00:00:029 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this pattern may be too repetitive for newer players and could be tiresome to hit consistent 1/4. maybe include a 1/2 somewhere to break the long chain of 1/4?
01:11:472 (5) - song doesnt support this 1/4, could just remove this to be consistent with 01:11:163 (4,1)
Leaving this as is, there's a bass drum on the sliderend of 01:11:472 (5) and it's consistent elsewhere at like 00:17:039 (5,1), 01:21:369 (1,2)
02:45:802 (4) - slider end may be obstructed and not clear; to avoid any confusion, you could do something like this
I'd prefer to keep this one as is aesthetically, I don't think this half overlap is any more confusing than 02:50:750 (1,2) but i'm open to more opinions if people feel strongly :D
02:50:754 (1,2) - are less confusing because their slider ends are clear, with this slider, the slider body is covering the slider end so it may be unclear. why not just change it to where the slider body/end is obvious? It states in the RC for normal diffs states that: "Every slider must have a clear and visible path of movement to follow from start to end."
Sorry but I really think the sliderend for this one isn't a problem even with the partial overlap. The RC you shared with full context is for burai sliders and I don't think the path is ambiguous/not clear even for the normal diff audience (though I think the rc could be worded better?). If the sliderend lined up perfectly with the sliderbody at the center of the loop i'd agree! But currently going to leave this as is still D: