01:28:958 (2,3,4) - this is very inconsistent with 01:18:580 (2,3,4,5,6) - in terms of spacing and exaggeration
01:41:607 (1) - these long sliders seem a bit off because of the non mapped snare 01:42:255 -
i think its better to have a reverse on them if you want to have a hold note
01:41:607 (1) - imo swapping this with the first measure of this section would be a much better representation of the intensity, because the contrast gets a bit weird with the high pitched melody starting right after the long slider, while the least intense part of this section has way more clickable objects
01:41:607 (1) - I dont understand what long note in the song this might be mapped to, there are new drums and bass noises that you decide to skip over at 01:42:255 - for whatever reason
There is a long sound that's the same as 01:36:417 (1) - but using the long slider here is to represent the sound there more and also to emphasize the upcoming sound of 01:43:228 (2,3,4,5,6) -
i agree with squirrel, if you're going to do it here, make 01:36:417 (1) - longer as well because it seems inconsistent as is
01:47:769 (3) - i think you should change this rhythm to make 01:48:417 - or 01:48:093 - because you have both a downbeat and a strong bass note as passive beats there
I ignored most of the bass in this section to focus on following those sounds like 01:16:309 (2,3,4,5) - and the long sounds I talked about earlier tho
01:57:012 (4,1) - this sudden jump in spacing after the momentum from 01:56:526 (1,2,3,4) - is really difficult, should space it like the previous objects
02:00:174 (2,3) - the other time you use'd fourth rhythm (01:34:309 (2,3,4) ) you didn't use overlaps but here you did :thinking:
before and after the 01:34:309 (2,3,4) - are 1/2 gap, while before 02:00:174 (2,3) - are 1/4, I think you should compare to something like 02:03:661 (4,1) - instead though. Also the spacing after that are reasonable because it's a kick slider so I can larger the spacing a bit.
02:06:580 (3) - Why not make this a 1/1 note stack? It perfectly fits the music... It also shows variation in rhythm because in this section, sliders fall on two sounds. This slider only has one sound, which I think should be represented by a note.
02:16:147 (1,2) - ctrl+g this, it will be a lot more obvious what the intended rhythm is here. These look like they could be spaced with 1/2 atm 02:15:823 (2,1) -
02:18:580 (2,3) - gap between these is a little weird considering you're ignoring the bass that you map at 02:19:553 (5,6,7,8) -
I followed the rhythm 02:17:931 (1,2,3,4) - here because the bass wasn't as audible as the rhythm, while bass 02:19:553 (5,6,7,8) - here because it stands out more. I don't think there's really something wrong about it