think it sounds better 1/2 later. Also you shouldn't map when a note ends with a circle. That's just silly. Use a spinner or slider if you're going to do that.

[haku's hard]
02:28:932 (3) - did you mean to do this anti-jump?
Also I've noticed for a while but haven't bothered to fix the volume on your spinners during the ritardandos.

1. I am usually against EHI mapsets but I guess this can pass, because insane is actually another hard, atleast it felt like that, if you look the other way on some jumps.
2. Timings felt funky. I guess we fixed that lol. If I remember correctly, we agreed on all these except for the 2nd one I think, where mine was 2ms later than yours or something.
   
   SPOILER

   [TimingPoints]
   464,375,4,2,0,80,1,0
   38513,-100,4,2,0,5,0,0
   39826,384.615384615385,4,2,0,5,1,0
   40206,402.684563758389,4,2,0,80,1,0
   40606,428.571428571429,4,2,0,80,1,0
   41040,375,4,2,0,100,1,1
   67765,-100,4,2,0,5,0,1
   68040,-100,4,2,0,5,0,0
   69922,-100,4,2,0,80,0,0
   106109,-100,4,2,0,5,0,0
   107422,384.615384615385,4,2,0,5,1,0
   107826,402.684563758389,4,2,0,80,1,0
   108222,428.571428571429,4,2,0,80,1,0
   108620,375,4,2,0,100,1,1
   135411,-100,4,2,0,5,0,1
   135620,-100,4,2,0,5,0,0
   137474,-100,4,2,0,80,0,0
   173682,-100,4,2,0,5,0,0
   174995,384.615384615385,4,2,0,5,1,0
   175385,402.684563758389,4,2,0,80,1,0
   175785,428.571428571429,4,2,0,80,1,0
   176206,375,4,2,0,80,1,0
   188018,-150,4,2,0,100,0,1
   188581,-100,4,2,0,100,0,1
   215018,-100,4,2,0,5,0,1
   215206,-100,4,2,0,5,0,0

1. Didn't really feel like an insane, difficulty settings were spot on, but it played more like a hard (if you don't look at some of the spacings). Up to you if you rename or not, doesn't really matter anyway.
2. 00:33:470 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This pattern got me the first time. Only the first time though, but I still felt it was slightly awkward. What I suggest here is that you reduce the spacing of 1-2-3 a little (you could make circle 2 go down a little so they aren't lined up, this would give an illusion that they are closer than they actually are, and the note 4 could be moved slightly down as well, about 1.5-1.6x snap from note 3, would be enough imo). You should use a new combo on 5 though, simply because of different spacing and swapping to the 2nd singer (follows the music better). Something like this comes to mind.
3. 00:36:657 (5) - I would prefer this note as a slider which would end at 00:37:220, because the voice stays and currently it feels a little empty. This is a suggestion only though, just make sure it's closer to the other pattern (or move the other pattern as it's only a few notes and then a spinner).
4. 00:56:405 (4,5,6,7) - I think you should reduce this spacing a little. Wasn't exceptionally hard but it stands out compared to all other patterns, you have nice low spacing and then suddenly 2.75x jumps. Breaks the flow imo. (also, later on with a similar pattern, you had lower spacing as well)
5. 01:07:842 - Map a triplet here? Since you started to follow the piano with this combo, and added in the voice, it would sound nice so it ends with the piano as well (while the spinner would still somehow follow the voice after them, and even the piano). Up to you though.
6. 01:41:780 (4) - This could be hard to notice that this one is 1/1 apart from the others. The pattern is similar to the one at the start (33:470) and I don't have any good ideas how to fix this, other than break the pattern and the one after entirely. :/
7. 01:42:155 (5) - New combo.
8. 02:03:995 (4,5,6,7,8) - These felt bad. It looks nice, but plays terrible. It's kinda expected to have 6 and 7 that fast (considering the timeline I mean) but this 8 required to watch the approach circles carefully. Usually, for me, when I have to heavily rely on approach circles to play a map, I think it plays bad. Try something like this. In this picture, you see how the red combo got slightly relocated (a more outside curve) which made the orange combo start more to the top. Using 1.0x snap, I placed 4 and 5, and then using 1.8x snap I placed 6 and 7. Might not be the most beautiful solution, but this played much better to me. Also, the highlighted note is the circle 8 (which is placed really nicely before the circle 1 in the previous combo, if you care about editor prettiness), also using 1.8x snap and has 2.95x distance towards circle 9, which is acceptable if you look at the pattern at 00:56:405 (which also had ~3.0x spacing for notes in this position).
9. 02:10:370 (2,3) - This spacing was readable but it felt kinda weird. Could think of something with the slider 3, blanketing it over the slider 2 instead of the note 4 (which almost touches the slider, nothing really bad about it though). Breaks your current pattern but looks less weird and I'm sure you can think of something good for the remaining notes.
10. 02:15:432 - Same thing about a triplet to follow the melody, etc.
11. 02:28:932 (2,3,4,5,6) - Inconsistent spacing in the combo. I see you tried to make a pattern, and that's perfectly fine, but you can have the constant spacing without making this look weird if you just move the slider 3 a bit further away from 2. Something like this maybe, or if you have something else in mind. The only thing I didn't like about this is the 2.0x spacing in this calm section, plays alright though, so nothing that bad.
12. 02:32:495 (5) - Maybe make this slider like this? Looks and plays better to me, only a suggestion.
13. 02:36:432 (8,9,1) - Would be better if you make this spacing a bit more consistent, could probably unstack 8 as well and use same spacing as 3,4,5,6 in the orange combo.
14. 02:43:557 (5) - New combo here instead of 02:44:120 (1) ? New vocal line and fits with the spacing change.
15. 02:48:620 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same as 00:33:470 pretty much (obviously doesn't have to be the same, just new combo on 5 and try to figure out some better spacing if you can).
16. 02:52:557 (6) - New combo. Spacing change and would follow the new vocal line nicely and make it less confusing.
17. 02:57:892 (5) - I would advise a new combo here as well, since you swapped from the voice to the melody (without it the combo looks slightly empty if you consider there are vocals at 02:58:830).
18. 02:59:205 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think the spacing here is too high and too inconsistent. The spacing between 1 and 2 is more or less okay (but I would prefer that it's less, because of the note 3 which has pretty much the same spacing as those 2 sliders but it's not a 1/2, but a 1/1) , but the spacing between 03:00:892 (5,6) is just too much. Almost a 5.0x jump out of nowhere and after it a 0.63x antijump. I suggest you redo the whole pattern because polishing this one could lose the meaning you probably wanted to show us here.
19. 03:23:204 (8) - New combo.
20. 03:23:767 (9,10) - ctrl+r one of these, I'd go for 10. Makes some inconsistency in spacing but looks and plays better (imo).
21. 03:26:767 (2,3) - Should probably reduce spacing to no more than 2.0, because you used it before like that (although I can understand that you want to make the last chorus more epic, but this spacing doesn't really make it epic, it's just annoying if you miss the note).
22. 03:35:017 - Maybe map a triplet here? Just like the other suggestions. This one would fit even better because the spinner ends where piano plays again.

