00:17:597 (3) - could be cool if this was a red anchor slider so it feels more similar to 00:14:972 (1,2) - and distinguishes itself from 00:19:472 (1,2) -

00:40:003 (4,5,6,1) - personally I find moving from the 4/5 stack into the 6 to be pretty awkward as a linear motion, especially having to snap down to the 1 again afterwards, maybe consider doing something like instead so the entire pattern forms one continuous flow?

(unless this is deliberately awkward, then ignore me)

00:43:472 (1) - unnecessary NC

01:02:409 (2) - an NC here would be nice to indicate that the 3/4 section is over

01:08:972 (1,1,1,1) - this is really sick

01:33:159 (2,3,4) - consider rotating this by 90 degrees clockwise? I feel like it makes the flow significantly nicer (something like )

00:13:472 (1,2,3) - I think unless you're deliberately trying to make this a reading trap alongside 00:14:034 (1,2,3) - it could be worth NC spamming on this so it's clear that these two patterns are rhythmically distinct

00:49:284 (5,6,7) - is this intentionally not spaced the same way as 00:48:628 (1,2,3,4) - LOL, if it is then ignore this, was just curious

00:55:659 (2) - would really strongly recommend either removing one of these reverses or moving this to a position where going to 00:56:034 (3) - is more reasonable, right now this is just asking for sliderbreaks

something I might suggest is like this maybe

01:28:284 (1) - unnecessary NC?

00:32:784 (1) - could move this ever so slightly towards the top-left so it blankets the 00:32:409 (6) -

00:43:847 (1) - could probs un-NC this one since the previous note is NC'd already

00:53:503 (1) - I think un-NC'ing this would help make the gap between 00:53:222 (2,1) - more obviously 1/4, right now I'd read it as 1/2 at first glance

01:17:315 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - wow this goes so hard

01:33:534 (5,6) - I think if you wanted these to hit harder you could even make them 1/8

01:38:222 (4) - feels a bit close to the 01:37:472 (3) ? I'd suggest moving it up more

00:48:534 (3,4,5,6,7) - this entire pattern just feels a little cramped, with the movement feeling far more constrained than other patterns around this section, I might suggest something like but there's definitely other ways to open this up if this isn't a deliberate design choice

01:22:659 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - I think having all of these change direction makes this far harder than it needs to be, IMO ctrl-g'ing 01:22:847 (1,2) - so that this entire pattern forms one continuous motion towards the left would be much nicer

01:53:222 (1,1,1,1) - unless you intended on this section being a reading trap, I would suggest not NC spamming and have 01:53:222 (1,1,1,1) - as one combo and 01:53:597 (1,1,1,1) - as one combo, making it much more visible to the player how they have to move, especially with 01:53:690 (1) - being almost perfectly overlapped under 01:53:503 (1) -