1. Advanced (1,94 stars, 330 notes)
2. Dusk (3,55 stars, 454 notes)
3. Feru's 4K Harmless - 4Key (1,28 stars, 543 notes)
4. Feru's 4K Nightfall - 4Key (2,09 stars, 1002 notes)
5. Hard (2,97 stars, 394 notes)
6. Harmless 8K obj.Kamikaze - 8Key (1,31 stars, 613 notes)
7. Krfawy's Easy (1,28 stars, 164 notes)
8. Necrotic 8K obj.Kamikaze - 8Key (2,12 stars, 1174 notes)
9. Normal (1,53 stars, 249 notes)

osu! needs more 07th Expansion

Standard by me and based Krfawy

1. Dusk
2. Hard
3. Advanced
4. Normal
5. Krfawy's Easy

4K osu!mania by Feerum

1. Nightfall
2. Harmless

symmetrical 8K osu!mania obj.-Kamikaze-

1. Necrotic
2. Harmless

General Stuff

Song is featured on the 彼岸花の咲く夜に Original Soundtracks「常夜満たすは妖艶の花」 album (track 2)
http://ilustudio.web.fc2.com/tmyh/top.html
Source is actually only the 2nd Higanbana game so the Source reflects this (going by how it's being sold on amazon because the website doesn't write it out and i don't know how to read the image properly):
http://www.amazon.co.jp/07th-Expansion- ... B006Q9QZAI
http://www.fujimishobo.co.jp/sp/201011higanbana/ also supports the writing of my source
Took the .ogg from the game and converted it to a mp3

Source taken from here

Okoratu wrote:

uhh i don't think something X rated would fit the overall atmosphere of this song though

Krfawy wrote:

True. I am able to make a 6* o!s diff here, but why if it is such a beautiful song. \o3o/

VINXIS wrote:

hury krfwaryhy

so bored


how the fucjk do i mod this

Gnrl

➥ Girl??

1. ok dad

NM

1. uselss nazimod overconsistency shti thing thing
2. 00:46:786 (3) - u use a straight slidro here but not at 00:49:643 (3) - and 00:52:500 (3) - e.t.c y u do dis. u also put like straight sliders at that instance like 2 more times or smth d p sure it doesnt evn rlly matter but ya ➥ i don't think that matters at all

HD

1. 00:38:572 (4) - puttign it somewher like x321 y354 wud make it look lik the same spacing and lika straihgt line or smth and imo it looks cool lolz ➥ square.

EDit: Dusk

Dusk

1. just realized u have a useless timing point in the negative for every diff lolz ➥ still dunno if we need for mania or no, if no it die
2. 02:49:643 (3,4) - looked like the circle was 1/4 after and not 1/2 after idk ➥ dunno if i fixed that idk

NlHIL wrote:

Feru's 4K EZ

00:03:215 - add a note
00:26:072 - ^
00:37:500 - ^
00:53:215 - ^
01:46:072 - ^
01:57:500 - ^
02:24:643 - ^
03:01:786 - ^ No to all. Can't really understand this. I mean you mention this places but other not where the exactly same sound is but there i should not add? :/
03:02:143 - remove a note Yeah okay this one i do

Feru's 4K Nightfall

00:00:358 - 00:06:072 and... - add a note as 00:46:072 - 02:24:643 and... No to all. Sorry. At the first is the more calm part there i dont want to add more notes. Later they fit better

Feerum wrote:

NlHIL wrote:

Feru's 4K EZ

00:03:215 - add a note
00:26:072 - ^
00:37:500 - ^
00:53:215 - ^
01:46:072 - ^
01:57:500 - ^
02:24:643 - ^
03:01:786 - ^ No to all. Can't really understand this. I mean you mention this places but other not where the exactly same sound is but there i should not add? :/
03:02:143 - remove a note Yeah okay this one i do

Feru's 4K Nightfall

00:00:358 - 00:06:072 and... - add a note as 00:46:072 - 02:24:643 and... No to all. Sorry. At the first is the more calm part there i dont want to add more notes. Later they fit better

sankyuu Baka for the Mod <3

NlHIL wrote:

I mentioned adding some notes to these places but others not, where is the more calm part (I think you think)

I'm really baka. ;w;

1. everytime i listen to this song, i feel like that it is way more horror for me D:

1. 00:49:641 (4) - whistle at the last part of the slider

1. 00:13:927 (4,1) - idk if you want this one into blanket or not. if yes, it needs to improve a bit
2. 00:35:713 (2) - on my 800x600 view, it is almost touch the HP Bar. maybe lowering it a bit will do
3. 00:44:641 (3) - mind about aiming the slider end to 00:46:070 (1) - ?
4. 01:51:784 (1) - slider end needs whistle
5. 03:02:141 (4,5) - ctrl+g will do

1. nope

1. 00:21:784 (3) - in my 800x600 res view, this one almost touches the HP Bar. lower it a bit
2. 01:51:070 (5,1) - a little bit improvement for blanket

1. those jumpy patterns tho

Feerum wrote:

NlHIL wrote:

I mentioned adding some notes to these places but others not, where is the more calm part (I think you think)

I'm really baka. ;w;

You are the 1st one who reply my Modreply.. i don't really know what to do :c
Nah, jk, yeah you are baka but.. a cute one <3

[ Seni ] wrote:

Hi o/
Request from my queue.

