00:52:667 (1,2,3) - nerf this 00:52:667 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - to make an actual gradual increase like 00:54:304 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - you do after
01:00:372 (2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - since you always use circular shape stream on this section maybe using a different one for these snare could be nice to make them stand out from the other pattern . (it applies everywhere with this type of snare)
i think i'll keep it like that since i always use circular shapes on 01:00:304 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - and all of the similar patterns
01:01:394 (1) - I don't really get what you are ncing on this section tbh, since you seems to follow the guitar on this section usually it rly dosen't make sense to nc on the snare here. From what i see with 01:01:394 (1) - on this slider or 01:03:031 (1) - 01:03:576 (1) - or this stream the ncing that would make the more sense could be 01:01:940 (1) - nc 01:02:485 (1) - nc https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19448723/3336 to follow the guitar the same way as you do after.
01:03:304 (5,6,7,8) - 01:07:122 (5) - decel here for the guitar pitch
01:05:485 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5) - I think this stream entrance is rly rly hard to take, espicially with how confortable the other stream are since you need to kinda flow from up to down 2 times it make the stream rly hard for not that much happening in the song.
If you keep the 2 slider before you can go for an entrance like that https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19448712/080d i think
01:22:394 (1,2,3) - this should be the most spaced I think, its where the sound is the most intense imo, 01:21:849 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - just make them increase progressively to then decrease on 01:22:667 (1) - them.
01:23:485 (2) - Uh i don't think making full deathstream without any change is a good idea here tbh, mainly because 01:10:394 (2) - 01:18:849 (1) - you never mapped like that and also because 05:18:849 (1) - it would be cooler to keep the full nonnc stream for the big scream imo. 01:23:485 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41) - this melody is basically the same as 01:19:122 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this so i would say maybe just map it the same (emphasize the same sound but with different shape if you want)
Same melody but not the same thing happening on the drums (idk how to explain it i'm not a drummer) if you hear the two sections they have the same melody, but it's not what i'm mapping here anyway, if you get what i'm saying you'll understand
01:10:394 (2) - 01:18:849 (1) - is the same as 01:23:485 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41) - too so yeah i'm keeping it like that
01:49:122 (1,2,3,4) - pure suggestion but making this decrease could be nice to then have a big stream on 01:49:394 (1) - this
i don't think it would make sense since the song here is increasing in intensity right before 01:49:394 (1) -
01:58:394 (2) - #4748017 same as this but i don't think you should follow differently the melody on the same section because its make the whole section kinda messy since we don't really know what you are trying to follow 01:54:031 (2) - on this stream you clearly cut 01:54:849 (1) - this melody with a decrease after a kick , 01:56:690 (4) - here you go for a increasing spacing 01:57:031 (1) - with direction change 01:58:394 (2) - and you here you go for full deathstream 02:00:304 (1) - and only change for the voices. I think it would be better to have a consistent way of following the melody on this section. (choose one of the 3 option you did preivously)
Kinda agree since i only mapped it like this here, i'll see what i can do for it to be more understandable tonight
03:02:690 (4) - why is this note hs muted ?? (ig its because of the hs you copyed and the original had a sliderend that was muted, just put normal hs volume lol)