Asymmetry (TV Size)

00:06:544 (1,2,3) - drums in song are in 1/6, i suggest changing rhythm to singular 1/6th reverse slider

00:06:610 (6) - nc this un nc this 00:06:783 (1) - for a cleaner look kinda look messy rn (i know this is giga subjective)

00:12:960 (3,4,5) - for trumpet: instead of just first two notes being lower spaced the entire pattern should be decceled in some simple way.

for example:

00:18:575 (1,2,3) - could have decreasing spacing on these to represent the pitch of the sounds here going down could also give more emphasis to 00:19:269 (1) -

00:23:084 (6) - circle + 1/2 slider to cover trumpet better?

00:23:538 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - you seem to map every 1-2 combo in same spacing, even if trumpet goes down.

i suggest you to slightly scale down 00:23:885 (1,2) and 00:24:232 (1,2)

00:23:538 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - sounds more like the melody is doing a 1-2-3-1-2-3 grouping and not 1-2-1-2-1-2

00:28:914 (1,2,3,4) - instead of entire 1/2 rhythm you could use 1/2 slider + circle + 1/2 slider for better trumpet emphasis.

i think something like that will fit with previous ideas

00:29:674 (5) - nc to highlight transition?

00:41:400 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - im not sure if songs support this long jumps

would suggest to make 00:41:747 (3) a 1/2 slider for better trumpet emphasis

00:42:093 (5) - nc?

00:49:897 (2,1) - to be consistent with rest of kiais, i would suggest to make 00:49:897 (2) slightly overlapping 00:50:244 (1), just like you did in rest of map

00:50:830 (2) - what do u think ab spacing this more considering it comes right after a strong downbeat on a snare methinks it should have a little more emphasis

00:52:498 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1) - this needs to nerf a lot more since the intensity is going down but the spacing is increasing for some reason, making stuff like 00:48:336 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2) - irrelevant since they have the same build-up and spacing.

00:59:608 (2,3) - this does not need to be a cross screen snap for this kind of intensity

00:59:674 (2,3) - what do u think about increasing spacing here this spacing is kinda small considering the surrounding spacing and this sections intensity

01:00:648 (5) - stack this on the slider-tail of 00:59:955 (3) would provide you with a nice variation of a jump becaues you're kind of spamming the same jump a bit too much

01:01:775 (2,3) - are oddly too far

make these closer to sliderend of 01:01:342 (1) for natural movement

01:02:209 (1,2,3,4) currently causes odd flow, ctrl-g on 01:02:556 (2,4) works well and supports your idea

01:02:209 muting the slider ends here feels kinda weirdge when its still relatively high intensity

01:03:662 (1,2) - vocals kinda die here yet spacing increases from the previous pattern prob make spacing more like u did here 01:02:622 (2,3) - i can give some examples on how mayhaps

01:04:290 (3,4) - id space these out tbh, no reason besides it feels better to me xd

soo up to you

01:06:718 (3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ziad i beg of u fix this visually b4 rank grats tho

01:06:870 - prob map the snare here

01:07:411 (5,6,7,8) - just put snare hs on these imo, reflects what the map is doing better + better feedback

01:07:477 (1,2,3,4) - u can remove nc here as this stream all covers the same sound

01:07:497 (6,8) - add claps, no reason to hitsound this differently from the rest of the stream when you mapped it as one stream

01:10:533 (1,2,3,4) - the start of the build-up and these jumps already made it seem like this is the most intense part of this section. Maybe start off with easier jumps and gradually increase the intensity here?

01:14:868 (2,3) - spacing getting lower here while vocals goes up feels kinda weird

01:15:041 (3,4) - i think this rhythm isnt really covering the song well, because you try to follow weaker vocal on

i think you should stick to rhythm like you did on 00:51:111 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7)

01:16:602 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - the musical intensity here is a lot less intense than 01:11:400 (5,6,7,1,2) yet you pattern it the exact same way with the up and down movement. Thoughts on patterning it a bit differently for 01:16:602 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2) so it doesnt really take that much emphasis away from 01:11:400 (5,6,7,1,2)?

01:20:830 (2) - wanna curve this a bit more so its a little more visually connected to 01:20:310 (1) -

01:21:978 (3,4) - the song doesnt call for this big/sharp of an emphasis, would induce more of a circular or softer movement.

01:22:671 (5,6,1,2) - nah this linear patterning dont work for such a high intensity section since it doesnt emphasize anything at all

01:24:232 (1,2) - triple

01:24:298 (4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - prob find something else to do here other than ctrl+h copypaste from 01:02:275

01:24:405 would remove kiai from here as song changes here to less intensive

01:25:008 - Slider tail unsnapped by -2.589 ms.

01:25:099 (3,4) you mapped these sounds as circles, so why wouldnt you do the same for 01:26:486 (3,4) or vice versa to map them as sliders to stay consistent