mapped by pastelliano
submitted
last updated
Hype Train7 / 5
Nomination Status0 / 2
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

Tu poderia mover 00:03:304 pra 00:03:018 e deletar 00:03:447, destacaria melhor o som em 00:03:018 e diminuiria um pouco a densidade.

permalink

yes

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

00:04:018 (4) I suggest that you turn this into don to emphasize more the following kat, which represents the melody, and also turning this 00:04:732 (8) into kat for the same reason

permalink

dsvbhdsfgdsfdfs

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

00:04:018 - move to 00:04:304 -
00:04:590 - move to 00:04:875 - and add a note on 00:05:018 -
to make it consistent with 00:08:018 ~ 00:09:875 -

permalink

f

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

00:05:018 - 00:06:590 - Que tal deletar essas pra também dar uma leve baixada na densidade e destacar melhor o som das notas ao redor?

permalink

yes

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

00:18:447 (40,41,42,43) - why is this 1/3? It doesn't follow anything and it's the only time you use 1/3 throughout the whole map. I'd suggest you delete 00:18:637 (41,42), put a k at 00:18:732 and make 00:18:161 (39) - a d (plays better imo but optional)

permalink

d

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

00:21:304 (53,54,55,56,57,58) - I think it would be better if you put it one 1/2 tick after as it would follow the song more accurately imo. If you do that, you could also move 00:22:447 (59) - 00:22:447 (59) and delete 00:22:875 (61) - to make this whole bar less straining

permalink

0 clue wtf you mean by this

permalink

permalink

ohhhhhhhhhhh smart

permalink

df

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

00:21:447 - could move it to 00:21:732 - becuz you mapped a similar sound on 00:12:590 -

permalink

fed

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

I don't think this works 00:26:161 (77,78,79,80). I would just do a quintuplet from here 00:26:161 to here 00:26:732, maybe kdkkd, so that the dons can represent the bass well.

Same here 00:35:304 (121,122,123,124), in this case dkddk would fit better (for the same reason as kdkkd before)

permalink

dfghgdhdgh

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

00:27:590 (85) Turn into kat to follow the snare properly? If you do, turn this 00:28:161 (89) into don to make the pattern better

permalink

g

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

00:28:447 - remove to make it consistent with 00:10:161 -

permalink

remvd

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

maybe move 00:36:018 (125) - to 00:35:875 to follow the kick??? It doesn't follow anything rn

permalink

df

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

00:36:644 - at least add don for muzu's 5-streak at 00:36:501 (120,121,122,123,124)

permalink

sfddfxc

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

additionally, remove 00:43:501 (128) for muzu.

permalink
Reopened by fuwamoco

01:00:358 (203) - i'd remove for nice 5-1-3-1-5 pattern.

permalink

01:15:215 (276) - overpushed note i think, better remove

permalink

01:20:161 - could change to dkddK to emphasize the strong instrument on 01:20:732 -

permalink

dddd

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano

01:25:304 - could make the spinner end on 01:27:590 to make it consistent with K and F

permalink

d

permalink
Marked as resolved by pastelliano
/