Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
beatmap discussion
discussion

Gokuraku Jodo

GARNiDELiA

3.25
iRedi's Oni
1.20
Kantan
2.03
Futsuu
2.76
Muzukashii
3.25
iRedi's Oni guest difficulty by iRedi
4.99
Inner Oni
Filter by user
Everyone
Kin
Nostril
Ryxliee
Mine
0
Notes
1
Resolved
8
Pending
0
Praises
6
All
15
Guest difficulty by iRedi
3:32
131
920
4
mapped by Nostril
submitted
ranked
Beatmap Page
This beatmap was ranked on 23 March 2025!
nominated by Kin and Ryxliee
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Timestamp
ctrl-c in edit mode and paste in your message to add a timestamp!
PraiseSuggestionProblem
Discussions
Sort by
Ryxliee

01:50:256 -> 01:49:912 and remove 01:50:485 to be consistent with 00:50:828

current improve feels out of place and doesn't follow anything, but other duplets in a map was used for blue tick vocals

permalink
Ryxliee

also consider moving 01:46:821 01:50:485 01:54:149 to follow held vocals with triplets and be consistent with section at 00:46:248

Last edited by Ryxliee .
permalink
iRedi

i want to keep for variation tho... these 2 sections are far away as well

Last edited by iRedi .
permalink
iRedi

01:49:454 (51,52,53,54) - is following vocals
01:50:141 (55,56) - is the blue tick eletronic + vocals, same goes for 01:46:821 01:50:485 01:54:149 they're all consistent

Last edited by iRedi .
permalink
iRedi

a

permalink
Marked as resolved by iRedi
Ryxliee

01:49:902 - at least add note here cause this 3/4 gap ruinning the flow, it will catch held vocals as well

permalink
Reopened by Ryxliee
iRedi

ok nostril apply for me

permalink
iRedi

add kat

permalink
Nostril

added

permalink
Marked as resolved by Nostril
Ryxliee

02:00:103 -> 01:59:988
02:12:011 -> 02:12:011

similar to #4870386 duplets here feels off cause they doesn't follow blue tick vocals as other duplets in all kiai sections

permalink
iRedi

same thing, 01:59:874 has vocal, and the 02:00:103 is an improv as variation from other kiai

permalink
Marked as resolved by iRedi
iRedi

not to mention its literally the same type of improv as 02:01:591 (14,15,16,17) - 01:02:966 (15,16,17,18) - etc

permalink
iRedi

my intention with this diff in general is to maximize variation so i think its ok

Last edited by iRedi .
permalink
Ryxliee

02:29:149 - sound here is really subtle so consider remove this note, cause actual snapping here is 1/5, not 1/3

permalink
iRedi

will delete

permalink
Marked as resolved by iRedi
Nostril

updated

permalink
Kin

02:29:759 - how about having the triplet starting here instead of here 02:29:988 - ? Since it's a decrescendo, having the triplet earlier kinda represent the music more accurately

permalink
iRedi

yeah your suggestion works but I want to keep it as 02:29:759 (122,123) - can represent the 1/2 drum here, the rhythm is focusing more on the drum, as 02:29:988 is an improv that fills the vacant part with no 1/2 drum

permalink
Marked as resolved by iRedi
/