1. I understand that this is a guest diff, but I find little sense to have smaller circles here compared to the insane. The score isn't far off either, and in general the map felt too cramped, too low spacing. I guess increasing spacing would lead to a remap, so up to you, just my comments. I strongly suggest to increase the circle size though (and fix some stuff so it fits the new circle size). Also if possible, a score reduction would be great as well, feels lame to have 1m which jumps into 7.3m which goes into 8.4m. Bad spread.
2. Spinners: They become loud during the spin, that is kinda awkward. If possible make it the same volume during the whole spin, or make it an incrementing volume.
3. 00:18:470 (1) - This slider was really weird, considering there is nothing in the music where it repeats. Since you didn't make up your own rhythms anywhere else, you should just follow the music here. Something like this, atleast timeline-wise.
4. 01:02:405 (4) - New combo. You are mapping the melody here completely, so it would fit.
5. 01:45:530 (6) - I didn't like this slowdown at all because it doesn't fit. It would fit if you follow the voice precisely, but you didn't, which made it quite awkward.
6. 02:52:557 (8,9) - I can't figure these out, they sound really bad to me. Breaks the flow completely since the slowed slider isn't following the voice explicitly. Also the double repeater didn't make much sense since where it ends the slow slider should start if you wanted to follow the voice. Since you already silenced the long slider, you can't really say it's following the percussion either. You should think of something else for these entirely, preferably something which follows the voice nicely.
7. 03:35:017 (4) - I wonder why is there no new combo here (you used it at 01:07:842 (1)). You should either make it a new combo, or remove the new combo from 01:07:842 (1) (because at the end of 2nd kiai you can't place a new combo due to a slider end).

1. AR3(or 4, 3 felt good enough), OD2. Probably bigger circle size as well, but this could lead to a remap of certain parts. Or, to save time and effort, just rename it to normal. You could add additional notes throughout the map to make it slightly harder (but still relatively easy) though. If you decide to keep it as easy, just reduce ar by 1 or 2 and od by 1.
2. -

464,375,4,2,0,80,1,0
39839,384.615384615385,4,2,0,5,1,0
40223,400,4,2,0,5,1,0
40623,416.666666666667,4,2,0,5,1,0
41040,375,4,2,0,100,1,1
107415,384.615384615385,4,2,0,5,1,0
107799,400,4,2,0,5,1,0
108199,416.666666666667,4,2,0,5,1,0
108620,375,4,2,0,100,1,1
174995,384.615384615385,4,2,0,5,1,0
175379,400,4,2,0,5,1,0
175779,416.666666666667,4,2,0,5,1,0
176206,375,4,2,0,80,1,0

lolcubes wrote:

[Haku's Hard]:

1. I understand that this is a guest diff, but I find little sense to have smaller circles here compared to the insane. The score isn't far off either, and in general the map felt too cramped, too low spacing. I guess increasing spacing would lead to a remap, so up to you, just my comments. I strongly suggest to increase the circle size though (and fix some stuff so it fits the new circle size). Also if possible, a score reduction would be great as well, feels lame to have 1m which jumps into 7.3m which goes into 8.4m. Bad spread.
   as now Insane is 8,6, my is 7,28 (just 7,3) so i do think it's not bad. as Going for too much higher score for an Insane in that song could mean 100% overmapping. Too i just think it would feel akward to play an Hard map that isn't that hard.... Plus, i use spacing and SV according to how I feel the map is and to the difficulty of the map. so a Slow map can actually benefit from a slow velocity.
   Too you should see the actual fact i spaced according to the part. a more fast paced part got a more larger spacing. Too i do hate just following others criteria, it WON'T even feel i mapped it. I too hate "the diff is boring because of low spacing" just try to know why I used that spacing first
   
2. Spinners: They become loud during the spin, that is kinda awkward. If possible make it the same volume during the whole spin, or make it an incrementing volume.
   
   just copied ziin's timing point's... so i arleady did it
   Actually I didn't know spinnerspin volume could be lowered till some days ago
   
3. 00:18:470 (1) - This slider was really weird, considering there is nothing in the music where it repeats. Since you didn't make up your own rhythms anywhere else, you should just follow the music here. Something like this, atleast timeline-wise.
   did some other thing?
4. 01:02:405 (4) - New combo. You are mapping the melody here completely, so it would fit.
5. 01:45:530 (6) - I didn't like this slowdown at all because it doesn't fit. It would fit if you follow the voice precisely, but you didn't, which made it quite awkward. Perfectly a reverse of what you say to some other parts. I followed Instruments with Voices too.
   
