confirmed
Some questions for you guys:1.Non-essential Aux. Gambits are fun, and it allows me freedom to do mostly whatever I want.
1) What role and faction do you prefer to play as, and why?
2) Are you up for lynching lurkers?
3) Do you believe in using meta as a scumhunting tool?
4) How often do you plan to post in the thread?
pieguy1372 wrote:
1) What role and faction do you prefer to play as, and why?
Town, because when I'm mafia I suck at hiding it (see last game I was in)
2) Are you up for lynching lurkers?
That depends on whether the active people are suspicious. If they aren't, I'm for it because it's more likely the lurkers are mafia.
3) Do you believe in using meta as a scumhunting tool?
Generally it can be used nicely, but some people do strange things thus making it not work.![]()
4) How often do you plan to post in the thread?
Whenever I have something to say~![]()
Some questions for you guys:1. Town with a role that doesn't require guessing who should be targeted. I was doctor once and I hated it.
1) What role and faction do you prefer to play as, and why?
2) Are you up for lynching lurkers?
3) Do you believe in using meta as a scumhunting tool?
4) How often do you plan to post in the thread?
Haneii wrote:
1) I value information so probably roles like mason, stalker, cop, mafia etc...NoHItter wrote:
1) What role and faction do you prefer to play as, and why?
2) Are you up for lynching lurkers?
3) Do you believe in using meta as a scumhunting tool?
4) How often do you plan to post in the thread?
2) Depends heavily on the situation + I haven't played many mafia games/been put into a position where I felt like voting a lurker. As of right now, my answer is no. I don't think I'd be up to lynching lurkers
3)I don't think it's a good idea, borderline pointless. However I'm still new to this game so I might be a bit bias (ie: I have yet to see it help)
4)Hopefully once a day
BOO!Mashley wrote:
Whenever someone does something unusual.
1. I don't see how this is important unless you're following the flavor/ part of your role.bmin11 wrote:
1. How many BAT do you think are around here?
2. Opinions on No Lynch for D1?
For answering Mafia in my Question 1.Chris wrote:
1) What role and faction do you prefer to play as, and why?
I think I prefer being Mafia, mainly just because being the bad guy us always more fun.
Any reason in specific? It helps when you explain your reasoning. Otherwise one might think you're just finding someone to lynch.NoHItter wrote:
FoS: Chris
That is actually pretty clever how you pieced that together, I must admit.NoHItter wrote:
FoS: ChrisFor answering Mafia in my Question 1.Chris wrote:
1) What role and faction do you prefer to play as, and why?
I think I prefer being Mafia, mainly just because being the bad guy us always more fun.
The problem with saying you want to play Mafia in a PyP game is that you actually may pick someone which would probably turn up as Mafia.(Perhaps strager or Dimka)
In a regular PyP game where the mod assigns stuff randomly, it would be less suspicious (mod can assign a town role to a suspicious character), but this PyP has a theme - which is the osu! community. Chances are, the bad guy roles would be those hated/have done something bad. Those who are aiming for Mafia would generally pick those.
But...NoHItter wrote:
OK. Now switching back to my question.
FoS: ChrisFor answering Mafia in my Question 1.Chris wrote:
1) What role and faction do you prefer to play as, and why?
I think I prefer being Mafia, mainly just because being the bad guy us always more fun.
The problem with saying you want to play Mafia in a PyP game is that you actually may pick someone which would probably turn up as Mafia.(Perhaps strager or Dimka)
In a regular PyP game where the mod assigns stuff randomly, it would be less suspicious (mod can assign a town role to a suspicious character), but this PyP has a theme - which is the osu! community. Chances are, the bad guy roles would be those hated/have done something bad. Those who are aiming for Mafia would generally pick those.
Even if he did it wouldn't help him because in this game (apparently) the mafia is made up of BATs. He'd have to know that it advance and choose BATs if he wanted to be mafia...umm, right?. I'm sure chris isn't the only one to mention he'd like to be mafia so why did you choose him?0_o wrote:
A corrupt group of BATs are attempting to take over the osu! community. Find them before it's too late.
Based on this:Haneii wrote:
When TWO says he can only post 3 times a day, does he mean mafia day or once every 24 hours?
It seems like it's once per mafia day. At which point I question spending his last post and only vote on a lurker...Two wrote:
I obviously can't post again until I want to cast my final vote, so stop sucking please.
Speculating about the setup and implying a no lynch seems like you're trying to sidetrack the town from actually doing anything day 1. Vote: bmin11bmin11 wrote:
I have questions too.
1. How many BAT do you think are around here?
2. Opinions on No Lynch for D1?
While I also think a no lynch is bad, speculating about the setup can help town get a better idea of the setup and since mafia would already know the setup it wouldn't make sense for them to wonder about it.akrolsmir wrote:
Speculating about the setup and implying a no lynch seems like you're trying to sidetrack the town from actually doing anything day
That is WIFOM.Chris wrote:
Let's be real here though, I got my role before I answered those questions. I doubt anyone would incriminate themselves on purpose.
Is this serious >.>foulcoon wrote:
Vote: Wojjan
for voting for 99.9% confirmed town
Your entire plan was to see who said they enjoyed playing as the bad guy? Sounds like crap.NoHItter wrote:
That is WIFOM.
Also, the problem with that logic is if you did realize what I was planning before I said it.
