mapped by KenFedex
submitted
last updated
Hype Train9 / 5
Nomination Status0 / 2
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

in 01:52:074 - 02:05:574, every 1/4 part (eg. 01:52:324 (112324|5,112324|3) - ) are emphasizing double however it seems too big chordsize and results questionable gp, I think you can reduce single note instead.

Please check those notes:

01:52:324 (112324|3,112324|5) -
01:53:074 (113074|0,113074|2) -
01:54:324 (114324|3,114324|5) -
01:55:074 (115074|0,115074|2) -
01:56:324 (116324|0,116324|2) -
01:57:074 (117074|5,117074|3) -
01:58:324 (118324|0,118324|2) -
01:59:074 (119074|3,119074|5) -
02:00:324 (120324|3,120324|5) -
02:01:074 (121074|2,121074|0) -
02:02:324 (122324|5,122324|3) -
02:03:074 - breaking chordrules(?)
02:04:324 (124324|0,124324|1) -
02:05:074 - also breaking rules(?)

permalink

i made this part with the intention of it being "symmetrical" and it also utilizes anchors on col1 & 6 (for example 01:52:324 (112324|5,112449|5,112574|5) - 01:53:074 (113074|0,113199|0,113324|0)). As for the timestamps that you highlited i'm not really sure if i want to make them as singles because i want them to be symmetrical with eachother, (for example 01:52:074 (112074|2,112074|0,112324|3,112324|5) - 01:52:824 (112824|5,112824|3,113074|2,113074|0)).

Even tho i don't totally agree with this i'll still reduce to singles but i will keep the anchors on col1 & 6 :p. Tell me if anything else needs to be changed regarding this section :3

permalink
Marked as resolved by KenFedex

in 03:16:074 - 03:30:824 - 1/1 chordsizes aren't consistant, which is randomly placed triple or quad imo.

for sure, I suggest following 00:32:074 - 00:45:324 rule, which uses 3-4-3-4... chordsizes, please recheck this part.

permalink

rearranged 03:16:074 - 03:30:824. Chordsizes should be consistent now :3

permalink
Marked as resolved by KenFedex

in 05:28:574 - 05:32:074, I am not sure why you made 1/4 stream in this part, even I considered your intention it is kinda small sound and those gp feels very awkward. I don't think it is not worthy to make 1/4 stream part; suggest remove those 1/4 stream

permalink

hmmmm i thought it would be cool to represent that rising sound with a 1/4 stream lol. Removed 1/4 streams and rearranged notes. Tell me if it needs more changes :P

permalink
Marked as resolved by KenFedex

in 01:22:074 - 01:25:574, 01:28:074 - 01:31:074, 01:32:074 - 01:34:074, this part's stream structure isn't clear for me, here is the reason:

  1. 01:20:824 (80824|0,80824|2,80949|0,80949|2) - those notes are making 2 anchor with stream (col1, 3), but compared with 01:20:324 (80324|4,80324|5,80324|0,80324|3,80386|2,80449|1,80449|3) - they are making single anchor (col 4).
    those stream are results feeling like random stream practice map, you need to make sure streamly rules

  2. 01:22:324 (82324|1,82449|1,82574|1) - blend structure results unintended anchor and break stream concept, needed to fix after rearrangement.

  3. missing note at 01:21:886?

  4. vocal doubles are also not-well done:
    4-1. 01:20:949 - 01:21:011, 01:28:949 - 01:29:011, etc... , can be double trill for those notes
    4-2. 01:28:699 (88699|1,88699|3) - there isn't any vocal but double. also consisting uncomfortable anchor at 01:28:699 (88699|1,88824|1,88949|1) -
    4-3. 01:29:074 - 01:29:574, no doubt for 01:29:074 (89074|5,89199|5,89324|5) - those anchor however those streams structure can be improved like this:

Conclusion, please make sure those chord and stream rules. Current pattern doesn't seem good and you can improve more than now, suggest rework those parts with your clear progress intention.

permalink

Thank you for your advices!! I rearranged all the parts you highlighted and hopefully they're more consistent than how they were before, i tried following the single anchor rule (like on 01:20:324 (80324|3,80449|3,80824|2,80949|2)). Also for point No. 3. The missing note is intended because i didn't wanna connect the stream with the doubles for the kicks here 01:21:949 (81949|3,81949|4,82011|2,82011|1), 01:23:949 (83949|4,83949|3,84011|1,84011|2) etc...