6. 02:52:557 (8,9) - I can't figure these out, they sound really bad to me. Breaks the flow completely since the slowed slider isn't following the voice explicitly. Also the double repeater didn't make much sense since where it ends the slow slider should start if you wanted to follow the voice. Since you already silenced the long slider, you can't really say it's following the percussion either. You should think of something else for these entirely, preferably something which follows the voice nicely.
   You don't know Jack... Frost, seriously. Actually *the voice is on a 1/6* *start singing*. and the percussion is actually more time after
   Folowing the percussions or the voice would either make it feels strange for some motives.
   
7. 03:35:017 (4) - I wonder why is there no new combo here (you used it at 01:07:842 (1)). You should either make it a new combo, or remove the new combo from 01:07:842 (1) (because at the end of 2nd kiai you can't place a new combo due to a slider end).

?.? Fixed in a completely different way

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

lolcubes wrote:

[Haku's Hard]:

1. 02:52:557 (8,9) - I can't figure these out, they sound really bad to me. Breaks the flow completely since the slowed slider isn't following the voice explicitly. Also the double repeater didn't make much sense since where it ends the slow slider should start if you wanted to follow the voice. Since you already silenced the long slider, you can't really say it's following the percussion either. You should think of something else for these entirely, preferably something which follows the voice nicely.
   You don't know Jack... Frost, seriously. Actually *the voice is on a 1/6* *start singing*. and the percussion is actually more time after
   Folowing the percussions or the voice would either make it feels strange for some motives.

xykbear wrote:

Request from my Queue~
Here is Aoi's Mod

ｷｬ━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━!!

[General]
`May be you should reduce the size of your SB image.the best size is 640x480 They are under the 800x600 limit, never scaled, and I use the full size when panning. It looks bad enough at 640x480, it would look even worse if I zoomed in. Also each background is maybe 100 kb, which is about the same as 2 bad pngs in a taiko/normal map.

[Easy]
00:16:964 (2) - the third slider node 2 grid up sorta
00:18:464 (1) - replace whistle by finish
00:28:589() - add a circle
00:30:464 (3) - remove finish
00:31:214 (1) - add finish at the start of slider
00:34:964 (3,2) - ^ IDK how I missed (2). I'm only putting finishes where they match the music. I guess because I didn't put a note here on insane.
00:41:040 (1) - first node is not on the grid Don't know how that happened
00:46:290 (2) - remove finish and add whistle
00:53:040 (3) - remove finish at the start of slider
01:26:040 (1) - add finish at the start of slider and move second slider node 2 grid right moved 1
01:36:540 (3) - finish
01:48:620 (1) - same question with 00:41:040 (1)
01:53:870 (3) - same with 00:46:290 (2)
02:44:120 (4) - add finish at the start of slider
02:56:206 (1,2) - these two slider is too close,and the reverse of (2) is blocked.make them loosely spacing is right, I suppose they don't need to be doubly symmetrical.
03:00:518 (5) - second slider node 1 grid left k

[Insane]
00:18:464 (1) - add finish at the start of slider
00:45:727 (5) - remove finish at the end of slider
01:26:040 (1) - add finish at the start of slider
01:53:307 (5) - remove finish at the end of slider
02:04:370 (6,7) - a unreasonable jump.may be can put as a square with (4,5) I get it every time
03:02:206 (1) - finish
03:12:518 (1) - new combo same combo pattern as before
03:23:205 (1) - new combo something happened to my combos, thanks for pointing it out

Overall,really excellent work~STAR[≧▽≦]

00:18:464 (1) - add finish at the start of slider
00:33:464 (4) - ^
00:45:915 (7) - remove finish at the end of slider hearable finish
00:47:040 (1) - add finish at the start of slider
00:46:571 (9) - remove this circle you won't have problems taking it
00:52:290 (3) - add finish
00:54:165 (4) - ^ not give the correct feeling
00:56:040 (4) - add finish at the start of slider
00:59:040 (3) - add finish
01:02:040 (3) - add finish at the start of slider
01:07:946 (3) - remove this circle piano notes pitch crescendo
01:26:040 (1) - finish
01:41:040 (6) - ^
01:53:870 (7) - remove finish hearable finish
01:54:620 (1) - add finish at the start of slider
01:59:870 (6) - finish
02:03:620 (3) - add finish at the start of slider
02:09:620 (2) - ^
02:48:620 (1) - add finish at the start of slider
03:06:518 (4) - add finish at the end of slider not give the correct feeling
03:14:206 (1) - add finish at the start of slider
03:19:456 (7) - finish
03:21:143 (3) - add finish at the end of slider not give the correct feeling
03:23:206 (3) - add finish at the start of slider
03:29:206 (2) - finish not give the correct feeling

