beatmap discussion
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Timestamp
ctrl-c in edit mode and paste in your message to add a timestamp!
PraiseSuggestionProblem
Discussions
Sort by
00:00:029
00:00:029 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this pattern may be too repetitive for newer players and could be tiresome to hit consistent 1/4. maybe include a 1/2 somewhere to break the long chain of 1/4?
00:12:404
00:12:404 (1,2,3,4,1) - this feels really forced, 00:12:404 (1) - should curve this downward and make use of the lower playfield instead
00:19:826
00:19:826 (1,2) - try a 1/2 slider?
u seem to use 1/4 slider + circle kinda frequently like 00:14:878 (1,2) - where the drum is somewhat strong.
Last edited by Firika .
00:47:971
Will leave this as is, it has the melody echo/sound on 00:48:280 and having it active makes it consistent with 00:52:610 (2,3,4) -
Marked as resolved by IWEJ
01:11:472
01:11:472 (5) - song doesnt support this 1/4, could just remove this to be consistent with 01:11:163 (4,1)
Leaving this as is, there's a bass drum on the sliderend of 01:11:472 (5) and it's consistent elsewhere at like 00:17:039 (5,1), 01:21:369 (1,2)
Marked as resolved by IWEJ
01:16:734
01:30:960
01:30:960 (4,5,1) - move these slightly to the left 01:30:342 (3,5) - are almost overlapping
01:41:476
01:41:476 (1,2,3) - 01:46:424 (2,3,4) - 01:51:373 (1,2,3) - could use a lower ds instead, the ds you are using to make 1/2 patterns spaced ended up make these really far
01:48:898
02:04:977
02:04:977 (1) - it looks like you mistake the distance snap. Both sides of this note have like 1.2x distance snap.
How about changing the distance snap to 1.2 like the other sides?
02:09:311
02:09:311 (2,3) - could try this instead https://i.imgur.com/ECVCCOZ.png, not really intuitive to make 02:09:311 (2,3) - a 3/4 gap with clickable on blue tick
Definitely see what you mean but would like to keep this for song emphasis like on the easy diff, the blue tick stuff is kinda repeated across the kiai at 02:04:981 (1,2,3) + sliderheads here give enough leniency to compensate i hope D:
Marked as resolved by IWEJ
02:10:703
02:10:703 (5) - maybe u can use different rhythm with 02:09:775 (3) - since the music representation should have more contrast.
try a 1/2 slider at 02:10:703 -
Last edited by Firika .
02:30:956
02:32:815
02:40:857
02:40:857
02:45:802
02:45:802 (4) - slider end may be obstructed and not clear; to avoid any confusion, you could do something like this
Last edited by Delta_ .
I'd prefer to keep this one as is aesthetically, I don't think this half overlap is any more confusing than 02:50:750 (1,2) but i'm open to more opinions if people feel strongly :D
Marked as resolved by IWEJ
02:50:754 (1,2) - are less confusing because their slider ends are clear, with this slider, the slider body is covering the slider end so it may be unclear. why not just change it to where the slider body/end is obvious? It states in the RC for normal diffs states that: "Every slider must have a clear and visible path of movement to follow from start to end."
Reopened by Delta_
Sorry but I really think the sliderend for this one isn't a problem even with the partial overlap. The RC you shared with full context is for burai sliders and I don't think the path is ambiguous/not clear even for the normal diff audience (though I think the rc could be worded better?). If the sliderend lined up perfectly with the sliderbody at the center of the loop i'd agree! But currently going to leave this as is still D:
Marked as resolved by IWEJ