There is no reason to call suspicion onto this in the first place. Yes the question is useless, but it's not going to make any difference what you prefer to play as because no one chose their alignment. There was never any indication before the game began of what choices would get a mafia role, and what's more we had to give three choices, so it's almost completely up to chance unless someone picks 3 BATs - in which case it still doesn't make a difference as no one knew that all the mafia would be BATs.Chris wrote:
There is no logical reason under any circumstance for someone to openly admit that they enjoy being the bad guy, assuming they just got their role-PM and it turned out they were indeed Mafia.
0_o wrote:
A corrupt group of BATs are attempting to take over the osu! community. Find them before it's too late.
How is that relevant to BATs?NoHItter wrote:
What do you suppose the names I gave you will be then?
Priority-wise, we treated all three choices as equal. The roles picked were decided mostly by the best role we could come up with out of your selections (while still keeping balance).NoHItter wrote:
Mod: How do you select preference over the 1st choice, etc?
On the top of my head - known troublemakers. The entire corrupt BATs flavor may have not fit his initial intention, but (look two quotes below)Wojjan wrote:
How did Chris know which people to send in to get scum?
I didn't. I said he MAY have a chance to receive a role which he actually likes - which is scum.Wojjan wrote:
Why do you assume Chris actually receiving a role he likes to play?
Tell me then, what do you perceive those I've mentioned as? Townies?Wojjan wrote:
Why do you assume Non-BATs to still be scum when the opening post was adamant in identifying the BATs as mafia?
The problem with DxS is, unlike with picking scum, picking an independent role is harder to influence.Wojjan wrote:
and even so there's the strange singling out on Chris you're doing. DxS answered "Independant" which at worst is killer/cult and at best a survivor and even they can joint with mafia.
"Anything that can kill" can also be a Vig. Not to mention getting specific action roles may be difficult.Wojjan wrote:
Mashley responded with "Anything that can kill." You're focusing so much on Chris that you're starting to look like a lyncher or something
inb4 EphemeralWojjan wrote:
you're starting to look like a lyncher or something
So, you're focused on avoiding scum-tells? That seems suspicious to me.bmin11 wrote:
I guess I should go back lurking since asking a question is clearly a scum-tell in this game >_>
Yes. IF those roles were actually picked, I can see strager being a miller, Roblox can be a noob and as such vanilla town, I don't know Esupantrix. If we're not only going to guess who Chris picked, but also guess what his persumed pick got him as role, then it might be more efficient to just outright asking for a claim. Which I'm sure you'll agree is a bad idea.NoHItter wrote:
Tell me then, what do you perceive those I've mentioned as? Townies?
Then why did you FOS him over it? If you're suspicious of him (which the S in FOS means) you must be either considering or assuming he's mafia or otherwise anti-town.NoHItter wrote:
I didn't. I said he MAY have a chance to receive a role which he actually likes - which is scum.
I never said he did get it. At most, I said he could have influenced the roles he wanted.
Thanks, fixed.rust45 wrote:
NoHitter unvoted just so you know.
Why are you voting someone (who has said barely anything interesting) on gut feeling when you just said you find someone suspicious?pieguy1372 wrote:
However, I'll vote akrolsmir. I can't explain it, just a gut feeling >.<
Because that's what I always do on the first day unless it's painfully obvious. While I find what bmin11 did suspicious, I have a gut feeling he's not mafia.adam2046 wrote:
Why are you voting someone (who has said barely anything interesting) on gut feeling when you just said you find someone suspicious?pieguy1372 wrote:
However, I'll vote akrolsmir. I can't explain it, just a gut feeling >.<
The difference is in how NoHItter uses those questions he had us answer. That does indeed give us information, though what that information means varies from person to person.pieguy1372 wrote:
NoHItter asking questions doesn't make him mafia or town. He did it last game and he was town, so given that that's his strategy as town the optimal mafia strategy would be to mimic it, since it doesn't really directly harm any mafia members...
In other words, NoHItter asking questions dosen't give us any more information.
True that the entire BAT thing was unexpected, but my argument was based on picking the known troublemakers who I didn't think someone would think be town. Fine, I concede the point.Wojjan wrote:
You're also completely avoiding the fact that it's equally hard to gun for mafia if you don't know the flavor and have to send in three roles.
Perhaps I used FoS in the wrong sense in regards to what you perceive of it. I use FoS when I think someone does something suspicious. It does not mean that I think that person is necessarily scum or anti-town. I think a better term would be IGMEOY. So yes I did find Chris suspicious at that time - based on my reasoning.Wojjan wrote:
Then why did you FOS him over it? If you're suspicious of him (which the S in FOS means) you must be either considering or assuming he's mafia or otherwise anti-town.
Speculating about the setupAs rust45 said, this can't be a bad info for us. Is there any kind of anti-town roles who would be interested on how many mafias would there be?
and implying a no lynch seems like you're trying to sidetrack the town from actually doing anything day 1.There was nothing going on at the moment. I wanted to start a discussion with this question. I also don't agree with No Lynch, but by discussing this matter, I was hoping someone could come up with possible tactics and such.
I'm thinking a Serial Killer might benefit from such information.bmin11 wrote:
As rust45 said, this can't be a bad info for us. Is there any kind of anti-town roles who would be interested on how many mafias would there be?
Or he could have been asking a question in order to fill in some gaps of his own. Take the first one, he easily could have just been asking how many mafia does a typical game of this size have.akrolsmir wrote:
It's not just about asking questions, it's also about the content of the questions- the ones you chose seem to be delaying tactics rather than something designed to get content. Filler, so to speak.
Also, claiming that you didn't care about those questions doesn't really alleviate my suspicions.
This again really?Lilac wrote:
Vote: DxS. Talk.
Oh, then that's ok then.DeathxShinigami wrote:
bmin's got a point. There's someone else again whose even more inactive than me...