Diminitive

00:13:244 (13244|3,13391|6) - the contrast here gets a little muddled by 00:12:508 (12508|3,12655|6,12802|3,12949|6), might be better if you moved these two notes outwards by a column

00:16:479 (16479|1,16626|2,16773|3) - not too much of a fan of this transition as it's the only one here that's fully one-handed. would like if you arranged in a broader fashion instead

00:23:097 - would be nice if you flipped from here to 00:26:185 for gameplay variety, 00:22:655 (22655|7,22655|2) transitions into a flip pretty well

00:24:861 (24861|3,24861|2) - shouldn't this be [15] to be consistent with 00:19:567 (19567|0,19567|4)/00:21:332 (21332|0,21332|4)/00:23:097 (23097|0,23097|4)?

00:27:949 (27949|8,27949|9) - you could add a note on col2 to continue the downwards stair here, as the melody here is still loud enough to be represented as a triple imo

00:32:067 (32067|3,32214|6) - since you use gaps of 3 here you could move these two notes outwards to differentiate from 00:31:626 (31626|6,31773|3) as well as represent the way the kick is faded out here

00:34:567 (34567|6) - woulld like if this was moved to col8 to show the jumps in pitch between it and 00:35:302 (35302|5)

00:46:038 - imo would make the longjacks singles to reflect the low pass filter here

00:47:802 - shouldn't these be LNs like Hyper

00:51:332 (51332|6,51332|5) - this is the only double here without a 4 width double, you could argue it's to show how the melody here isn't as loud but then it would be inconsistent with 00:54:861 (54861|2,54861|6)

For the record i'm fine with this i just want to make sure it's intentional

01:17:214 - imo could have better pr, what about something like 6 10 7 8 9 7 6 10 8 9 6? (see image below)

can understand if the issue is it's a bit too finger controlly but at the very least i think that 01:17:361 (77361|6) should be on col10 instead

in line with the previous mod, 01:18:244 (78244|9) is the only time you map a softer piano note here as you omit it in places like 01:19:126 and 01:20:597. Consider removing this one or adding notes to all piano?

01:24:567 (84567|4,84861|4) - this pattern sticks out a little but I don't hear any support from the song for a mini-anchor like this, maybe move the first note to the left? closest thing i can tell this might be representing is that 01:24:420 (84420|0,84861|4) is the same pitch but then they should be the anchor instead

01:30:155 - pretty confident this should be an identical copy of 01:16:038

01:52:655 (112655|8,113096|8,113537|8) - not too much of a fan of this, would move 01:52:655 (112655|8,112655|7) to the left

02:05:449 - this 808 is different from at 02:04:567 so the jacks should change column to show that