animask lurked the thread and then left, even after your post Rantai.
ooOooOooo
ooOooOooo
so we're 9+ days into the game and you've already said you didn't read day 1, and I guess with this post you are saying you didn't read day 2animask wrote:
I'm in a tl;dr mood right now...
(Stop voting for me lol xD)
"Is X town"Chris wrote:
What would you like me to say to the host N2?
you don't trust me yet you "want the doctor to protect chris every night" XD XD XDHaneii wrote:
Also, anyway to test if Chris is telling the truth about his role? (ignoring watcher results because I don't trust Two XD - Leaning towards town but I can't put my trust in you completely, sorry)
Wow, that's nearly spot on o.o (except for the specifics. ie: names like you or wojjan). Get out of my head Two :UTwo wrote:
do you think that he picked 1 mafia to claim as town? all town to claim as town? how about two? would the two mafia be myself and wojjan? if that were the case, you'd have 3 mafia entangled in that, so you see this is a slippery slope
Might not be clear - ^ referring to Two there, not Chris.Haneii wrote:
Leaning towards town but I can't put my trust in you completely, sorry
I'd still like some kind of confirmation that what he's telling us is legit. With the way things are going it looks like town is willing to depend on him for the most part. Like I said, it would be terrible if he turns up mafia and we've been thinking his statmenst/results were true the whole time @_@ (can you say set back?) + role seems too good to be true. [/pessimism]Two wrote:
if you trust chris, and chris says he was told xyz are confirmed town, then you should believe xyz are confirmed town
(That was me) In that case we get three more days of information from chris. If he detects wisely then we've pretty much won by then.pieguy1372 wrote:
Someone proposed that we lynch Chris if he wasn't NK'ed in a few days. However, with that proposal, the mafia could use WIFOM.
Don't bother. If we try to set something up he'll know and could tell the truth for that particular investigation. In fact, if he were mafia he'd obviously be feeding us half-truths- if he flipped scum I'd assume at least half of the four he picked out day 1 are really town.Haneii wrote:
I'd still like some kind of confirmation that what he's telling us is legit.
I can not ask questions, only make statements. There are no restrictions only anything, and I only get told True/False.foulcoon wrote:
Side Note: are there any restrictions to the questions you can ask, or is everything fair game?
This is a closed setup game.bmin11 wrote:
Mod: Are GMTs included in BAT?
Can you mod my map? It's a Touhou map...akrolsmir wrote:
Sakura Hana
Replacements will only be made when a prod is not responded to, or if requested by the player themselves.bmin11 wrote:
Mod: Replacement request for animask and Mashley
Prods have been sent.bmin11 wrote:
Prod: animask and Mashley
I am ALWAYS confusing.bmin11 wrote:
LunaticMara - none. Was rather confusing reading his posts.
So basically we leave mash alive, and if I'm NKed ever then either we gain another confirmed town / survivor, we gain a lyncher who targets the mafia, or he'll win (which I assume this game is a multi-win, but if it's not then the mafia risk losing by killing me.)Mafiawiki wrote:
The Lyncher is a third-party role whose win condition is to get a specific person (the Lynchee) lynched. If the Lynchee is lynched while the Lyncher is alive and on the Lynchee's wagon, the Lyncher wins. If the Lyncher dies first or the Lyncher is the only scum left in the game and the Lynchee is still alive, the Lyncher loses.
Mods have differing policies in regard to what happens if a Lynchee is nightkilled: the Lyncher may gain the pro-Town Win Condition, may become a Survivor, may change their Lynchee to whoever made that kill, or may win as if that player had gotten lynched.
Please do provide some justification first (your votes' are still on me, and I'd prefer not to be lynched on a whim)LadySuburu wrote:
If we don't, as I said before I'm voting for whoever I feel like.
Agreed. I still can't read much, in part due to the inactivity of some people.Wojjan wrote:
I kinda just wanna string up a lurker as a warning by now really. They're no use, so it's easy for mafs to lurk with them then
I just haven't unvoted yet, since I don't see a need to. I'm still deciding on who I think should be lynched.akrolsmir wrote:
Please do provide some justification first (your votes' are still on me, and I'd prefer not to be lynched on a whim)
Agreed. I still can't read much, in part due to the inactivity of some people.
This post gave me a real bad feeling. It was the main reason I started to look at you.akrolsmir wrote:
Lynch is in less than a day now, you'd better have good reasons for not voting.
Ironically, the other people I'm considering voting are all of the players not striked out on this list.Votecount wrote:
DxS (5)Two, Lilac, akrolsmir, LunaticMara, foulcoon
Why wouldn't a vig be able to kill DxS? He already avoided lynch somehow, are you saying he could avoid bullets too? That would be OP :Swhich in my mind is encouraging a vigilante to do it
Someone else also pointed to that post as suspicious I think. What I don't understand is how trying to get people to vote and reminding them of a deadline is a bad thing.LadySuburu wrote:
This post gave me a real bad feeling. It was the main reason I started to look at you.akrolsmir wrote:
Lynch is in less than a day now, you'd better have good reasons for not voting.
