BLUE ARMY (Raytoly's Progressive Hardcore Sped Up Edit) mapped by riunosk‬ · beatmap discussion‬

from 00:45:454 - to 00:57:009 - i highly suggest to continue to continue to map the vocals, it felt really weird to not hit the vocal after the roll 00:45:454 -

22 months ago

i felt like the pattern would become too dense for a break section if i add vocals on top of the jacks.
need a third opinion on this one.

22 months agoLast edited by AL-E 22 months ago.

Leyna

For the difficulty this diff tries to archieve I think there is no real need to map those vocals because they would make the part significantly harder together with the drum-jacks.

22 months ago

thanks for the feedback @Leinadix - part remains untouched, marked as solved.

22 months ago

Marked as resolved by AL-E

02:30:676 (150676|3,150787|0) - if you mapped those you can't ignore the rest of this synth lol

02:30:509 - 02:30:954 - 02:31:121 - 02:31:232 -

22 months ago

forgot this 02:31:398 - and maybe you could add 02:31:509 - this snare too

22 months ago

those were actually meant to be vocals :O

this sections is supposed to be a mini-break before the final section.
i really don't want to make it any denser, given what follows.

22 months ago

Leyna

I would agree with Harbyter on focusing on the snyth and not the vocals. The notes play as if they are meant to represent the synth and not the vocals and therefore the other synth sounds should also be represented.

22 months ago

alright, i am convinced.
remapped to represent the synth instead of the vocalist... hope it plays alright.
marking this as solved.

22 months ago

Marked as resolved by AL-E

02:53:009 - i think you should stick up with the 1/2 doubles like you did with the previous pattern of the song

22 months ago

oh god, i was caught copy-pasting ;-;

fixed, marked as resolved.

22 months ago

Marked as resolved by AL-E

02:28:565 - same suggestion of the previous similar patterns

22 months ago

see #3749656/10051048

22 months ago

Marked as resolved by AL-E

02:58:787 - same suggestion of the doubles here

22 months ago

see #3749656/10051048

22 months ago

Marked as resolved by AL-E

01:29:121 - 01:29:343 - 01:29:565 - 01:29:787 - imo it doesn't hurt adding another note for those snare

22 months ago

my personal note on this:

i am trying to squeeze as much difficult out of minimal density, and the way i see it, densifiying the "mini-jacks" to jumpjacks would hardly increase difficulty.
being able to shift the single note in a 2-1 pattern also allows more variation.

unless someone else hardly disagrees on this, i am going to keep this pattern untouched.
marking this and all related mods as resolved.

22 months ago