01:15:271 (1,2,3) - 01:17:439 (2,3) - feels weird to suddenly use 1/3 here, when you haven't followed melody before and focused on drums instead.
i would suggest a rhythms like this for the first timestamp: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18575431/b7d6
and for the second one, you can just use full 1/2 there since they have drums on those beats.
the alternative would be to follow 1/3 melody more consistently throughout the section
01:51:415 (2) - the inclusion of this shape is very sudden and really hard to read for platter imo. that fact that the slider has significantly increased SV just adds to the difficulty. i think you could try a similar idea with lower SV, or alternatively use a slider with curves similar to the rest of the section (but keeping increased SV for intensity of the sound)
00:57:198 (3,1) - nerf this spacing a bit? the dash is a bit tight, considering it's right after a hdash
00:15:271 (1,2) - space these a bit higher (like the one after that) to make it read a bit clearer as double dash
02:00:313 (1) - sounds better to end it at 02:00:901 - imo because that's where the sound abruptly fades out much more
01:54:307 (1) - would play better at 1.0x sv imo, now it's below walking speed so some tap walking is required
i mean i also find super low sv annoying to play on low diffs and always have, but there's differing opinions on this for sure. on C/S sliders it's more of a walk -> standstill -> walk in opposite direction which feels more natural than alternating between walking in the same direction and standstills