DragonSparta wrote:

lolcules' Normal
00:37:214 (1) - Add a clap here Nah, this section isn't using claps at all, such sudden claps wouldn't sound good, whistles are enough.
00:38:714 (2) - ^

DragonSparta wrote:

Haku's Hard
Add some clap where the drum is playing like: I added it where Snare or Snap played
00:25:214 (5) - Add clap Finish-only fit better because: 1 - Clap will be covered by Finish, 2 - It add Taiko variety
02:14:780 (3) - Remove new combo I used that in other part
02:28:932 (3) - Too near to (2) well: 1 - Obviously Graphics motives, 2 - Antijump, 3 - Start And Stop like effect when playing
03:25:467 (1) - Instead of putting this near (1) , why not put it in front of (2) ? Blanket saying *you see me?*

Samah wrote:

[Insane]
Normally I don't pick on hitsounds, but I thought some of the patterns drew too much attention to themselves. Hitsounds are done well when you don't notice them.
Up to you of course.
00:52:102 (2,3,4) - Maybe remove the claps from 2 and 3, and remove the finish from 4.
00:54:727 (1) - Remove this clap?
00:55:852 (1,2) - Remove claps?
00:56:415 (4) through 00:59:040 (6) - This hitsound pattern doesn't really match the music.
01:59:682 (4,5) - Remove claps?
02:03:432 (1,2) - ^
03:07:268 (6,7) - ^
03:07:831 (10) - Add clap.
03:19:268 (2,3) - Remove claps.
03:23:018 (1,2) - ^

208,172,172745,1,0
208,172,172932,2,0,B|264:152|328:180|344:248|304:304,1,219.999993443489
297,321,173870,2,0,B|253:365|177:349|165:293,1,164.999995082617
256,192,175091,12,4,176206

p3n wrote:

[Easy]
There is one repeated part in each of the 3 KIAIs that feels strange. I wouldn't exactly call it "wrong timed" but after some testing I feel you should really do something here:

I took a look at it, and I was originally ignoring the lyrics and following just the trumpets. However, I think I worked something out for all 3 sections. First one's not the same as others rhythm wise, but the rest are your and lolcubes'.

I didn't do the hitsounds though, since all my hitsounds are based on what's in the map (and there's no cymbal crash there, regardless of how anyone "feels" about it). The claps are a bit more ambiguous, and I'm leaning more towards removing them altogether and using barcodes.

Samah wrote:

[Haku's Hard]
02:28:370 (2,3) - Spacing. Following voice, should be easier to read
03:24:706 (6,1) - This antijump plays strangely. ^

p3n wrote:

[Haku's Hard]
01:04:665 (X) - maybe add a note? ...feels weird to leave out this beat It's actually 1/8 after that point
02:28:932 (3) - ahhhhhhhhh y u no start slider on downbeat??? (start slider on big white tick @02:29:120) *running-in-circles-waving-arms* Maybe *starting an hoOola* i'm following the bass ?
02:28:370 (2) - ...and while you are at it just replace this circle (the one before the slider mentioned above...sorry for the random order) with a short 1x repeat slider to match the song: http://puu.sh/5xot it match the song in the way it is now, if you listen ( that single hit match the piano )
02:52:745 (6,7) - slider timing (and to some extent the starting point of the spinner) makes absolutely no sense to me (read: wrong timed). If you want to focus on the vocals here (good thing!) the two points to map are 02:53:120 and 02:53:870. Maybe try something like this: http://puu.sh/5xsC
(shorten and move spinner to 02:55:091 (keep ending as it was), use a circle where 02:52:745 (6) used to start and move the first slider (7 in picture) to 02:53:120, start the second slider (8 in picture) @02:53:870 and extend to 02:54:995) If you know what you are doing you can also use this code:

208,172,172745,1,0
208,172,172932,2,0,B|264:152|328:180|344:248|304:304,1,219.999993443489
297,321,173870,2,0,B|253:365|177:349|165:293,1,164.999995082617
256,192,175091,12,4,176206

*facedesking* it do start at that point, the vocals. because I didn't want to map only-voice with a long slider ( because the voice here's is on a 1/6, that get things confusing in an Hard )


Some cosmetic stuff (nazi?) [/b]could be done (small allignments of circles/sliders) but nothing gamebreaking - up to you to polish it until you are satisfied imo.[/b] If those cosmetic stuff are nazi, then don't expect me to correct unsawable ( un-see-able) nazi

knjiga wrote:

Haku's hard:
00:46:477 (8,9,10) - move these to the right so they follow the path as with previous ones. Or you can move the 4,5,6,7 pattern to the left with some rotating maybe.
00:52:196 - this triplet feels somewhat weird, maybe remove (2) to make it just normal 1/2s. It's not, listen better

You may also wish to consider setting AR to 6. This will make HR really easy, but since DT is already easy enough it won't matter much for pure HR but, it will add a possibility of DT + HR + HD. but it will not help readability with my style of mapping that need 3+ ARs in Easies, 5+ in Normals, 7+ in Hards and 8+ in Insanes

ShadowLord wrote:

[Haku's Hard]

00:46:477 (8,9,10) - and 01:07:852 (2,3,4) - (and those similar to it in the diff) I had some trouble sight-reading this, even if its properly snapped. it plays a little weird, stacking them played a little nice IMO

00:48:915 (1,2,3,4) - this was nice to play and easy to sight read.

and that's pretty much it. Solid diff.

