01:09:456 (69456|0,69515|1) - For player's tension control, this can be much faster. (1/9)

e.g)

03:06:926 - ~ 03:29:515 -
This is just a random idea, but I think it would be nice to use LNs to articulate the pitch progression of the melody synths.

This can also be a buildup play-wise for the vocal LNs at 03:29:515 - ~

e.g)

00:22:809 (22809|3,22838|2) - I think if u ctrl+h, then change it to start at col 4, u could represent the sound in the background as well with the vocal chop representation, rather than just flowing in one direction.

e.g)

00:10:456 (10456|3,10515|2,10573|1,10632|6,10691|5,10750|4) - I think 1/6 is rather fast as a buildup for this sound 00:10:809 (10809|2,10853|1,10897|0,10941|6,10985|5,11029|4,11073|3,11118|2) -, so consider 1/5

e.g)

01:22:103 (82103|0,82108|1,82114|2,82119|3,82125|4,82455|6,82461|5,82466|4,82472|3,82478|2) - very subjective, but this sound has more of an interruption meaning. So with that thought, Pitch progression can be represented not just visually as right and left, but also down for low notes and up for high notes

e.g)

02:40:985 (160985|0,160985|2,161073|0,161073|2,161338|1,161338|2,161426|1,161426|2) - The current representation is fine, but the synth texture is definitely different enough that it could have a completely different shape.

e.g.)

same 02:51:926 (171926|1,171926|2,172279|1,172279|2,172368|1,172368|2) - but 02:52:015 - Where did notes go lol

02:05:230 (125230|1,125230|2,126030|2,126030|1) - you used a double here and then using a single later but, the progression seems a little awkward visually. I'd rather suggest to remove these notes 02:05:230 (125230|1,126030|2) - to get some variety.

02:10:030 (130030|3,130030|2,130130|1,130230|3) I know you've been using symmetry motifs throughout this map, but this one sounds too different, so need some variety.

02:22:030 (142030|0,142030|3,142130|1,142230|3,142230|0) - same

00:37:630 (37630|1) - u probably moved it to col1 for the purpose of isolating transition from the previous pattern, but I think it's better to move it to col 0 again. The role of transition is already being worked by these notes 00:37:930 (37930|2,38030|1,38230|2) - imo

00:56:030 (56030|0,56130|1,56330|1,56430|0,56630|0,56930|0,56930|1,57130|0,57130|1,57330|0,57330|1) - This flow seems a bit difficult for a user playing on normal difficulty. 00:56:630 (56630|0) - Moving this note to col2 would solve it, also that makes sound separation better.

01:03:030 (63030|3) - same

01:10:430 - ~ 01:32:830 -

01:13:130 (73130|2,73130|3) - 01:16:330 (76330|2,76330|1) - 01:22:730 (82730|3,82730|0) - 01:25:930 (85930|2,85930|0) - 01:29:130 (89130|0,89130|3) -

Because the current flow is too hard for normal difficulty, turning these doubles into a single would lower the difficulty, and make the sound more consistent (since it's the only double that's not a laser synth u representing)

(Additional explanation: 01:12:630 - those doubles are actually the exact same sound here.)

00:06:330 (6330|2) - I think moving this note to col1 would make the transition feel more seperated.

01:18:830 (78830|1,78930|2,79030|1) - ctrl+H to relieve stress on the right hand

02:12:830 (132830|0) - The flow here is a bit strong and have a 3-stack anchor, so it might be better to remove this to simplify the kick to a single.

00:25:330 (25330|0) - This sound seems to be more effective in the right hand than consistently in the left, so move to col2?

00:39:830 (39830|1) - It's better to have a clear distinction than to have a continuous anchor flow imo

00:46:230 (46230|2) - same

01:20:030 (80030|2,80030|3,80030|0,80130|1,80230|2) - This pattern is too hard to use on hard difficulty. 01:20:030 (80030|2) - remove this to get rid of the triple at least.

01:26:430 (86430|1) - same

00:57:630 (57630|3,57630|0,57730|1,57830|2) - ctrl + H to relieve flow that is clustered in the left hand, also to separate sounds

01:04:030 (64030|3,64030|0,64130|2,64230|1) - same

01:21:030 (81030|0,81030|1) - I don't think you need to push it bit much in a one-handed flow, 01:21:030 (81030|0) - so it's better to move this to col2 imo.

01:27:430 (87430|3) - same

00:38:730 (38730|1,38830|2,38830|1,38930|1,39030|2,39130|2,39130|1,39230|0,39330|0) - This flow is a lot heavier than It should be, I'd rather suggest moving this 00:38:730 (38730|1) to col 2 - so might nerf the intensity a bit.

00:41:930 (41930|1) - 00:45:130 (45130|2) - same

00:02:930 (2930|0,2980|1,3030|0) - I don't think this intensity is appropriate for this sound, since it burys the intensity of the previous 1/4 minijack (00:02:030 (2030|1,2280|0,2380|0) - ). So, better to move this to 00:03:030 (3030|0) - col3.

00:09:430 (9430|3) - same

00:58:230 (58230|0,58230|1,58330|1,58355|0,58430|2,58430|1,58530|2,58555|1,58630|3,58730|2,58755|1,58830|2,58830|3,58930|3,58955|2) - Considering the difficulty gap with insane, this is way too heavy (esp, this 01:04:630 (64630|2,64730|2,64830|2,64830|1,64930|1,64955|2) - ). So, consider nerfing the intensity a bit like this.

e.g.)

01:04:630 (64630|2,64630|3,64730|2,64755|3,64830|2,64830|1,64930|1,64955|2,65030|0,65130|1,65155|2,65230|1,65230|0,65330|0,65355|1) - same

00:51:630 (51630|2,51630|3,51630|0,51630|1,51930|0,52230|1,52430|2,52530|3) - The gap is a too wide, so the intended effect isn't working properly. Consider tightening the gap.

01:20:830 (80830|3,80830|2,80930|3,81030|3,81030|2) - The drum beat is pretty clearly separated here, so 01:20:930 (80930|3) - it's better to move this to col 1.

01:27:330 (87330|0) - same

02:18:930 (138930|2,138930|3,138980|1,139030|3,139030|0,139130|2) - I think this flow should be similar to 02:18:130 (138130|0,138180|1,138230|0,138330|0) - for tension control. So, consider something like this.

Later pattern is done with CTRL+H for hand balance.

02:35:230 - ~ 02:37:380 - The ending flow is too weird sound-wise, so I suggest trying to fix it yourself.

The current issues are
02:35:530 (155530|1,155530|2,155830|1,155830|1,155830|2) - The drum that is supposed to represent the break between the synth sounds is connected by a 3 stack anchor, which makes the sound indistinguishable.

02:36:830 (156830|3,156830|2,156830|0,156830|1,156930|3,156930|1,156930|0,156930|2,157180|3,157230|2,157280|1,157330|0) - The buildup is quite weak, so this pattern feels very abrupt.

01:24:730 (84730|0) - If this is a note for a vocal, it might be better to move it to col 1 to be sure. Maybe it's to emphasize the abrupt flow of the vocals, but I feel like the separation is better. however it's your choice.

01:31:130 (91130|3) - same

01:12:030 (72030|0,72030|1,72130|2,72130|0,72180|3,72230|1,72330|2,72330|3,72380|1,72430|0,72430|2,72530|3,72530|2,72630|1,72630|0,72680|3,72830|2,72830|3,72930|1,72930|3,72980|0,73030|2,73130|1,73130|0,73180|2,73230|3,73230|1,73430|2,73430|0,73480|1) - In a similar fashion, you could use CTRL+H