00:29:573 (1,3) - Could be a bit cleaner by rotating 00:29:573 (1) - a bit: https://i.imgur.com/q4q3Sjm.jpeg.
00:31:252 (8,1) - Would nerf spacing cause this is way higher than all the other instances like 00:32:940 (4,1), 00:34:815 (4,1), etc.
00:48:877 (2,3,4,1) - not sure if this is intentional but u have many parts on this map where u have new combo but with the same colors u might wanna relook at it
I think its fine then not sure most of the people use new combo colors for special sections, so if u want to leave it like this its cool too i liked it haha ( i will mark this as resolved)
01:07:073 (1,2) - Should Ctrl+G rhythm.
Right now you are grouping 01:07:260 (2,3,4) - as a pattern when 01:07:260 (2) - has a different sound from 01:07:635 (3,4) - .
So 01:07:073 (1,2) - should be Ctrl+G'd to reflect that.
01:09:885 (3,6) - Could consider cleaning this up if you are fixing #4638995 and moving stuff around.
Overlap clearly looks like you ran out of space - but this is not a big deal so it's fine too if you want to leave this as-is.
01:09:885 (3,4) - This is so hugely spaced (compared to everything else) after the fix, nerf please.
01:22:065 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - continuous patterning on this makes it feel out of place since section is mapped more calmly, would nerf the pattern a bit so its not so difficult to play compared to 01:23:940 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - which is same instruments anyways
01:27:502 (8,1) - Buff spacing for the cymbal crash?
01:25:627 (6,1) - Otherwise it doesn't compare well with when you increase spacing here for the downbeat
ok, moved a little bit more to the right whole pattern, and ctrl + g on this 01:27:698 (1) -
01:35:940 (4,5), 03:07:721 (5,6,7), 03:39:690 (6,7), 04:03:971 (4,5,6) - What if instead of using soft-hitwhistles here you instead used normal-hitnormals with volume decreases like what the song is doing i.e. 01:35:940 - 50% volume, 01:36:127 - 30% volume etc, could be cool.
01:36:135 (5) - 03:08:010 (7) - Should NC these.
The spacings into these things are 1/4s, so the difference between these and other 1/2 spacings should be highlighted.
02:14:565 (1) - maybe consider making this a curved/ straight slider on because compared to other iterations 02:10:815 (1) - 02:12:690 (1) - etc are straightforward to follow whereas this one is harder to play because of sharp movement
well i might disagree with that statement, since its not harder to play because of the sharp angle, more like harder to read (since the circle is intact on it, and it's not hard to move your cursor by 1mm to the right so you could have both slider ball interaction) , but i can do that straightforward to follow it
02:50:190 (1,2) - u could possibly make these stack so it looks like 02:51:502 (4,5,6) - is a follow up
my bad, yes it can, it compromises with this one too as of sound 02:58:635 (5) - exact same one
03:04:823 (6,1) - Spacing is too small considering how you have been trying to emphasise downbeats 02:51:698 (6,1) - 02:53:760 (5,1) - 03:01:073 (5,1) - etc. in earlier measures.
https://i.imgur.com/scmO3LF.jpeg is what I would do but you have to compromise having a small spacing for 03:04:823 (6) - , so yea.
03:12:690 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - pretty hard pattern compared to the others since you're using both the horizontal/vertical axis for this whereas your other patterns tend to only really use one. would nerf movement a bit
03:32:854 - Is this supposed to be mapped as a triplet with 03:32:760 (4,5) - ?
Not a big problem in itself - but then I noticed that not mapping this resulted in 03:34:635 (6,7,8) - 03:36:510 (6,7,8) - being mapped same way
(which normally you would have done placements differently for variation's sake?).
the first you have mentioned shouldn't imo to be mapped as a triplet since there was no cricket or smth sound on it? 03:34:635 (6,7,8) - this did had some of that cricket sound and this 03:36:510 (6,7,8) - doesn't so i'm gonna change that one to corolate others that didn't had any sound on it
04:42:690 (1,2,3) - Sounds better as 4 notes of 1/4 IMO and feels kinda out of place as the only instance of active 1/3
04:46:635 (3,1) - Either make these 1/2 or overlap like 04:50:385 (3,1) - .
Otherwise 04:46:635 (3,1) - would look pretty confusing when compared with 04:44:760 (3,1) - 04:46:635 (3,1) - .