Paedophilic Ultimatum mapped by Iraq‬ · beatmap discussion‬ | ‭osu!‬

beatmap discussion

0

mapped by Iraq

submitted 25 Jan 2023

last updated 8 Feb 2025

This beatmap wasn't updated since 8 February 2025 so it was graveyarded...

New Discussion

Please sign in to post or reply

Discussions

00:00:700

00:00:700 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - that feels more correct than in top diffs 8.9* and 9.3*

10 months ago

00:07:671

00:07:671 (2,3,4,5,6) - Honestly i would change the angle or atleast the placement of 6,
cuz at first glance it read as if 6 is 5 and 5 is 6

15 months ago

what

14 months ago

Marked as resolved by Sh4rq_

00:11:557

00:11:557 (1,2,3,4) - I feel like the background drum could be better represented with a change of the angle for this combo and closer spacing .

Maybe something like :

15 months ago

k

14 months ago

Marked as resolved by Sh4rq_

00:36:357

00:36:357 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,1) - I feel like the spacing could be more dynamic with those, maybe starting with a bigger DS and slowly decreasing it with combo next chain of note ? to better represent the backing with the drums and guitar ?

15 months ago

nah

14 months ago

Marked as resolved by Sh4rq_

00:37:042

00:37:042 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,1) - i suggest to make spacing lower to emphasize the guitar down pitch comparing to 00:36:357 (1,2,3,4,1,1,2,3,4,1) - previous high pitched one

10 months ago

nah I highlight the drums here so its fine

10 months ago

Marked as resolved by Sh4rq_

well, i don't think the suggestion is supposed to ruin your drum emphasis, but it's on your choice

10 months ago

00:40:122

00:40:122 (1,2,3,4,1) - seems odd to me that this grouping is singled out from other similar patterns in the section with 00:40:465 (1) - being by itself and not in between 00:40:122 (1,2,3,4) - like 00:38:408 (2,3,4,5,6) - 00:39:265 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 00:41:151 (1,2,3,4,1) - 00:42:179 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 00:46:208 (3,4,5,6,7) -

7 months ago

It's fine

6 months ago

Marked as resolved by Sh4rq_

00:43:385

00:43:385 (4) - nc this? it will make the emphasis on the object looks more intentional and to show the switch to 1/3 better too

13 months ago

sure

13 months ago

Marked as resolved by Sh4rq_

00:56:814

00:56:814 (1,2,3) - i would do sth different here cuz in the song the notes break the "pitch going down" pattern on 00:55:442 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) -

13 months ago

its fine rn

13 months ago

d

13 months ago

Marked as resolved by Sh4rq_

01:04:121

01:04:121 (1,2,3) - 1/3

7 months agoLast edited by -[Shady]- 7 months ago.

Sh4rq_ — Today at 2:03 PM
#4542159 you can fix it easy

7 months ago

Marked as resolved by Iraq

01:07:099

01:07:099 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - sick

15 months ago

/

›

›

›

›