00:13:126 (3,4) - Maybe just use a 1/4 slider here instead so 00:12:991 (1,2,3) - just plays as a triple and the sliderend gives emphasis to 00:13:261 (1) - the downbeat?
00:26:505 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Maybe NC like this instead to represent what the piano is doing and make the followpoints more clean?
00:54:343 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - thoughts about decreasing reversesliders by 1 1/8th tick? currently the chances of sliderbreaking here is like 90%
01:41:910 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - if you do end up changing them, this one should be decreased by a 1/8th tick aswell perhaps
00:56:775 (1,1) - is this 1/8 snap intentional or are you using the wrong SV or something i.e. 01:13:802 (2,1) - 01:18:126 (1,1) - 01:22:451 (3,1) - etc. are all snapped to 1/4
01:07:180 (2) - id remove a reverse because u gave a buffer for the others before this creating an expectation for the player