00:06:505 (2,3,4,5) - nc spam for 1/3? to differentiate from 00:08:397 (2,3,4,5,6) -
yep
00:08:599 (1,2) - why blue tick NC here?
fix
00:38:937 (7,1,2,3) - is that overlap intentional, imo it looks a bit out of place
00:54:343 (1) - maybe lets extend by 2 more reverses because the 1/1 gap seems rather odd
ok
01:15:356 (3,4) - broken stack
01:19:072 (6,1,1) - this is kinda reading hell, would suggest moving 01:19:207 (1,1) - further down to not be hidden under the sliderend
did smth
01:43:532 (2) - 1/8?