Please tell me if i still need to make changes to these parts :P

permalink
Marked as resolved by KenFedex

forgot to say: for point 4-1. i don't like the idea of using double trills for the vocals, it would just raise the difficulty by a lot and i don't think there's enough space to fit double trills without making some uncomfortable anchors so i'll just leave them as singles :3

permalink

in 00:08:074 - 00:14:074 1/4 trillstream pattern looks like beautiful, however, in 6K playing moment, it is undoubtedly big spikes for players.
I think current pattern isn't suitable to place with bracket trill instead of stream at the start of music, it is extremely hard to deal those patterns (00:08:074 (8074|0,8136|2,8199|0,8261|2) (one handtrill) -> 00:08:324 (8324|1,8386|3,8449|1,8511|3) (middle finger bracket with other hands) -> 00:08:574 (8574|2,8636|4,8699|2,8761|4) -> 00:08:824 (8824|3,8886|5,8949|3,9011|5) (move with bracket to one handtrill)). IMO, you can disperse those trills with simple stream instead, it is enough to emphasize streams those sounds cuz of fast BPM.

this is one of my example:

permalink

didn't really know what to do w this part lol. Thanks for the cool suggestion, applied

permalink
Marked as resolved by KenFedex

I think you might underestimate how much tricky patterns raise the difficulty at this bpm.

For example, intro feels more intense than section starting at 00:32:074 due to trills and that contradicts the song. 03:16:074 is also a big diffspike because of the anchors.

Sometimes you arrange the pattern differently in the same section and it becomes notably more difficult which is bad for the flow. For example, 01:20:074 vs 01:28:324. Additional 5-6-5 trill and a bit more dense brackets make the latter feel more intense for no reason.

In general, try to always keep in check amount of tricky patterns like brackets, anchors, trills, jacks, etc. When you raise it, your map becomes more intense. This effect scales with tempo, so high BPM maps need a much stronger regulation.

permalink

Thank you so much for the feedback!!! I will explain why i used certain patterns and some modifications i will do:

00:16:073 ~ 00:31:824 i made this section with the intention of it being a more "technical" part compared to others. This part has a lot of stuttering sounds/vocals so i would like to mostly keep it as it is (but still i will do some changes to maybe nerf it a lil), i can defenitely understand this being harder than 00:32:074.

01:28:074 - this part has a drum pattern going on in the background (01:28:449 (88449|1,88449|5,88699|4,88699|3) - for example these are for the drums) so i didn't wanna make it the same as 01:20:074. Will definitely look for annoying anchors tho!

Just wanna say that 03:16:074 (196074|5,196074|0,196074|3,196074|4,196136|2,196199|0,196261|4,196324|1,196324|5,196324|0,196324|2,196386|3,196449|5,196511|1,196574|5,196574|0,196574|3,196574|4,196636|2,196699|0,196761|4,196824|0,196824|5,196824|2,196824|1) - i made this pattern with the intentional focus on anchors because it's one of the more important parts of the drop and i wanted it to be more highlighted, i used this pattern in other occasions where this exact same sound can be heard (here 03:18:074 - 03:20:074 - 03:24:324 - 03:26:074 - 03:32:074 (from here i used a different pattern but still with anchors) - 03:34:074 - 03:36:074)

I'll try to rearrange some patterns and make them more consistent and hopefully get rid of unwanted anchors (also gonna leave this open for now), thanks again for the feedback :P

permalink

gonna resolve this even tho ima make a lot of changes in the future. [img]https://gyazo.com/f2a7a3bf12716ee4030f28aa9897256c[/img]

permalink
Marked as resolved by KenFedex

oops wtf

permalink
/