Why do you join every single mafia game if you don't want to read or post? Do you really just join these to troll people?animask wrote:
/me goes back to doing nothing.
please never join another game everanimask wrote:
I'm not really interested in this game in particular. I just joined thinking I would have a cool role or something.
Modkill request
Mashley - He isn't pro town, neither is he mafiaTwo wrote:
what is everyone's reason for each player above not being mafia
Mashley - roleclaimed, so I don't think he's mafiaTwo wrote:
Mashley
animask
Lilac
pieguy1372
foulcoon
DeathxShinigami
akrolsmir
Haneii
bmin11
Rantai
LunaticMara
what is everyone's reason for each player above not being mafia
Rantai was pro-town in the game he linked, and it seems like him referring to the questions previously answered was a forced attempt at consistent meta. It's not the fact that he didn't want to re-answer the same questions; I don't blame him, but it's how he responded that alarmed me.Rantai wrote:
In regards to your questions: viewtopic.php?p=975713#p975713 No change.
The "we should see how the mafia reacts" bit is just very strange wording. Not only is it an attempt to align himself with town, but it's also suggesting the mafia members are apparent, in a strangely worded kind of way. Zzz, hard to get my point across. I just don't like this post.Rust wrote:
I think we should see how the mafia reacts to his claim before we try to analyze it.
you are the second person to use "Two is wrong a lot" as an argument against his role, and the second person to supply no evidence to support their claimRolled wrote:
I want to suggest that perhaps Chris can be an insane/naive variation of Two/lie detector. Two is in fact wrong a lot, and the brokenness of this role should have been apparent to faceman.
I'm sorryLilac wrote:
To be honest, I want to hear more from you, Haneii. Dragging me out just to do this. Frowny face.
LadySuburu wrote:
DxS's nonlynch was my fault. I woke up one hour to late to vote for DxS over NoHItter.
Claim: strager
Since I'm so clever, I can take someone's vote and force it onto another player without it updating the votecount. They can't change the vote from then on either.
That mostly sums up what I have to say.Two wrote:
I am against him sending "chris is mafia" because there is no reason to currently believe that his role is inaccurate, and it:
1. wastes a night of his ability
2. clears the stage for another aux to die in vain
the very suggestion of this by someone who knows as much as you makes me think you're mafia
Rolled wrote:
Suggesting that Chris sends the following statement N2: "Chris is mafia." Opinions?
Might be a waste of time - not sure how long chris will be alive for + would like to get information that can help with lynch decisions first.
Keep in mind that he got silenced today. I know he was inactive at the start of the day, but he can't respond to your comments.pieguy1372 wrote:
DxS - I don't know, he's to inactive
Your definition of proven differs a lot from mine. I won't have confidence in his role's straight-forwardness until it's confirmed by the host in the form of either that question, or post-game role setup. How useful is the information he's providing us with if we can't be certain of its validity? Not to mention, I could WIFOM all day with "If his information is invalid, mafia won't lynch him tonight" etc etc etc. The only way to be certain is for him to ask that or a similar question. And yes, you are wrong enough to have "Naive" in front of a role modeled around yourself ^__^. Women's intuition, after all.Two wrote:
you are the second person to use "Two is wrong a lot" as an argument against his role, and the second person to supply no evidence to support their claimRolled wrote:
I want to suggest that perhaps Chris can be an insane/naive variation of Two/lie detector. Two is in fact wrong a lot, and the brokenness of this role should have been apparent to faceman.
it's been practically proven by this point that he got the 4 people he listed correct, so are you honestly saying that he just got lucky?
I am against him sending "chris is mafia" because there is no reason to currently believe that his role is inaccurate, and it:
1. wastes a night of his ability
2. clears the stage for another aux to die in vain
the very suggestion of this by someone who knows as much as you makes me think you're mafia
and if you recall, in the game where I famously said that, I was rightRolled wrote:
Women's intuition, after all.
I have been thinking about this one for a while, I have a gut feeling that every result he gets may come out true. Perhaps a statement saying that the other players that he didn't check are pro-town might be able to verify this. (ie A, B, C etc are pro-town)Rolled wrote:
Chris: There really isn't any part of me that feels Chris is mafia, however, I want to suggest that perhaps Chris can be an insane/naive variation of Two/lie detector. Two is in fact wrong a lot, and the brokenness of this role should have been apparent to faceman. I can't consider the fact that faceman/lyby would let this role be as it appears on paper, there has to be something hidden within it. Suggesting that Chris sends the following statement N2: "Chris is mafia." Opinions?
I admit that was very lazy of me but the question layout was identical and I had not changed my opinions in the space of 2 or so games so I thought it would be easier to link instead of retyping.Rolled wrote:
Rantai: This maaaay be grasping, but it definitely crossed my mind as I was reading this post:
etc etc
it's weak because we are arguing the strength of his role after the factRolled wrote:
How is it weak?