You're saying you have problem reading curved streams? it might be the skins, as I with my Raildex have no problems...

knjiga wrote:

Easy:
I'm of the opinion that nobody cares about AIBat difficulties or star rating, and took it to heart when making this, which is why there are 1/2 notes in the map. It's never more than 3, and easy players have 2 fingers they can use. If not, I could stream 80 BPM 4ths 8 years ago with one finger, before I even knew about rhythm games. Circle size can't be changed without messing up some of my patterns, so it would need a full remap with slider speed change too, which I don't want to do.

Insane:
Well, the one without claps (insane2) sounds better. then it's off to redo easy's hitsounds

AR 7 is too low, is this intentional? If not, 8 fits and plays much better. This change is really important since there are some weird jumps and antijumps that become less weird with AR 8. AR7 is perfect for this map. If you demand higher AR, then support a feature request or use hard rock, which will push it up to 9.8, or double time which will push it up to AR 9.

ShadowLord wrote:

[Hitsounding]

I really enjoyed lolcubes hitsounds on his diff. I think easy/hard/insane should use the same volume levels atleast, since its a touch to hard. But this is nothing major. I'm using virtually the same volume? In any case, lower your osu volume and turn up your speakers if it's too loud. I don't really like it when the hitsounds blend in so well I can't tell what I'm hitting. May as well be muted.

[Easy]
02:27:620 - It plays fine for me. I likewise understand where you're coming from, but the longs sliders don't fit with the part I am mapping (which is obviously the bass guitar).

02:58:831 (1,2,3) - Its the only 3 note (if you count the slider in) stack you have in the whole diff and was totally unexpected since this is around the end of the difficulty and I already got used to the 2 stacks.. Deleting 2 will remedy this and it still sounds great and plays nice. I can do this one.

[Insane]

01:50:682 (2,1) - On both test plays, this part got me. This distance is really harsh to sight-read. first time I missed, second time I hit it 50. This is my only real complaint. Dunno what happened here, got rid of jump; it wasn't on the other two.

OzzyOzrock wrote:

[lolcubes' Normal]
01:37:290 (2) - Whoa there partner. Middle tick two lower. I didn't use caps.

Was that pointless? Of course
Does it make me a better person? Yes.

The way of the apple.

OzzyOzrock wrote:

[Haku's Hard]
02:28:932 (3) - Very possible to mistake this for an earlier note.
SOLUTION: Rotate it nicely like this: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/156507

Ha Ha. Is he now.
HOW ACCEPTABLE.
.

KingsAL2 wrote:

[Insane]
02:36:245 (7) - New combo Did this
03:08:018 (1) - This 0.75 is useless. You can remove it It's a 0.67x and it's the exact same size as a 1/1 slider but the duration of a 3/2 slider, since the chorus starts 1/2 early.

[Haku's Hard]
00:54:165 (4) - Can be finish it's all =.=", it don't stay here
02:14:870 (1) - Remove new combo 01:07:290 (1,2,3,4) - ,plus As you surely seen, I did NC every word there
03:21:143 (3-2nd) - Finish also Say why? it's the 2nd nosense finish you suggest -.-"
03:29:206 (2) - ^ With this the 3rd
03:34:456 (1) - Remove new combo1:07:290 (1,2,3,4) - ,plus As you surely seen, I did NC every word there

4. Somehow letting people know that there is a jump (I don't really get this one, which is why it's last)

xsrsbsns wrote:

Some suggestions only:

[Easy]
this diff has higher AR and smaller circles than normal :V Lowered AR to match, but I made the map on cs4, and spacing isn't right on cs3.
01:44:040 (3) - add a finish to head I swear I fixed this before
02:12:620 (1) - add a finish?
02:31:557 (2,3) - i wouldn't do that. 3 more circles ahead too. changed 3 to a slider, which actually fits better
02:51:620 (2) - add a finish
03:08:018 (1) - where does this slider end? i think 03:08:581 is a lot better 2 green timing sections
Also I snuck in some hitnormals and fixed some timing sections that I saw. I think I accidentally used an old version or uploaded the wrong one.

[Insane]
00:21:651 (2) - not stacked correctly? or on purpose hmm may as well fix them. This was sort of bugging me
01:29:227 (2) - same as above
03:22:456 (1) - add new combo?

[Hard]
00:47:040 (1) - add a finish to head
00:54:165 (4) - add a finish
01:54:620 (1) - add a finish to head
03:06:518 (4) - add a finish to end
03:21:143 (3) - ^
03:29:206 (2) - add a finish

Useless Combo mod

cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:

[Normal]

SPOILER

00:41:790 - whistle No thanks. The vocal is coming a red tick before and after this spot, the whistle was used to mainly bring out the voice at parts.
03:16:831 - NC ? No thanks. The combo is following the vocals here, which starts just after this spot.
and soft hitclaps dont fit this song at all, i sugest you to remove them all ( or at least remove those claps which placed at the same note with wistle and finish sounds ( like this 01:53:870, 02:02:870) ( and reduce volume for each clap ) it sounds much better without claps.....
No thanks, I used claps to give a more rhythmic feeling to the music and I find it quite relaxing. The clap itself is kinda dry, and that's probably why it's probably not the best thing ever, but this works imo, so I won't change it.

