Good luck to me tomorrow (TV Size)

00:13:115 (13115|2,13115|3) - for pitch clearance, move 3,4 col to 1,2 col

00:19:024 - можно добавить лн на 4 колонку до белой линии

00:19:251 - на 4 колонку можно добавить ноту, для выражения кика

00:25:729 to 00:26:524 - This is a bass section, a single instrument, so I think the pattern or note type choice should be one to match the consistency of the song

I'd suggest to map those as long notes or single notes only

00:26:070 (26070|0) - for guitar solo appearance part, make this single to 1/4 LN

00:29:933 - стоит убрать с 4 колонки ноту, она не стоит ни гроша!

00:31:865 - тут стоит поставить ноту т.к. стримы идут когда вокалист чё-то издаёт ртом, а на этом моменте прервалось немного

00:31:979 - я бы на 2 колонку поставил лн, т.к. на подобном моменте 00:28:342 - стоит лн

00:32:206 - лишняя нота на этой красной полосочке

00:34:706 (34706|2,34706|0,34820|1,34933|0,35047|1,35160|3,35160|2,35274|1) Felt a bit weird to play specially because of that 3 note anchor at the blue ticks which may have been unintentionally mapped here
It felt like a sudden transition between streams and then trills, for a part that doesn't emphasize much the "density" of the instruments (Or at least that's what I could see in this section) - I would recommend to rearrange this pattern accomodating notes in order to avoid those trills that feel out of place

But just in case if this is intentional I'd like to hear the justification

00:46:297 - может стоит добавить вторую ноту куда-то на эту линию, довольно пенящий вокал как по мне

00:53:683 - стоит убрать тут ноту, т.к. по сути пустота + сликшом сложный по кпс и технике парт получается

00:54:365 - 00:54:592 are in the same intensity scale, unlike drums where you placed doubles - I think applying single notes for both would be more accurate

00:55:615 to 00:57:433 Some cymbals and kicks were represented with different type of pattern
Sometimes cymbals were represented as singles, and then with doubles
Same goes for kicks

I have a rearragement suggestion to catch up the consistency issue; https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19506798/9dd9
I followed up the cymbal as double according to your mapping choice here 00:56:070 and kicks as single notes
But if that wasn't what you tried to represent then you can switch the pattern choice in here

00:57:433 In the "drop"/"chorus" I think the same thing happens as of 00:19:251 or 00:28:342 - The note representation of the mixture in instruments while a verse is playing is pretty confusing to me - It looks very inconsistent because you decide to firstly apply a vocal focus in terms of long note but then you follow up the trumpet

00:57:433 (57433|3,57547|2) Was represented with long notes
00:58:456 (58456|1,58570|2,58683|3,58797|0,58910|3,59024|2,59138|1) But what about these?

00:58:001 (58001|3,58229|2) - (and similars) I think they can go in the same column at 1/4 snap, same sound with the same PR
00:59:251 (59251|3,59365|3) - (optional) as well as these anchors, I think you could also apply it to other vocal melody sections, e.g here 00:58:570 -
01:02:433 (62433|3,62547|0,63001|3,63115|0) - I think you could change them around, since the pitch is different
01:07:433 - missing LN for vocal
(there are some mods in Russian with the same timestamps so if there is something repeated, let me know pls u.u)

00:59:251 - 01:04:706 - сильный перегруз на 1 колонке, вторая пустует, стоит разверенуть стримы как-то

01:06:751 (66751|3) - vocal + guitar for 1/4 LN

01:08:115 (68115|3,68115|1,68229|2,68229|0) I don't think this type of pattern suit vocal or bass sounds - And specially because your main concept was long notes, not doubles

01:12:774 "Ku" which is still audible imo, should be considered too as a single note

01:13:115 (73115|2,73229|1) This part should actually correspond to a single note, not a 1/4 grace

01:13:683 Missing note of percussion

01:16:183 - as last part of the song, a bass guitar stand outs of the song.
recommend mapping Long notes for bass guitar rather than vocal
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19494822/b61c

01:17:547 Ghost note (No instrument playing) and missing note 01:17:774 because of percussion
01:18:229 (78229|1,78229|0) I'd recommend to reconsider this double (Maybe a single suits better for this quiet sound) (01:21:865 Same)

The same thing happens with these two 01:21:183 (81183|0,81410|3) - (editado)

01:18:456 - 01:18:683 - 01:22:092 - 01:22:320 - missing notes for percussion

01:28:342 It would be acceptable as a triple if this included a biiig cymbal but it's the same sound and has the same intensity as the previous doubles