mapped by [Emiria]
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 16 September 2024 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

01:46:327 (106327|3) - This disproportionate consistency corresponds to notes that should be removed 01:00:062 -

01:45:695 (105695|6,105695|3,105785|1,105876|4,105876|3,105966|5,106056|2,106056|6,106056|0) -
00:59:430 (59430|3,59430|5,59520|4,59611|6,59611|0,59611|1,59701|2,59791|4) - and we should see that this structural consistency is ‘completely different’.
This confirms that the mappers were mapped randomly and not based on any structure.

In fact, I won't find any regularity in the stream patterns of most of the kiai parts.
I think the kiai part will mostly have to be a remake, so I'm going to mod it, preferably without the kiai part.

To solve these problems, mappers need to explain what sounds to follow and what they are mapping based on.
Does it im follw the rhythm of the vocals? Does it follow the pitch of the melody? Or is it following some other sound that I haven't noticed? have notes that you place in a colum that repeats on a specific sound?

permalink

01:02:050 (62050|5,62141|6,62231|5,62321|4,62412|3,62502|2,62593|3,62683|4,62773|5,62864|6,62954|5,63044|4,63135|5,63225|6) - What do these noticeable patterns mean?
These patterns are only for fun, not to match the song wiht fun.

It doesn't follow the pitch of the vocal, it doesn't take into account the stack and spread it out evenly, and it doesn't mix in some trills to give it a rhythmic feel, like the hat sound. At first glance, it seems to follow the above, but it doesn't maintain that consistency later on.

permalink

little changed on final of kiai

permalink
Marked as resolved by [Emiria]

00:17:683 - ~ 00:29:249 - I don't know what the mapper is using triple and quad based on.

I'm sure a lot of this has to change, but if I could make a guess based on analysing the current patterns as best I can, I'd say that quad should be used here at least.
00:20:936 -

permalink

so i still dont understand what u mean my logic is two note for base drum three notes for snare drum one note 00:18:315 (18315|3) - for this sound LNS for 00:18:587 (18587|0) - this sound

permalink
Marked as resolved by [Emiria]

01:06:840 - ~ 01:16:779 - The relationship between 4notes and 5notes present in 1/1 snap and 1/2snap is unclear.
you need to rebalance the density again.

permalink

mixed use one note for 'don' two notes for 'ta' two notes for piano , LN for 01:07:562 (67562|6) - this sound so i dont now what u said for

permalink
Marked as resolved by [Emiria]

there is some pattern in the final chorus (02:51:276 - and so on) that needs to be positioned better because some of the pattern ended up too heavy on one hand/ one column:
example:

  1. this pattern is too heavy on col6 03:05:914 (185914|2,186095|2,186276|2,186456|2,186637|2,186818|2,186999|2) - but can be fixed by move 02:55:523 (175523|5) - to col 3 and move 02:55:794 (175794|2) - to col 2 for better balancing,
  2. this pattern is too heavy on col5 and later a little on col3 02:59:227 (179227|4,179408|4,179589|4,179860|4,180041|4,180131|2,180221|4,180312|2,180493|2) - but can be fixed by swap/ctrl+h this notes 02:59:860 (179860|4,180493|2) -
  3. 03:03:565 (183565|6,183746|5,183746|6,183926|6,183926|5,183926|4,184107|5,184107|4,184288|4) - also not very pleasant to play, too heavy on right hand while 03:03:203 (183203|2,183384|2,183565|2,183836|2,184017|2,184197|2) - is too heavy on col 3, i suggest to do something like this to ease them up:
  4. 03:05:914 (185914|2,186095|2,186276|2,186456|2,186637|2,186818|2,186999|2) - also too heavy on col3, it really affects the playability there...
    here some adjustment that i did...
permalink

rerange this part

permalink
Marked as resolved by [Emiria]

same problems appear as well in the postlude (03:14:408 - )

  1. 03:16:125 (196125|4,196215|3,196306|4,196396|3,196486|4,196667|4,196848|3,196938|4,197029|3,197119|4,197209|3) - this part is quite unpleasant to play with due to the note position is jacked: i suggest to do something like this
  2. 03:18:836 (198836|4,199017|4,199197|4,199378|4,199559|4) - same issues as well, this time on col 5, i suggest to do something like this
permalink

reranged

permalink
Marked as resolved by [Emiria]
/