05:16:611 (6,7,1) this flow is really awkward, something like this is a bit more appropriate, i just moved stuff around and rotated some stuff
06:26:040 (1) I'd use SV 2.0x here, it's kinda really small and slow rn, especially with how fast these 06:25:354 (1,1,1) are
02:10:011 (1,2) 02:11:382 (1,2) 06:22:354 (1,2) 06:23:725 (1,2) I would ctrl-g all of these. With how it plays right now, it's kinda a weird movement, when you ctrl g the second groups, they all snap a bit more and play a bit better imo
NCs I missed
02:32:554 (3)
01:55:183 (5)
01:55:525 (1)
01:58:268 (2)
I will be adding to this when I catch more
02:27:068 (1,2,1,2,3) 02:27:840 (1,1,1,2) There is no problem with either of these patterns I just think they need to be visually spaced a bit further so the player can easily grasp that there's a gap in the music here 02:27:754
Might just be able to move 02:27:840 (1) a bit further away from 02:27:583 (3) and be fine
03:03:068 (2,1) i wish this had more impact, lowkey could do something like this?
also idk if you realized but this slider 03:03:240 (1) is snapped weirdly, it's on 1/8 yellow tick, either stop it here 03:03:497 or here 03:03:540
03:04:697 (2,1,2) this flows atrociously at the moment, moving 03:04:868 (1) to x365 y0 is better, also gives 03:04:954 (2) some angular emphasis
this section is so freaking good but these all need significant spacing buffs 05:36:325 (1,2,3,4) 05:38:383 (1,2,3) 05:47:297 (1,2,3,1) 05:49:354 (1,2,3)
at least make them 02:04:440 (1,2) on the same axis
to fix: copy 02:04:611 (2) and paste to 02:04:440 then rotate 180 and scale to size