Agkaemon wrote:

All suggestions. Mostly a bit of perfectionism, as it is very well done overall
[Insane]
00:56:790 (6) - This feels slightly unneccesary but I fear it'll break the pattern if you remove it. Hitsounds fix this.
00:58:102 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - A bit too much beat for this part. Hitsounds fix this.
so these aren't a problem because of the hitsounds? I'm following the bass here in any case.
01:59:495 (3) - Instead of returning to (2) you could make it flow up and as a circle. not sure what you mean here, so I'll just move 1
02:56:768 (2,3,4) - These work, but they don't look pretty in my opinion, you can very likely enhance their positions. I compare to the following patterns such as 03:00:143 (3,4,5,6)changed the order a bit to make mah star

Agkaemon wrote:

All suggestions. Mostly a bit of perfectionism, as it is very well done overall

[Haku's Hard]
Small hitcircles. Annoying to me, a reason I skip maps, but it's mostly a personal issue to me.

Patterns in this one, while fine, are a bit too "square" so to speak, not as natural as the other difficulties. Mapping style, I guess.

00:49:665 (5,1,2) - is a bit cramped

00:53:602 (3,4,5,6) - A bit confusing

02:52:745 (6,7) - Emphasis in vocals, follows drums.

I didn't like this map for playing it myself. Tastes.
A few sections do not do justice to the Kiai.

Agkaemon wrote:

[lolcubes' Normal]
00:38:901 (1) - This spinner I'd feel it a bit better like a break; hard to decide
02:52:932 (4) - I know you can make this slider look better.
03:08:956 (2,3,4,5) - You might like making these following the vocals.

1. Tags :
   1. You have added "to aru" in the tags, however if someone search "to aru majutsu no index" in the game, he will not find your map. You shall add "majutsu no index" after "to aru" then (In all difficulties of course)
   2. Why "rimless" is in the tags, it's already in the title :/

1. Consider using Circle Size 3, Normal use CS3 and this diff CS4, It's kinda weird :/
2. About the other map settings, they are the same as in Normal and they are kinda high for an Easy. I'm fine with AR4, but you should reduce the OD and the HPdrain.
3. 00:28:214 - This spot needs a note because of the heavy note, besides you did it at 00:32:714 (2), so for consistency you have to something here.
4. 00:54:352 (4) - This slider is very confusing (only 1/2 after the previous slider and it's kinda sudden here), there is no actual reason to do this. Consider only mapping this beat 00:54:727.
5. 01:41:040 (3,1) - Intervert the new combo, (3) starts on a downbeat and it's where the vocals starts

1. I don't really like the circle size here, but it's your choice.
2. 00:38:901 (5) - You have silenced this circle, which is unrankable (because it's too confusing, etc.). Besides, there is no actual reson to have a note here, maybe to follow the vocals however this note is unexpected here and I strongly recommand you to remove it.
3. 00:45:821 (6) - I understand why you have added this circle here, but I don't really like this kind of patterns, besides the pattern is at the bottom of the screen which is kinda uncomforable to play :/
   I suggest you to remove this circle. It would be more playable and pleasant.

1. 02:56:206 to 03:05:206 - I'm ok with the previous jumps, but here the jumps are too big for a part which is slow !
2. 03:08:018 (1) - In my opinion, 0.75x ~ 0.80x flows better.
3. 03:16:831 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - his kind of patterns are really confusing when they are consecutive like this, when I testplayed it I was like "o.o where should I click now". consider rearranging this pattern or making it more readable please.
4. 03:34:456 (7) - A new combo is missing here ~

KuraiPettan wrote:

General :

1. Tags :
   1. You have added "to aru" in the tags, however if someone search "to aru majutsu no index" in the game, he will not find your map. You shall add "majutsu no index" after "to aru" then (In all difficulties of course)
   2. Why "rimless" is in the tags, it's already in the title :/

nobody's going to type out "to aru majutsu no index". I suppose it doesn't hurt to add it though. "rimless world" is the title of the song (fuchinashi is rimless or something like that, and sekai is world).


Easy :

1. Consider using Circle Size 3, Normal use CS3 and this diff CS4, It's kinda weird :/
2. About the other map settings, they are the same as in Normal and they are kinda high for an Easy. I'm fine with AR4, but you should reduce the OD and the HPdrain. I wanted to let easy mod not be so much of a joke.
3. 00:28:214 - This spot needs a note because of the heavy note, besides you did it at 00:32:714 (2), so for consistency you have to something here. yep
4. 00:54:352 (4) - This slider is very confusing (only 1/2 after the previous slider and it's kinda sudden here), there is no actual reason to do this. Consider only mapping this beat 00:54:727. changed to a slider
5. 01:41:040 (3,1) - Intervert the new combo, (3) starts on a downbeat and it's where the vocals starts standardized the combos at that part. I had a stupid reason for doing it before.

also changed around some stacks.

Insane :

1. 02:56:206 to 03:05:206 - I'm ok with the previous jumps, but here the jumps are too big for a part which is slow ! I exaggerated the jumps here because I really dislike when a "slow" part gets its spacing cut in half. This section is supposed to be intense. It's the transitional bridge into the last chorus and is supposed to be filled with emotion, and I tried to map that emotion with jumps. If you lessen the jumps it loses some of that feeling, and some of the difficulty. As far as I know, Border of Death is the only other map that does this, and while I didn't like the rhythms associated with it, I did like the feeling of the jumps there, which is what I'm trying to achieve here. I also don't think it's ridiculously hard, just something osu! is not used to. 4.0x may seem like a lot, but those are on sliders which don't break combo if you miss,
2. 03:08:018 (1) - In my opinion, 0.75x ~ 0.80x flows better. It's so it's the same length as a 1/2 slider. Confusing maybe, but it's insane.
3. 03:16:831 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - his kind of patterns are really confusing when they are consecutive like this, when I testplayed it I was like "o.o where should I click now". consider rearranging this pattern or making it more readable please. really? I thought this was pretty tame in comparison to the usual stack stack stack I see all the time. I'm going to leave it, because at least one person who modded it said they really liked it, and it is supposed to be insane (even though it's more of a hard+).
4. 03:34:456 (7) - A new combo is missing here ~ It's the same as the previous sections

