00:23:156 (2,3) - feels kinda empty, partially because they're spaced so closely, but also cuz i feel like the beat in between could be mapped. for spacing reference, check out 00:35:608 (1,2) - which has same beat gap but like triple the spacing
00:31:226 (3,4) - if it were me, i'd make the spacing between these two very tiny, even stacked, to represent the two strums of the same chord here
00:32:379 (3) - feels like an important clickable beat is missing (the strum) due to the slider end. just something i immediately noticed, but honestly i could argue for what you have already as well. ultimately up to you
00:51:057 (4,5) - the strums feel strong enough where shortening 4 and adding a duplet here would be pretty fitting
00:17:852 (3,4,5,6,7) - the spacing increments feel a bit lackluster here, you could start off with tighter spacing at first to make the overall intensity of the gradually increasing spacing stronger
05:19:855 (1) - the change in movement here doesn't feel appropriate given everything surrounding this. given your current flow, i naturally want my cursor to travel from 05:19:562 (2) - somewhere near to in front of 05:19:123 (1) - or under 05:19:416 (1) -
05:15:172 (3,4,5) - looks and feels a bit strange because of the stacking. since 1/2 gap, i would move it much lower, possibly under 05:14:733 (1) - or something