It seems that the song audio file is not actually 192kbps if we compare the spectrums:
RC states the audio should not be encoded upwards from a lower bitrate.
I would recommend reusing the audio of an already existing spread which has the actual bitrate of 192 kbps:
Comparing 01:45:386 (2,3,4,5,6) (intensity decrease) with 01:54:986 (2,3,4,5,6) (intensity rise), feels like 01:45:386 (6) is accidentally emphasized through a non-circular (i.e., back-forth) movement + a higher space. I would recommend gradual spacing decrease in the former, and increase in the latter for further contrast enhancement (current angles don't really suffice imo).
03:34:436 (2) - 2 circles would fit better into the way you capture vocals (they are pretty strong)
00:43:736 - a sudden decrease in movement speed via SV feels a bit underwhelming given the strong instrument. Would increase SV for this slider. This suggestion helps illustrate the general issue 2311119#4824648
00:38:186 (2) - how about a circle + 1/4 slider to keep consistent with sliders starting on guitar?
I think both ways work because there is a slight "r" vocal on a blue tick. Regardless, because 01:27:405 (1,2,3) - are spaced by 3/4, I would prefer not to have a visually similar spacing between 01:28:151 (3,5) - which would be 1/2. I'd rather have it 1/4 to make it clearer.
But remapped the whole diff anyway