KuraiPettan wrote:

[b]Haku's Hard :

1. I don't really like the circle size here, but it's your choice.
2. 00:38:901 (5) - You have silenced this circle, which is unrankable (because it's too confusing, etc.). Besides, there is no actual reson to have a note here, maybe to follow the vocals however this note is unexpected here and I strongly recommand you to remove it.
   I'm actually following a mix of drums and vocal (this represent the hitsound I inserted, the snap), anyway the volume of al section before the spinner is 30% now)
3. 00:45:821 (6) - I understand why you have added this circle here, but I don't really like this kind of patterns, besides the pattern is at the bottom of the screen which is kinda uncomforable to play :/
   I suggest you to remove this circle. It would be more playable and pleasant.
   Song-wise it is a 1/3 note, and making a slider end in 1/3 isn't a good idea, too just deleting it is even worser ( as the slider will and on nothing ) So the kinda used streamy note seemed the best idea, as the stream like this will follow the voice "trail", so, not deleting it

1. 01:04:290 (2,1) - not fan of note following slider so soon in easy.. maybe follow vocal instead? Edit: I meant to suggest combining both into one slider that follows vocal sorry~
2. 01:37:290 (1) - NC? and remove NC on 01:38:040 (3)
3. 02:05:870 (2,3) - same as above
4. 02:28:932 - 02:38:870 - a bit tricky rhythm here
5. 03:24:706 (2) - 1/2 later on timeline and respace

• ok cool

1. I'm not a fan of this circle size on hard.. it's smaller than insane too
2. this difficulty feels really cramped, it's harder for less experienced players to see small differences in spacing in order to tell rhythm apart
3. stacking the triplets or something would make them a lot easier to read
4. 00:45:821 (6,7,8,9,10) - I failed here on first playthrough since the spacing looked so similar to previous part.. and rhythm doesn't make sense to me
5. 02:44:870 (1,2,3) - stack?

1. 00:53:415 (2,3 / 4,5) - this is stretching it a bit, reduce spacing? to 2.0 atleast
2. 00:56:415 (4,5,6,7) - ^, this part is harder than the rest of your map aside from the end
3. 02:00:245 (8,1,2,3,4) - ^
4. 02:03:995 (4,5,6,7) - I just don't like how this plays
5. 02:43:370 (4,1) - this jump didn't feel right to me
6. 02:56:206 - 03:04:643 - spacing change here doesn't feel right on quiet section of song

silklash wrote:

~All suggestions~

Easy

1. 01:04:290 (2,1) - not fan of note following slider so soon in easy.. maybe follow vocal instead? why would the time matter?
2. 01:37:290 (1) - NC? and remove NC on 01:38:040 (3)
3. 02:05:870 (2,3) - same as above
4. 02:28:932 - 02:38:870 - a bit tricky rhythm here remapped
5. 03:24:706 (2) - 1/2 later on timeline and respace I wanted the finishes here

Insane

1. 00:53:415 (2,3 / 4,5) - this is stretching it a bit, reduce spacing? to 2.0 atleast
2. 00:56:415 (4,5,6,7) - ^, this part is harder than the rest of your map aside from the end
3. 02:00:245 (8,1,2,3,4) - ^
4. 02:03:995 (4,5,6,7) - I just don't like how this plays
5. 02:43:370 (4,1) - this jump didn't feel right to me fixed
6. 02:56:206 - 03:04:643 - spacing change here doesn't feel right on quiet section of song commented on this earlier

some inconsistencies made it really hard for me to read first playthrough

Garven wrote:

'sup ziin

[General]
You may want to full submit. I didn't get the Normal on a fresh download. argh

[Storyboard]
Some of the images you chose to use vary so much stylistically that it's very jarring to see as they pass by. Mainly looking at d, q, and r. Some of the images look really aliased blown up to full screen too.
Map was made when 800x600 was max SB size. Technically it still is. surprising though to see that there's a lot of new stuff, so I'm going to be replacing the SB images in the near future.

[Easy]
00:41:040 (1) - Eew, whistle on slider slide. There are others too. I just don't like them since whenever they try to actually accent something in the music, it just sounds like static instead.
00:42:540 (1) - This new combo really needed? (both these apply to copy/paste later on) no, but is any new combo ever needed? 1st maps the first part, 2nd maps the echo by backup voices. I did this in insane, wanted to do something similar here.
01:04:290 (2) - The transition from the soft slider slides to the normal slider slide here sounds kinda eh.
02:52:182 (2) - I know you can see the slider after the hit burst is gone, but it just kind of looks like tacky placement the way it is now. I love easy fixes like this
03:08:018 (1) - Really nice effect here. Only thing that bugged me was the spacing from the 2 -> this. Felt a little too close. I swear this is an osu bug. It is too close.

sliders have never bothered me so I'm going to leave them.

