mapped by stack92
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 2 June 2022 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:03:735 (4,1) - I'd nerf this spacing a tiny bit p.

permalink

it's all distance snapped so it should be alright in terms of spacing

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

00:14:985 (1,2,3) - ctrl+H on this to keep consistency with 00:12:641 (1,2,3,1,2,3) -

permalink

also im not sure why 00:15:219 (3) - is suddenly facing down, i think it would be better if you copy pasted 00:14:516 (1,2,3) - and ctrl+H on it

permalink

tried it out and liked it, thanks

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

00:19:438 (2,3,4) - imperfect stack, not sure if intentional.

permalink

oops fixed

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

00:21:782 (5) - This would flow better if it was ctrl g'd.

permalink

I like the suggestion, but personally i like how it feels currently

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

00:25:766 (4,1) - why not put nc on (4) instead?

permalink
permalink

yes

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

00:36:547 (1,2,3,4) - feels like you should just make this 1/4 sliders like having this 00:36:547 (1,2,3,4,5) - kinda undermines the emphasis on 00:35:610 (2,3,4,5,1) - cuz it removes the contrast

permalink

changed thanks

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

stack is very close to 00:41:235 (4) - . which means it doesn't look as clean as first intended. it's also visible in gameplay so yeah.

permalink

fixed, thanks

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

00:44:516 (1) - Looks heaps better to place nc on 00:44:750 (2) - instead imo.

permalink

or just b consistent with this section; 00:51:079 (1,1,1) -

permalink

yup, fixed

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

00:46:625 (7,1,2,3,4) - This part is supposed to be more intense in the song, but yet i don't r see any change in the map. maybe buff section a bit? ;D;D

permalink

spaced out more, thanks

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

00:46:860 (3,4,5,6,1) - Why is the spacing wider on 00:48:500 (1,2,3) - even though the sound is stronger here?

permalink

Yeah, they sound pretty much the same, so I made the spacing the same now as well.

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

00:47:797 (3) - could buff sv here. Or even just ctrl g'ing it would b better imo.

permalink

kept the lower sv since vocals are softer here

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

01:01:860 (5) - I feel like you would under normal circumstances nc this, like you did at all other streams?

permalink

fixed, thanks

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

01:03:266 (1,2,1,2) 01:10:766 (1,2,1,2) - why is this different compared to the rest of the "chiki chiki" parts like 00:55:766 (1,2,3,1,2,3) 00:10:766 (1,2,3,1,2,3) 00:12:641 (1,2,3,1,2,3) ? better to be consistent

permalink

good point, i used both types throughout the two kiai sections. In the first kiai, the first half was triples, the second half was sliders. so i changed 01:03:266 (1,2,3) - to be triples, but left 01:10:766 (1,2,1,2) - as is because it is in the second half. now it should be consistent across both kiai sections. thanks

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

01:20:375 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - this pattern feels too spaced because there isnt really any significant sound to justify it, id suggest nerfing it so its not spaced at all

permalink

fixed, nerfed the spacing

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92

01:26:704 (1) - ctrl G this to keep flow from stream

permalink

fixed

permalink
Marked as resolved by stack92
/