mapped by the blue frawog
submitted
ranked
This beatmap was ranked on 17 February 2025!
nominated by Monoseul and Antalf
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:42:023 (42023|3,42023|2,42023|0) - Shouldn't this be a double?

permalink

done

permalink
Marked as resolved by the blue frawog

00:43:407 (43407|2,43407|3,43407|0,43638|1,43638|3) - Flip the emphasis here, double on beat 1 and triple on beat 2

00:43:869 (43869|3,43869|1,43869|0,44100|1,44100|0) - Same

permalink

done i think

permalink
Marked as resolved by the blue frawog

00:44:157 - 00:44:273 I think there should be a ghost note here.

permalink

unsure what u mean by ghost note but i did notice i missed a 1/4 kick sound there

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

00:44:330 - to 00:59:100 - Rethink your whole structure here cause LNs come in randomly with no rhyme or reason if one measure will have LNs or not. Either use LNs on every 1/2 tick or not at all

permalink

done i think

permalink
Marked as resolved by the blue frawog

00:47:792 (47792|3) - moved to column 1

IMO I thought it would keep the player from getting confused when pressing the next note.

permalink

cant speak for every player around this level but i feel like itd probably be readable considering this is a calmer part map-wise

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

00:57:138 (57138|2) - turn this note into a double since there's a kick here

permalink

added

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

00:57:600 why is there just a random stop here? imo just place a note like 00:57:600 (57600|0) - cuz it doesn't rlly make sense for it to just randomly stop

permalink

probably an accident

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

00:58:984 (58984|1) - moved to column 1
Because there shouldn't be any anchor notes here. >>> 00:58:869 (58869|1,58984|1,59100|1) -

permalink

added

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

00:59:100 - Make double for crash

permalink

done

permalink
Marked as resolved by the blue frawog

01:00:023 (60023|3,60023|0,60254|2) - Flip emphasis, put double where the single is cause piano

permalink

done i think

permalink
Marked as resolved by the blue frawog

done

permalink
Marked as resolved by the blue frawog

01:03:254 (63254|1) - I would like to ask the opinions of owners of this difficulty level. Why is the space left like that?

I recommend trying doing this. >> https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18955278/cbc0

Or try changing to a new position.

permalink

i'll keep for pr reasons, feel like it being on column 2 represents the pitch better than the screenshot, i dont think the closer release should be much of an issue for someone at this level either

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:07:061 (67061|1,67177|1,67292|1,67292|0,67407|0,67523|0,67984|0,68100|0,68215|0) - I think the anchor notes are a bit too much. Can you try changing it? ;w;

permalink

fixe d

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:26:677 (86677|0) - moved to col 2 Because I don't want there to be an anchor note here.

permalink

01:26:907 (86907|2,87138|1) - same.
01:27:369 (87369|3) -
You try moving your position a little more.

permalink

doubles felt a little too intense for this part imo so i figured anchors would b a better choice, i use doubles later on at 02:18:254

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:26:677 (86677|0) - imo make this into a double/triple, i think either would work fine

permalink
permalink

feel like i'd have to make the rest of the notes (01:26:907 (86907|2,86907|2,87138|1,87369|3,87600|0) ) doubles aswell which would be too much for the current intensity imo

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:26:677 (86677|0) - , 01:26:907 (86907|2) - 01:27:600 (87600|0) - , imo i'd turn these notes into just jumps instead of singles since the kicks here are pretty noticeable and it feels weird while playing to not have doubles here

permalink

imo doubles wouldn't match the intensity of that part, i feel like there isnt much going on there compared to 02:18:254 where there are doubles

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:35:792 there should probably be some 1/4 note streamy thingimajigs here imo

permalink

added

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:37:638 (97638|1) - moved to col 1 I think it's a bit difficult. It can be confusing for some players.

e.g. 01:37:407 (97407|1,97638|1,97754|1) -

permalink

tbf a similar thing was done at 01:13:407, i think it can stay

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:41:715 (101715|0,101830|0) - moved to col 2 I think it will make the notes easier to press and more beautiful.

permalink

i'll stick with the current, imo feels better on the 1st column than the 2nd

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:57:715 - 01:58:177
I would rethink this smol section here it feels really weird just having lns here on the vocals, especially with the other noticeable sounds in this part - flows really weird while playtesting

permalink

adjusted

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:57:715 -> 01:58:119 i'd remap this section here a bit, since the lns here feel really awkward and out of place while playing

permalink

adjusted

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

01:59:907 (119907|2) - double here since you have a double for the same sound right before at 01:59:677

permalink

added

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

02:05:100 - 02:05:561

  • imo i would rethink this small part also as it just seems copy and pasted from the last drop, and the patterning here doesn't really fit me personally
permalink

i think it can stay, it's a pretty minor part

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

02:23:100 (143100|3) - moved to col 2 To avoid having too many anchor notes.

permalink

anchor felt fine here imo

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

02:35:792 There should be a triple notes here.
Because the sound is quite loud.

permalink

that was meant to give a sort of "cooling down" feel since the song also cools down right after that

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

02:35:792 (155792|2,155792|3) - why is this only a double when it is probably one of the most distinct sounds in the song? imo iot should definitely be a triple, feels wrong just having it as a double

permalink

had it there as a double to represent the song calming down there, i think a triple would be too intense

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

it feels just really wrong imo, the sound is so notable and distinct yet, its the same density as the same repetitive kicks throughout the whole song?

permalink
Reopened by the blue frawog

(late srry) still think the double would be too intense but i think a short ln would work

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

02:43:523 (163523|3) - moved to col 1 I think this should be easier to press Because the next note is ln.

permalink

added

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

02:52:754 (172754|2) - moved to col 4 I think it's worth avoiding anchor notes a bit.

permalink

again the anchor didnt rlly feel all that bad to me

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

same reason as #4493783

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

03:20:330 -> 03:22:177 imo i'd remap this small section here also as it felt super out of place while playtesting

permalink

playtested, didnt feel that outta place to me i think it can stay

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset

03:22:177 I think the ending should be a triple note or a quad note because the sound is quite loud.

permalink

na, the last sound isn't rlly all that loud to me i think the doubl can stay

permalink
Marked as resolved by _Reset
/