I know you specifically asked me to mod easy but I just don't know how to approach such a difficulty or what to even do there. ๑•́ㅿ•̀๑) sorry, hope my mod still helps. ➥ dw

Dusk

00:00:236 (1,2) - This should be a 1/12 triple. Actually after looking through the whole map there are plenty of places where this is the case. I don't know if you already asked someone and they advised you against it or you just decided on your own. I don't know if it's possible, but in my opinion it's a big waste to not map such a nice song to the fullest. It would make for a unique and interesting map. ➥ Yes i know it's a 1/12 triplet but that would not only look like this but also it'd be like a triplet at 250+ bpm because 1/12 is actual bpm x 3 (4 times 3 is 12 amazing rite) so that would be sudden bursts of 252 bpm triplets, they would moreover not go well with the approach rate and immensely spike the difficulty, so simplifying it to an 1/6 doublet was the choice i deemed to fit best.
I actually tried the triplet, it just didn't work, more so for the very first elements of a 84 bpm diff it's kinda unexpected for about everyone who will play this.

00:23:094 (1,2) - Could move this further away since it's a start of the same part repeating. ➥ nice point, but that hurts the overall readability of this pattern because the rhythm already is something more or less complicated like this, as you can see the distance on the timeline is uneven, so i get why you suggest spacing to reflect that, but i don't think increasing it will make it better at all (and my playtests kinda confirm that) because you will end up having to move faster for 00:22:855 (4,1) - than you already have in order to hit the pattern, leading you to assume that this is somehow maybe 1/2 and not 1/3 distance on the timeline, causing you to hit 00:23:094 (1) - late.
I already tried having the distance from 00:22:855 (4,1) - a bit lower but that didn't work out the way it statisfies me either. so going for equally big looking spacing ended up working the best out of the 3 possibilities.
at least for me. I'll keep this in mind but i would like to have other opinions on this as well before i can make a fitting decision about this o/

00:27:141 (5) - Could move this away a bit further to make it easier to read that the circles aren't 1/4 anymore, but 1/2. Same for 00:38:570 (5) - 01:58:570 (5) - 02:09:998 (5) - 02:09:998 (5) - ➥ that's 100% intentional, because the section is completely identical to the first one where i do 00:17:498 (1,2,3) - stuff like this, 1/2 slider and 2 circles followed by more spacing for the other rhythm circle. Since it's always only in the 2nd section, I assume that people should be familiar with what rhythm it's going to be, so i thought placing them like this is more interesting than doing the same thing all over just recycling ideas. I also don't think it's gonna throw anyone off

00:29:463 (2,3,4) - You do that^ here nicely ➥ Explanation is above

02:23:927 (3,4) - Make this just as spaced as the other 1/2 jumps are ✔ nice idea, i also increased 00:52:498 (3,4) - because it's the same thing

02:58:927 (4,5) - This too. ➥ ehhh? i don't know why you suggest that, because it's literally the same kind of spacing as 02:57:498 (1,2,3) - , 02:59:284 (5,6) - is bigger to accentuate the sudden intensity change properly

Lastly, I don't think the spacing between those 1/2 jumps should vary so much since the music is pretty uniform with no call for change in spacing. ➥ what i often tried was grouping the same sounds, which most times are 2 sounds which then repeat all over as seen in 00:29:641 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5) - as you can see i grouped 2 circles together most times, and in order to do so it automatically creates jumps, basically my system to grouping objects, or mapping the same string of sounds with a buildup spacing pattern may make it seem a bit random at first glance but idk if it's worth to be changed because i kind of have reasons for most/all of these

Very nice map. gl

wat

Okoratu wrote:

Misc. info (if any): Idk are the first 3 things you wanna hear about each song that necessary because you literally get artist and title, as well as draintime by clicking the 4th thing you want to know o.o

I like telling people what to do :^) ➥ ok then :^)

Okoratu wrote:

oh yes i hope this doesn't make you as sleepy as me, the SB is not fully done yet, but i'll just assume that doesn't matter much since everything else is
one offset is negative because we don't know if we need it for the mania diffs or not

Modded this at 2:35 AM so yeah It got me a bit drowsy. ➥ as expected xD