[Insane]
Some of the spacing felt kinda wonky since the jumps didn't feel very natural to me. This usually occurred on the 1/2 rhythms such as 03:29:393 (5,1) - where there wasn't an easily evident reason behind it beyond just an instrument change or something, though 00:59:602 (1,2,3) - was a little tricky too. It ended up me watching the circles for the rhythms instead of kicking back and enjoying the music and map. It's not your normal jump map. I threw in jumps to accent notes, and you'll note there's very few jumpstreams like you'll find in a lot of siriru style maps (just one per kiai rather than every 4th measure). All the jumps are natural for me, mostly because my style is different and stepmania-based.

silklash wrote:

~All suggestions~

Haku's Hard

1. I'm not a fan of this circle size on hard.. it's smaller than insane too It's an hard, and won't change CS
2. this difficulty feels really cramped, it's harder for less experienced players to see small differences in spacing in order to tell rhythm apart There is a contradiction, as Hard isn't meant to be played by players with no experience
3. stacking the triplets or something would make them a lot easier to read while killing almost all the "walking" effect and the graphic i want to give? hell no.
4. 00:45:821 (6,7,8,9,10) - I failed here on first playthrough since the spacing looked so similar to previous part.. and rhythm doesn't make sense to me Haku's rhythmn explanation funtime! : 00:45:821 (6) It's a VOICE note (Ta), 00:45:915 (7) Other than the "me" it fall a bass in the start and the faint cymbal at the end,00:46:477 (8,9,10) it follow the voice "trail", changed with a slider anyway
5. 02:44:870 (1,2,3) - stack? Doesn't if follow the music better like this? Chi(1)-ga(2,3)

Why is stack leniency so low? Stuff like 01:20:040 (1,2) - isn't stacking correctly. Notes like this aren't meant to stack anyway, and even stacking won't help much (the fact the hitburst cover it it's default skin related moreover). I'll manually stack if it's unavoidable(say where)
Same commentary on soft whistle slider slides bluh It happen i can't hear them as the volume of hitsounds is lower than music and the is hearable only with high volume on hitsounds and lower song volume
00:45:821 (6) - Is this rhythms really necessary? hear it better, the "tame ni" start here, or better, start a bit before on 1/3
02:01:557 (3) - This slider feels awkward in the overall feel of the rhythms you have set up here. more because you can't hear 02:01:182 (2,3,4,5) rhythmn better and see how it's following the snaps
02:28:370 (2,1) - Spacing is a little dodgy here. There was something similar earlier in the map, but it didn't bug me as much as this one did. Eh. Early clicker or impatient player, in 02:27:620 (1,2,1) you couldn't see it was following the bass
02:52:745 (6,7) - I'm not really sure what you're trying to follow in the music here. the end of 6 have a snap, hear better
03:25:456 (1,2) - That's just cruel to place so far into a slow song like this. Sense-having antijump have sense, There is a false stop in the instrumental.

Sakura Hana wrote:

[Insane]
00:41:040 (1) - Missing new combo.
01:48:620 (1) - Missing new combo. Argh spinners
03:16:831 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I don't see any reason for the triplets to go back and forth? it's not like there's a bigger timing distance between 1,3 than 3,2 and so on, and don't seem to go with the music either.
I've had comments that it's awesome, and I've had comments that it doesn't make sense. To me it fits because of the pattern mostly, but also because it's jump jump normal x3. Where we feel jumps is not always the same from person to person either. I'm not a fan of jump combos personally. Also note I did a similar pattern in the beginning, where it was just slider stacked note x3. The 2nd time through I did the complete opposite. It's all to create some variety

[Easy]
Feels a bit fast for a song that is pretty calm. Try a slower slider speed (probably around 0.7) I hate slow easies. Easy typically has a low SV, big circles, and godawful overlaps. I feel I did a good job avoiding that. The only overlaps are the 1/2 after slider notes which are clear as day (since they overlap just a little bit). I'm also not convinced that newbies need to FC a map on their first try. The map's plenty easy to pass, which is the important thing.
03:19:081 (3) - It could be problematic that the hitburst at this slider end isnt gone by the time the player has to hit the slider start, and easy shouldn't have any blind notes. fixed
I dunno, the patterns look a bit too complex for an Easy map, but i'd be writing a wall of text if i were to point out each, so i'll mostly be happy if you avoid stacking double notes.
AIMod lists them all since it's technically "normal" difficulty for less than 200 ms objects, however I didn't stack any of these notes (on purpose). If I have to remove them, I'd rather up the difficulty and call it normal. Since that's obviously not a good idea, I wouldn't feel right without removing them all, which ruins 03:08:018 (1,2) - in my eyes.

Sakura Hana wrote:

[Haku's Hard]
02:52:745 (6) - Feels like it should start at: 02:52:995 instead.
02:53:495 (7) - Feels like it should start at: 02:53:870 instead.
02:54:338 (1) - Spinner can be removed if you fix the above, tho they need to be fixed as it follows the music better.

those wrote:

From .:Let those mod those maps:.

[General]
Here, "nee" is a romanization of ねー, is that the as ねえ? Great storyboard by the way.

I don't write the lyrics. I just report them

Consider adding custom colours.　This is a personal decision. I want the player to choose the best colors for them.
Add "railgun" to tags? This isn't railgun, it's raildex. It would be a lie to put in railgun.

[Easy]
00:52:290 (1) - RNC
00:53:040 (3) - NC
Either way I'm going to have a disproportionate number of beats per combo. In this song I mapped mostly to the lyrics and phrases, and I hope that it came out that way, even though this would normally be good advice

[lolcubes' Normal]
02:51:620 (1) - Seeing how this part is leading into the breakdown, consider extending this slider to 02:52:370? Conveniently, you can add a clap that you're missing on this beat :3
this makes a really long "stream" that I didn't like for normal.
Good luck :3