Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
beatmap discussion
discussion

ReI (Cut Ver.)

THE ORAL CIGARETTES

4.96
Insane
1.82
Kagamine Rin's Easy guest difficulty by [Kagamine Rin]
2.48
muya-'s Normal guest difficulty by muya-
3.82
Hard
4.96
Insane
2
5.04
Another
6.03
Expert
6.18
dzeko's Extra guest difficulty by dzeko
6.64
ReMiniscence
4
Filter by user
Everyone
ItsALive
kodokawai
Leomine
muya-
Nidasimno
oNeko
Passionate
pearls
sanairrt
Share
Shiyzo
Stario
sydnmc
Mine
0
Notes
0
Resolved
10
Pending
3
Praises
12
All
26
1:54
186
232
155
mapped by pearls
submitted
last updated
Beatmap Page
Hype Train12 / 5
Nomination Status0 / 2
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Timestamp
ctrl-c in edit mode and paste in your message to add a timestamp!
PraiseSuggestionProblem
Discussions
Sort by
sydnmc

(l) 00:39:817 (1,2) - flow here feels really off because of how close these sliderheads are, would play much better if you ctrl + g 00:40:140 (2) imo ^-^

permalink
pearls

d, also ctrl + g'd the one at 00:34:979 (2)

permalink
Marked as resolved by pearls
sydnmc

(l) 00:54:011 (1) - minor, but would be nice if this were angled better to fit the rest of the map + blanket 00:53:688 (3) as well >.<

Last edited by sydnmc .
permalink
sydnmc

(l) 00:55:301 (1) - also similar, but the flow on 00:56:108 (2,3,4) feels really awkward too, so a pattern like this might fit better

permalink
pearls

ehhhhh i don't really see it for the first one

i did change the second one slightly to blanket 3, but still kept the original flow (it feels fine to me)

permalink
Marked as resolved by pearls
Passionate

01:13:366 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - this being spaced the same as the previous section is very underwhelming when you consider that this is picking up in pace. I suggest making this more spaced and specifically spacing 01:13:366 (1,1) - away to emphasize the strong kicks happening

permalink
Shiyzo

01:14:656 (6,7) - by removing these you give more emphasis to 01:14:334 (4,5) - which personally for me works better since 01:14:575 - to 01:14:817 - calls for a break anyway.
you could then stack 1 and 5 for better emphasis, move 01:14:979 (2) - further away etc.

permalink
pearls

me personally i think that keeping the tri-note burst here would be better because the drum sounds are audible here but i do agree that removing the burst and stacking 1 with 5 give the part more emphasis

main problem is that there's no feasible way to implement the stacking of 1 and 5 without needing to remap a lot of the surrounding notes

Last edited by pearls .
permalink
pearls

last time stamp does make sense though

marking this as resolved until further notice

permalink
Marked as resolved by pearls
muya-

01:15:301 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - should definitely nerf, maybe make a quint -> reverse slider or 2 kick sliders

Last edited by muya- .
permalink
pearls

d

permalink
Marked as resolved by pearls
sydnmc

(l) 01:34:979 (10,11,12) - would be really cool if you curved these sliders to the stream shape, maybe something like this :O

permalink
pearls

okay wait this is actually sorta cool, but idk how to apply for #4794419 while having this sort of slider shape without the flow being messed up

permalink
sydnmc

(l) don’t need to keep that if you changed more stuff here, it’s a completely different pattern so applying that wouldn’t make sense~

permalink
Passionate

01:35:301 (11) - you could flip this to show emphasis for the vocal change

permalink
pearls

done in next update

permalink
Marked as resolved by pearls
/