00:21:317 (1,2) - could u give a dash for consistent the same sounds/emphasize w/ 00:21:517 (2,3) - ?
01:28:717 (2) - I think this should get some movement since the intensity throughout 01:28:517 (1,2,3) are pretty similar.
true but I think it should be fine to keep as is, im afraid if it will be too sharp for the movement if I put antiflow after the 1/4 hdash 01:28:450 (8,1) -
01:30:650 (1,2) - Rhythm structure here seems a bit awkward. The earlier section which has lower pitched guitars as mainly 1/2 patterns, yet the higher pitched ones are replaced with sliders. I think going with the structure you had @ 01:29:583 (1,2,3,4) would be best.
02:20:783 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - think 1/4 hyper is too much when sound/music is going up + 02:22:917 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - u didnt make many hyper for buildup too.
So, 02:20:783 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - they prob can remove some hyper for better buildup honestly.
Also could remove 02:21:249 (8) - and 02:22:316 (8) - for consistent w/ the stream like 02:21:317 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - 02:22:384 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -
I will buff the build-up of 02:22:917 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) instead
02:21:249 (8) and 02:22:316 (8) - both of these hyperdash are for emphasizing the cymbal, on 02:21:317 (1) and 02:22:384 (1)
02:43:317 (2,3) - minor. Could u adjust them for aesthetics and 02:43:183 (1,2,3,4) - being a C-shape?