pieguy1372 wrote:

I also found it somewhat suspicious how you didn't do RVS RQS "because people didn't like it"

akrolsmir wrote:

I would totally vote Swifttail right now, except meta apparently excuses him? (rantai, I looked through both Mind Games, he didn't seem to be in there)

Chris wrote:

self preservation above all d1

that's not hard to understand

NoHItter wrote:

Yes, but you don't self preservation vote until nearing the deadline.

Rolled wrote:

NoHItter wrote:

Yes, but you don't self preservation vote until nearing the deadline.

Chris: Uggh, your posts remind me of Two except not as egocentric and obnoxious.

pieguy1372 wrote:

Also, in every game I played the person lynched D1 was lynched "because he was suspicious" and he was always town. This is just basic statistics at hand as I mentioned before, especially when you consider the mafia tries to NOT be suspicious... This is just my idea of how to play the game, and IMO it's worked a lot better than lynching town members who screw up, instead of actually showing signs of wanting to hinder town progress or mislead us. >.>

Wojjan wrote:

NoHItter, pieguy, scum team of the year?

Chris wrote:

there is no information on d1

NoHItter wrote:

Wojjan wrote:

NoHItter, pieguy, scum team of the year?

How did what pieguy make you think we're both scum?

@Chris
So you still think that one should prioritize self-preservation over information in voting long before the deadline?

Rolled wrote:

Everything in this game is speculations. You can't even take the information you receive from the host as fact, as you now know ^__^

With your logic, a vanilla townie would just RV the whole way through a mafia game. All they have is speculation.

I feel you're underestimating the usefulness and power of speculation, though.

Rolled wrote:

So what's classified as information as opposed to speculation?

Rolled wrote:

Do you realize how little in mafia is confirmed? Nine times out of ten a decision must be made without previous confirmation on whether it's good or bad.

This is really derailing the thread though. I'm just showing flaws in your argument.

Rolled wrote:

Nobody is arguing that information on d1 is generally lower than information in later days. What people are arguing is that there is no information to be gathered day 1.

Rantai wrote:

And there lies the disagreement (that I have at least).

I see information as anything that can be used to read a player, whether that be 'speculation' or otherwise. At the very least it could help with choosing a D1 lynch as opposed to blindly picking or 'gut voting'.

.....Wow ninjas.

Rolled wrote:

So are you suggesting that we do not have more information on you than we have against somebody who has posted 0 times?

This conversation is such a derailer so just admit you are wrong and be on with it.

Rolled wrote:

I gathered that you're bad at mafia

Rolled wrote:

If a hypothetical situation arises in which a bus driver were to switch you with player x, and player x dies, it's more likely that you are a strongman rather than you shooting yourself anticipating my switch. Hypothetically.

See, I concluded that due to information I gathered on day 1.

Chris wrote:

tell me then what you've gathered from me posting? I'd love to hear this

Rantai wrote:

Chris wrote:

tell me then what you've gathered from me posting? I'd love to hear this

Well you could say I've gathered that you don't believe anything that is unconfirmed as useful

Which is fine, we're all entitled to our own opinion.

But also, my initial thoughts of you back when you were fueling the fires under Swift and Lybydose was "why are you doing this?"

So yes, what were you hoping to find/achieve with that? Somehow I don't think your intention was for them to vote each other.

Rantai wrote:

To be honest, I would have thought voting last minute would have been the smarter way to do so because voting the person with the most/second most votes would've raised a few eyebrows. Especially if it was only based on saving themselves.

It's now Day 1. You have 72 hours from this post until nightfall.

That's september 19th 12:13 am EST, september 18th 9:13 pm PST afaik correct me if I'm wrong

Chris wrote:

that's where the bandwagon comes in though, especially with mafia members

see someone with a bunch of votes, add on another, next person does the same all to just confirm their place at least past d1

if you don't take the offensive you're just going to end up getting voted for

just like whats happening with swifttail now since he decided to pout rather than vote

akrolsmir wrote:

Swift, instead of talking about yourself (which you don't seem to be very good at), how about you tell us who you think is suspicious?

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

Chris: Really? If I really was mafia, and he was, too, why would he attack me? That's not a good tactic, especially if it's D1.

Wojjan wrote:

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

Chris: Really? If I really was mafia, and he was, too, why would he attack me? That's not a good tactic, especially if it's D1.

hahahahahahahahahaHAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

But again, I've said this before, and I'll say it again: "To be blunt, I am not mafia."

0_o wrote:

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

But again, I've said this before, and I'll say it again: "To be blunt, I am not mafia."

New plan guys, everyone who isn't mafia say so.

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

I'm going to be honest, what I say is the truth. I know that I've been acting like a complete idiot, but if I lied to you, I personally wouldn't say "to be blunt," but if you want to think that I am the mafia, go right ahead. I'm not gonna stop you. Just keep in mind that last game, when this EXACT SAME THING happened, I turned up town. (I'm confusing myself when I say this, because I clearly said that I didn't want to bring this back up, but here I am, doing it anyway. I'm such a hypocrite.)

Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:

Also, FoS Faceman, Wojjan. Pick on the new guy, eh? Is that your tactic?

animask wrote:

@foulcoon When don't I? Also, I'm assuming people are FoSing DxS because he might be avoiding something?

Chris wrote:

why so bandwagon suburu

Swift wrote:

Faceman: If I do my calculations correctly, there's a 2 in 3 chance that I'm still town.

0_o wrote:

hmm

Swift wrote:

Faceman: If I do my calculations correctly, there's a 2 in 3 chance that I'm still town.

What makes you think there are 5 mafia?

Rolled wrote:

Usually when you're unable to roleclaim, you are also unable to say you are unable to claim.

Wojjan wrote:

well Hitter assume you're both mafs for a second. pieguy knows you're maf and votes you as a "gut feeling" which wow chigga wow boom bang he's a maf! pieguy definitely looks town now, lynching a maf D1!

animask wrote:

@VashWolf SwiftTail Anything you post can be used against you. You have the right to remain silent (for a while). I don't think roleclaiming will save you at this point. Stop trying to poorly defend yourself and make some logical deductions on your own. Also don't OMGUS FoS people... please.

NoHItter wrote:

Some people are saying that Swift feels sort of like animask, but that's not a valid excuse to not vote for him. (Then again, I don't believe in meta)

10. don't try to exploit things pls