00:33:214 (1) - could move this to not overlap with 00:32:648 (6,7,8) - , seems a bit out of place but up to u
01:16:232 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - any reason to NC this all? I dont rlly see any significance in music change to warrent it, like how 01:18:497 (1,1,1) - I can understand each one being NC'd cuz the vocals are very prominant
oh both ncs are intentional actually, for 00:34:534 (1) - i simply wanted the extra emphasis and for 01:16:232 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - i wanted to signify the transition to the next musical section
i made all of 01:16:232 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - hitsounded w/ hitnormals so that they are emphasized similarly to 01:38:119 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - tho
this MAY be fine but 01:03:402 (1,1) - uses a different rhythm in the topdiff, may wanna double check as i cant really determine whats best here
01:16:232 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - looks better without nc spam imo, same for 01:38:968 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) -
i put 01:40:383 (1) - into a blanket but i don't really fancy blanketing the other two unfortunately :(